saveferris

July 1st, 2010 at 4:56 PM ^

How else do you think Washington and his generals were able to convince an army of part-time soldiers, farmers-by-profession to stand 100 yards away from the most powerful army on Earth and trade musket fire with them.  Let me tell you, none of you would be doing that sober.

HAIL 2 VICTORS

July 1st, 2010 at 7:29 PM ^

It's all fun and games until you learn that the trunk of a 74 Buick Apollo (first car-college) can actually get warm enough to ignite the $600 Missouri fireworks purchase as you cross the state line and the Illinois State Police can not stop laughing at your impromptu pyrotechnics display.

octal9

July 1st, 2010 at 4:10 PM ^

That's because  graph isn't entirely clear in its representation of data... 

Sure, it says 22% of fireworks-related injuries were due to sparklers, but it doesn't say how many sparklers didn't injure people. A glance at the graph says "whoa, sparklers and publicly displayed fireworks are more dangerous than homemade fireworks!" but I'm willing to bet that it'd be a better representation if data were normalized.

edit: oh god, I am such a (math/stats/comp science) dork

strafe

July 1st, 2010 at 4:30 PM ^

Don't feel bad, I'm sitting in my lab 30 feet below the diag, literally in tears over the lack of context for that graph :(

restive neb

July 1st, 2010 at 6:47 PM ^

plus a second critique of the chart:  No context on severity of injury.  I'm guessing most of the sparkler injuries were of the "burn" variety, and far more of the home-made fireworks were of the "now-I'm-learning-to-write-with-my-left-hand" variety.

hokiewolf

July 2nd, 2010 at 1:06 PM ^

In my neighborhood we preferred a dozen bottle rockets at a time, fired from a shipping tube.  Inevitably, only ten or eleven of a given volley would light, and the slow kid would look into the tube to see what went wrong.  

Good times, and thankfully no permanent physical damage.  I've heard that the slow kid still has trouble looking in the mailbox, though.

 

 

 

 

Blazefire

July 2nd, 2010 at 1:41 PM ^

I don't think you can get them anymore, but you used to be able to get "Moon Rockets" bottle rockets, that came in a cardboard holder instead of just a bag. There were a dozen, side by side, and each in its own little track. each one had a progressively longer fuse, and then they were all twisted together at one side, so you could light them all at once. The entire pack would fire one right after the other, "Fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-fwoosh-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!-BLAM!"

Good times.

Mr. Robot

July 1st, 2010 at 2:35 PM ^

This is the first time in my life I can remember NOT having anything of questionable Michigan legality to use (Except for some bottle rockets, but those don't count).

*sigh*

I guess its a public display for me this year...

HartAttack20

July 1st, 2010 at 4:22 PM ^

When my dad was a kid, some crazy guy that lived near him on the lake thought it was an awesome idea to get drunk and light off quarter sticks of dynamite. That got boring, I guess, so he went with a half stick to end it. As it turns out, sea walls and dynamite don't mix very well. He was not happy when he woke up. 

InterM

July 1st, 2010 at 9:04 PM ^

I figured Twilight would be kinda like cockroaches -- it'll survive after all of civilization is gone.  And just imagine the alien life form that comes along afterward and discovers what's left of the Earth.  "Wow, dude, check out this lethal toxin that wiped out this species!  This place is clearly inhabitable -- let's go home."