OT -- AL MVP ... Joe Mauer?

Submitted by hailtothevictors08 on
the lack of football leads me too the interesting question of who should be Al MVP ... Mauer is on a team that has almost 0 shot at the playoffs yet has absolutly sick numbers (.383 avg, 25 hrs, 77 rbis, .448 obp etc.) even though he plays the hardest position to hit at because it beast you up as a catcher and missed the first month ... on the other hand is he more valuable to a losing team then say tex or (ack)jeter is to the yanks or even cabrera is to the tigers? i always tend to go with the player who a playoff team can least afford to lose (in this case cabrera because the tigers cant score without him) but mauer has been so good ... thoughts?

wishitwas97

August 19th, 2009 at 10:34 PM ^

to go along with divisional games packed in the final month. The Twins aren't out of it yet, much to my dismay. The Tigers are the most likely to make the playoff because they have the pitching to do it. The offense just needs to be good enough to put them over the top.

WolvinLA

August 19th, 2009 at 6:51 PM ^

This is a no-brainer, IMO. Unless he really drops off or another guy has a nasty last 40 games, he should win it. And UQ, I kind of agree with you, but I'd say Minny has about 2% of making the playoffs.

OMG Shirtless

August 19th, 2009 at 7:06 PM ^

I think it's Mauer's to lose. I don't think the Twins are definitely out of it though. The Twins are sneaky bastards and I wouldn't put it past them to make another late season run. I won't count them out until they've been mathematically eliminated. The AL Central is such a cluster fuck, the Tigers end the season playing 13 games out of 16 against the Sox and Twins which can dramatically fuck up the standings. The Tigers and Sox are definitely the favorites, but the Twins are still hanging around.

JC3

August 19th, 2009 at 8:02 PM ^

I heard the argument today (on espn) that the MVP should come from a team with a good record. I usually would agree, but I just think Mauer's having such an excellent year that he deserves it.

SpartanDan

August 19th, 2009 at 9:14 PM ^

Yes, a player's value is measured in part by team success. But that doesn't mean the player on the better team is automatically more valuable. Replace Mauer with an average MLB catcher, and the Twins would be utterly awful. Replace, say, Cabrera or Texiera with an average MLB first baseman, and the Tigers or Yankees would be worse off but still in the hunt. Mauer leads the majors in batting average and OBP, and trails only Pujols in slugging (and leads the AL by a whopping .090). He's in the top 10 in the AL in homers and RBI despite missing a month. It would be an absolute joke for a player who's done far less to get the award because he has better teammates. If it's close, I can buy the argument that team success could act as a tiebreaker of sorts, but when someone is this far ahead of the rest of the pack, you'd have to be nuts to give it to someone else. (That could change in the last month and a half of the season, but for now it's not close.)

Tshimanga Cowabunga

August 19th, 2009 at 9:56 PM ^

Replace Cabrera on the Tigers with an average first baseman and I can guarantee you that they are not in first place in their division right now. Cabrera is batting .330 while the next best batter on the Tigs is at .275. While even Cabrera isn't thriving with runners in scoring position he is still the only constant offensive threat on the Tigers. The only real counter-argument is that the Tigers are winning with defense and pitching and not hitting but even the best teams need to score runs to win games.

buckstachehater

August 19th, 2009 at 9:24 PM ^

I respectfully disagree. I think its important that an MVP plays for a winning team. Part of being an MVP is raising the level of those who play around you. If your doing a good job of that, your team should be a contender.