Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1 day ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 2 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 2 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 583 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 91 comments
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 61 comments
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 6 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    5 replies
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    21 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    8 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    7 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    11 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    8 replies
  • META : Drupalgeddon2. Unpatched Drupal servers being hacked
    11 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    72 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    41 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  • Baseball's win streak at 19 after 11th inning walkoff over PSU
    16 replies
  • OT: RIP Verne Troyer
    56 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    34 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    118 replies
  • Michigan Mercies Maryland, Softball Wins 12-1 (5 inn.)
    18 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    21 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    5 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    118 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    8 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    72 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    34 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    8 replies
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    76 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    41 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    7 replies
  • This Week/Weekend's Football Visitors
    51 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    11 replies
  • Baseball's win streak at 19 after 11th inning walkoff over PSU
    16 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  • Michigan Football Hype Video 2018-19 Season
    31 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Buckle Up
    159 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • What past season would you have liked to see an Amazon-style documentary on?
    121 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    118 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

OT: 4th and 2 in your own territory near the end of the game

19 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
November 16th, 2009 at 9:22 PM
#1
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
OT: 4th and 2 in your own territory near the end of the game

This blog previously considered the question whether or not one should go for it on 4th and goal from the 2. I recall the analysis, among other advantages, showing that, from NFL stats, the chance of making a touchdown (7pts) was about .6, yielding .6*7=4.2 pts on average, which exceeds the score from a made field goal.

Now Bill Belichick is being fried by the talking heads in New England for making a similar decision to go for...but to go for it not on the goal line but in his own territory (30 yd line) on 4th and 2 with 2 minutes left in the game vs IND, who is down by 6pts. Brady's pass was complete but marked inches short when it was bobbled, enabling IND to have a short field (30 yards) to score the winning TD. I know that Belichick's decision to go for it violates intuition and almost universal coaching practice. But was the decision really a mistake, as so many claim?

According to my VERY ROUGH and QUICK calculations and the graphical link below, the chance of NE winning was .68 with the decision to go for it vs. .5 if he decided to punt. So, I think Bill made the right choice. I'd be interested to know if anyone has different opinions about the chances of winning based on the assumptions, I have made below.

Note: Remember that, if NE succeeds on 4th and 2, the game is virtually over as they can run out the clock. I've assumed a 40 yard punt and no unforeseen turnovers. I considered that Peyton Manning had a hot hand, the NE defense was tired, and that IND had a higher than usual chance of making a TD, whether it was from 30 yards out (after NE fails on 4th and 2)(Pr=.8) or 70 yards out (ie after a punt)(Pr=.5).

Summary: NE had a greater chance winning by going for it on 4th and 2 (.68 vs. .5)
Analysis of the 2 possible decisions:

1. NE goes for it P(make 4th and two )=.6 =Chance PATS win immediately
Pr(don’t make 4th and two) = .4
p(Ind TD with 30 yard drive)=.8, Pr(IND does not make TD with 30 yard drive)=.2
Pr(IND fails to make TD on 30 yard drive and Pats fail on 4th and 2)=.2*.4=0.08
TOTAL CHANCE PATS WIN=.6+.08=.68

2. NE punts
Pr(IND TD with 70 yard drive)=.5* Pr(IND fails to score on 70 yard drive)=.5
TOTAL CHANCE PATS WIN=.5

http://cid-4bf9d75c782b05b1.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/ne%204th%20and%2...

Here's an article on the game decision.http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/politi/index.ssf/2009/11/new_england_patriots_coach_bil.html

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • 4th and 2
  • Brady
  • Statistics

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 16th, 2009 at 9:31 PM
#2
Big Shot
Joined: 05/02/2009
MGoPoints: 643
Belichick made the right

Belichick made the right decision given the situation. The only reason he's getting fried by the talking heads is because he made an unconventional decision.

I'm too lazy to look at the details of your statistical analysis right now, but your final probability figures are close to what I expected.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 9:33 PM
#3
maizenblue92
maizenblue92's picture
Joined: 01/01/2009
MGoPoints: 11527
Right choice

I think he made the right the choice because even if he punted Peyton would have probably lead them down the field anyway. Because Peyton was on fire in the 4th.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 9:34 PM
#4
dakotapalm
dakotapalm's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 2267
I believe this horse was

I believe this horse was sufficiently beaten last night. For the record, smartfootball wrote about this, and he, as usual was right. Go look it up.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 10:08 PM
(Reply to #4) #5
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
Yes, I see your note.

The formula is correct, but I don't see any numbers applied to prove that going for it was actually better. Also, the numbers I've suggested are, in part, based on actual published NFL stats on the chances of making 4th and 2.

In any case, thanks for directing me to the discussion...the board changes so fast that I don't keep up with all of it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 9:37 PM
#6
Plegerize
Plegerize's picture
Joined: 03/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1807
Indeed. The Pats were playing

Indeed. The Pats were playing to win, not to not lose. Had they converted that play, Belicheck would've been considered a genius for finishing the game and taking the risk.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 9:37 PM
#7
mfan_in_ohio
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 4461
not quite

IIRC, the Colts still had the two minute warning and a TO left, so if the Pats make it, they would probably still have to go run-run-run-punt, and the Colts get it with 30 seconds left in their own territory with no TO's. Still unlikely they win, but not impossible.

My issue with Belichick was the play calling. If he was going to go for it on 4th and 2, he should have run it on 3rd and 2. Maybe he gets the first, maybe not, but he might get it close enough for a sneak, plus Indy has to either use a TO or let it go down to the two minute warning, in which case NE gets a free TO to plan its 4th down call. Plus, now NE gets to keep its TO so Indy can't run the clock all the way down before they score.

Either way, Kirk Ferentz is stupider.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 9:47 PM
#8
UMWest22
Joined: 10/26/2009
MGoPoints: 437
I can't believe

That Monday Night Countdown just spent pretty much the entire hour and a half discussing this issue. This might be the best example of killing a (non)issue I've ever seen, esp. since, as someone said earlier, if they would have converted, he would have been hailed as the greatest tactician of all time.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 9:55 PM
#9
The FannMan
The FannMan's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 9587
Interesting twist

Same facts (minus the 2 minnute warning), except it is Saturday. We are somehow winning, it is fourth and two on our 28. You are Rich Rod. Do you punt or do you go for it? Given our defense, I would try to get the two yards.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 10:14 PM
(Reply to #8) #10
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
That's probably the most important question

If you mean that you are asking whether to go for it, when it is not the end of the game, though, it would be a lot more complicated to figure out. Maybe you could do simulations.

If it was worthwhile to go for it on 4th and 2, in general, that could affect outcomes much more, since the narrow end-of-game strategies are not frequent enough to matter a lot.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 9:59 PM
#11
remdog
Joined: 05/14/2009
MGoPoints: 927
Interesting numbers

But a bit too complicated for me.

Apparently New England has had a 75% success rated on fourth down against Indy in recent years. If the chance of stopping Manning and the Colts from a TD from 70 yards out is less than 75% it appears to be a mathematically good decision. NE stopped Indy short of a TD 6/8 drives in the first half (75%) but only 3/5 (60%) drives in the second half prior to the last drive. The last two TD drives Indy scored on 79 yards out in 1:59 and 1:44. In between, Manning threw a pick. Manning would have had about 2 minutes and probably 70 yards to go on the last drive after a punt. So, it appears that NE probably had a slightly better chance of winning by picking up a first down then stopping Manning and the Colts after a punt.

So, based on the numbers, it was not a bad call.

But I still think NE should have punted. The numbers are deceiving. NE had just failed to pick up a first down on 3rd and 2. Also, if not for a bad spot, NE actually should have had a first down. So it is arguable that NE made a first down but got robbed. So they not only had to get a first down - but by a decent margin. This makes their 75% chance of a first down a bit lower. It's also important to have some faith in your defense's ability to keep Indy from going 70 yards in 2 minutes. If you can't do this at least once in the fourth quarter, you don't deserve to win.

Belicheck made a couple other glaring errors:

1. Throwing on third down when he apparently planned to go for it on 4th down. Indy was sitting on the short passes on the last few plays. A run would have likely gained some yardage and made a 4th down attempt that much easier. A run would have burned some clock and/or an Indy timeout.

2. Burning his own timeouts.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 10:11 PM
(Reply to #9) #12
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
I did assume that the chance of making a 1st down was less than

I assumed 60% and the decision still favored going for it

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 10:10 PM
#13
jrt336
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 4498
That was one of the ballsiest

That was one of the ballsiest calls I've ever seen. It was a first down too. He had possession at the 30 even after bobbling it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 10:24 PM
#14
Swayze Howell Sheen
Swayze Howell Sheen's picture
Joined: 10/05/2008
MGoPoints: 14684
why belichick was wrong

simple: public relations. if you lose after going for it,
you get fried. if you lose after punting, people don't
think twice about it.

as the old political saying goes, "if you're explaining,
you're losing." bill had to spend a lot of time explaining
his decision, and hence...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 10:38 PM
(Reply to #14) #15
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
yes for many coaches, no for Bill

You make a valid point, in general, about why coaches don't do what they should do here. The regret--and negative press-- over a choice that is unconventional is much greater than over a conventional one. If RR were in Bill's shoes, you'd never hear the end of it.

However, Bill is an economist and knows what he's doing when he makes choices. His boss appreciates that. So, I think that there is no possibility whatever that Bill gets fired ever for such decisions, given the number of wins and SB's he's racked up. That's probably why he felt free to make the decision, IMO.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 10:55 PM
#16
wishitwas97
Joined: 01/29/2009
MGoPoints: 91
I agree with his call

to go for it. The odd of him converting 4th down and stopping Peyton Manning from scoring from 30 yards are better than punting the ball and have Peyton drive 70 yards to score and then try to get a game winning FG.

Even with out that odd, chances of converting 4th and 2 are better than preventing Peyton from driving down the field(70 yards) to score a TD.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 11:03 PM
#17
MadtownMaize
MadtownMaize's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 2347
This is a fun one

for arguments sake. Many Michigan fans often had a problem with Carr because he always put the game in the hands of his defense, even when his offense was the best unit on the team. Belichick believed that Tom Brady getting 2 yards in one try gave his team the best chance to win the game. I am sure that if they were not playing Peyton Manning he very likely would have punted. I have no problem with the call.
I do have a problem with Kirk Ferentz's call. (FAIL)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 16th, 2009 at 11:50 PM
#18
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
I thought this was going to

I thought this was going to be about the Purdue game. I wanted us to go for it then, but then, it's easy for fans like me to be riverboat gamblers - we don't have to live with the consequences.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 17th, 2009 at 12:00 AM
#19
AMazinBlue
AMazinBlue's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 4805
The only stats that are relevant in this case

are stats based on a team going for 4th and 2 from their own 30 yd line appx on the road with the game on the line. To simply use going for it on 4th down or even 4th and 2 means relatively nothing. Without the extenuating circumstances duplicated, all the statisical evidence shows are the chances of success in a generic 4th down situation.

Whether Belichick was right or wrong is debatable only in that we know the outcome and are able to debate it. Had it succeeded, this is a non-issue, or better yet a "brilliant" call. Logic says punt and make them go 70 yards, roughly. Apparently Manning had not been 100% successful from that distance.

Obviously Manning is more likely to score from 30 yards than 70 insode of 2 minutes. Had this been Jim Zorn or a rookie HC, he would be villified, maybe fired if it was Zorn. But Belichick should get a pass because of his proven success.

Either way I have yet to see any evidence with the specific scenario described. Without, all this is pure conjecture and opinion.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.