Only upset about two games this year - Purdue & Illinois

Submitted by karpodiem on
The rest I can live with. But those two I wish we could have back. I feel that mental toughness was absent in those two efforts. Despite the mess that has come upon us from the last seven weeks, that is my only disappointment from this season. Oh, and God bless Brandon Graham. A True Michigan Man.

Go for 2

November 22nd, 2009 at 9:07 AM ^

I was disappointed at how fractured our fan base became. You know people say a lot of things about R Rod, but what I find fascinating about him is that his assessment of the team is extremely accurate. He actually never sugar coats anything. He stated the offense would be better. Check. He said that the problem with freshman quarterbacks is they play like freshman. Check. He stated immediately, that David Molk was BY FAR, the most important player on the TEAM. Yeah, check. And he also stated that the defensive depth would be a problem. Check and check. Wins and losses happen, we had more than last year when we had better defensive personnel. We go LMFAO at pounding MAC teams this year - last year we couldn't beat Toledo. Objectively the team is improving, and R Rod has said as much (as in I see the light at the end of the tunnel). I believe him, because honestly he hasn't really lied about anything - including self assessment (I'm sure the bitter board members will point some out but I find them mostly as aggrandizements). Why the negative fan base is coming out and unloading right now is beyond me. Michigan had been in decline since it's zenith in 2006 and we were toxic to begin with - what with the losing to App State and all. If you are going to a whole sale change and you have maybe 8 contributors total in your junior and senior class then maybe depth and capacity is a problem. I wish the fan base would criticize his coaching when we had ACTUAL TALENT. That has been the disappointment of this year. 5-7 was very realistic for this program when we started the year. Calling for his head after YEARS of mediocrity that he has to single handedly change is ludicrous honestly. I have no idea how much time is enough time, but whatever we have given I can tell you is not enough. More OSU than Michigan fans at the big house - if that isn't generated by the fracture I don't know what is - and the worst is there is no scarlet letter we can put on these people to say, "hey you're the jerk who had zero patience with a young team - learning new systems, trying to get better. We will throw things at you now that we are good". People can hurt these kids, sell their tickets, not support them at games and when the team becomes exceptional (and it will) they will be right back when the team starts winning again. And they will win again - because R Rod has not consistently lost anywhere. So that won't happen here either. I just hope he gets enough time to do it.

A2MIKE

November 22nd, 2009 at 9:15 AM ^

I don't feel like there were more OSU fans than Michigan fans. I also know part of the problem is the season ticket renewals hit an all time low after last season. I got 2 renewable season tickets this year with no prior donating history and only donating $300. My seats are in section 12, right where I asked to be and inside of row 50. I would be willing to bet that Michigan gave OSU more than the normal allotment of tickets. Also, for the first time that I could remember the ticket office put OSU tickets on sale to the general public, albeit in a 3 game package.

sjastrz

November 22nd, 2009 at 9:08 AM ^

I'm not really upset about Purdue. I'd love to have that game back but they did play a great game and deserved to win. Illinois on the other hand...

Jeff

November 22nd, 2009 at 11:34 AM ^

All the losses hurt, but I agree with you. The only bad loss this year was Illinois. They had been playing terrible all year and then they give us a beatdown in the second half. For Purdue, I was upset in the sense that I really thought we would beat them and once we lost I was resigned to a 5-7 season. But it's hard to call it a bad loss when the offense played very well and scored 36 points. If we had recovered one onside kick, everything would have been different.

Go for 2

November 22nd, 2009 at 9:11 AM ^

I was disappointed by Illinois - a team playing very poorly with a horrible defense and a quarterback who was having a horrible year. The same game plan from OSU would have won us the game. And it has been a long time since a Michigan team couldn't punch it in from the one yard line. I expected Purdue to beat us mostly because they were a pass oriented team which we have just not been able to stop all year. I was surprised we had a chance to win that game or that we were ahead in the beginning. But we played like a young team all year - giving up leads, making mistakes, a ton of turnovers. It will get better - I am sure of it.

.ghost.

November 22nd, 2009 at 9:14 AM ^

watching KIRK FREAKING COUSINS run for a first down on countless third and longs was easily the most frustrated i have been watching a game this season. and the snaps. oh, those snaps.

Tater

November 22nd, 2009 at 10:14 AM ^

But UM was just MSU, Purdue, and Illinois away from having a decent season. Their prediciment reminds me of the old joke/axiom about the Lion cub asking his father if he had to be faster than the entire herd of deer to eat today, and the father saying, "Son, we just have to be faster than the slowest one." If UM improves just enough to beat those middle to bottom feeders, we're looking at eight wins going into a bowl. That is really a very small improvement. If the defense had played against those teams like they did against OSU yesterday, they would have won all three of them. Michigan got better; it just took OSU to bring it out. At least they have something to build on for next year. Given RR's record of improvement, they will improve enough to win at least eight. I still think nine is appropriate and should get the idiots off of RR's back.

KBLOW

November 22nd, 2009 at 10:21 AM ^

After losing Molk Illinois is the only one I'm upset about. But which games do we lose if RR had had a non-freshman, spread compatible QB (or two)? I'm thinking Wisconsin and still maybe Purdue b/c of how horrible the secondary is.

NOLA Wolverine

November 22nd, 2009 at 11:38 AM ^

I'm upset about MSU, Iowa, Illinois, Purdue, and Ohio State. We could have won all of those games. Hopefully, these are the games that make teams grow over time, they just need to learn how to win the competitive games late. It will come, happens with young guys (Or an entire team of them).