Better result this time around.
Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon
Once again, We control our own destiny
March 6th, 2013 at 12:08 AM
#302
Let's hope for a
March 6th, 2013 at 12:09 AM
#303
Purdue first.
Purdue first.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:27 AM
#304
$6 tickets
available right now on StubHub for Michigan @ Purdue tomorrow night at 7pm. Tempting idea, driving those 130 miles from SW Michigan to W. Lafayette when I get out of work tomorrow....
March 6th, 2013 at 9:05 AM
#305
Purdue?
Another reason to have no respect for Purdue: $6 tickets on stub hub against a top ten team, and one that Purdue always plays like a "rivalry game." If their own fans don't care, why should anyone else?
March 6th, 2013 at 9:14 AM
#306
I'll bet there were plenty of
I'll bet there were plenty of $6 tix in Crisler at the end of Beilein's first year.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:01 AM
#307
That year students had it
That year students had it made for tickets at Michigan- there were lots of incentives for games- so counting free crap you got games were basically free.
The sad part for me is that Purdue this year is much better than that Michigan team. They are 7-9 with two home games left- granted home games against Michigan and Minnesota are tough- they could get to .500- fans should come out and cheer for that. They made the Sweet 16 in '09 and '10, and the tournament the last two years. They have been a solid program, and have decent tradition- it is sad tickets are apparently so easy to come by for this game...
March 6th, 2013 at 10:47 AM
#308
I can understand it.
Mid-week
I can understand it.
Mid-week game. Not Senior Night. Rough start to what was always going to be a rebuilding year (6-6 non-conference schedule with a loss to EMU). Got blown out at home in historic fasion in rivalry game (a game in which no one left until the game ended). "Are we bubble in for the NIT?" is not a big casual fan draw.
Now, I'm not saying they don't deserve fan support. They've, in many ways, overachieved after the core players that had defined Purdue for half a decade graduated (E'tuan Moore, Jujuan Johnson, the long saga of Robbie Hummel). Going into Wisconsin and winning by 13 is tough and they're going to be competitive in the conference next year as Hammonds looks like the real deal. And everytime I've seen a Purdue home game, they've played hard and had loud and large student support. It will be a tough setting for Michigan regardless of the $6 tix.
But I am saying that I can understand non-student fans choosing not to make at least a 3 hour commitment on a Wednesday night. People are kidding themselves if they think Crisler wouldn't be the same in a similar situation.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:10 AM
#309
You wrote that up before the
You wrote that up before the game was in hand didn't you? SHAME ON YOU
/s
but seriously
March 6th, 2013 at 12:11 AM
#310
Wrote it
when Ohio was up 10 with 1:15 left... Can't blame me for getting a head start... And didn't post it until there were all zeroes on the clock. I'm pretty sure there's no shame here.
March 6th, 2013 at 7:23 AM
#311
No shame at all. Well
No shame at all. Well played, Hokemaniac.
March 6th, 2013 at 8:37 AM
#312
You wrote that up before the
You wrote that up before the game was in hand didn't you? SHAME ON YOU
/s
but seriously
Starting threads on MGoBlog: serious business.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:09 AM
#313
It's time to put up or shut
It's time to put up or shut up. We can get another title.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:09 AM
#314
Fucking Penn State. Fucking
Fucking Penn State. Fucking half-court shots.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:11 AM
#315
I hear you, in my head I'm
I hear you, in my head I'm like: 3 pt loss @ OSU, Wisconsin miracle shot, Penn State shitshow. God we should've had the title 3 times over.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:20 AM
#316
Eh
We could have lost the home games to OSU and MSU just as easily. We're probably close to where we belong.
March 6th, 2013 at 11:52 PM
#319
Yeah, but the other four
Yeah, but the other four contenders are probably thinking the same thing about their own heartbreaking or boneheaded losses (example: IU's meltdown in the last two minutes of their game at Illinois). B1G is a bitch this year.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:10 AM
#320
Thank you Ohio for giving
Thank you Ohio for giving both yourselves and TSUN a chance at a title. Now suck it up and root for your enemy.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:33 AM
#321
still don't know
why they didn't foul that dude.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:11 AM
#322
Let's Effing do it
Destiny awaits....
March 6th, 2013 at 12:18 AM
#323
Kelly.... Yes, please
Kelly.... Yes, please
March 6th, 2013 at 12:12 AM
#327
Two major concerns:1. When
Two major concerns:
1. When we control our destiny, we crap the bed.
2. No matter how crappy Purdue is, they always shoot lights out against us.
Fuck Penn State and Wisconsin.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:13 AM
#328
Purdue
It will be interesting to see how Purdue plays. They just played their game of the year @ Wisc.
Doubt they play like that 2 games in a row. I'm pretty sure Michigan will hit a 3 this game as well.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:35 AM
#329
I can't generate any hatred
I can't generate any hatred towards Penn State for that game. We had a lead and pissed it away, but they won the game fair and square (officiating was just typical away B1G officiating). Wisconsin on the other hand? They can go screw themselves.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:51 AM
#330
maybe the serendipity
of the stauskas injury and playing levert might improve our defense a little bit. It could also be a minor epiphany that stauskas could be better off the bench to get the crucial three pointer when necessary. . .
March 6th, 2013 at 2:07 AM
#331
You know Byrd is going to go
You know Byrd is going to go off tommorow.
March 6th, 2013 at 9:10 AM
#332
Well, for a half anyway. It
Well, for a half anyway. It was the first half last time we played. It was the second half against their win at Wisconsin. Hope he doesn't put a whole game together.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:11 AM
#333
Seed
If Michigan wins out, what seed will they get in the B10 Tourn.?
March 6th, 2013 at 12:14 AM
#334
Depends on Wisco
unfortunatley
March 6th, 2013 at 12:21 AM
#335
3 or 4
3 if MSU beats Wisconsin, 4 if it goes the other way.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:13 AM
#338
Somehow I still hate Ohio
I guess I can't help myself.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:32 AM
#339
We
Understand
March 6th, 2013 at 12:13 AM
#340
Please let Ohio lose to
Please let Ohio lose to Illinois, Wisconsin beat msu, and Michigan win out!!!!
March 6th, 2013 at 12:23 AM
#341
Wouldn't Wisconsin then win
Wouldn't Wisconsin then win the title due to their tiebreaker over us?
March 6th, 2013 at 12:31 AM
#342
They'd tie for it with us and
They'd tie for it with us and IU because they'd have the same record. I'd rather tie with IU and Wisconsin than msu or ohio.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:02 AM
#343
For regular season title
For regular season title there are no tiebreakers, the team(s) with the best record win the title If we beat Purdue and Indiana, then it's highly likely we have a 4-way tie: Indiana, Michigan, winner of Wisconsin/MSU, and Ohio State as Big Ten champs.
For seeding purposes, Wisconsin would get a better seed, in this scenario I think we end up the 4-seed in the tournament.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:35 AM
#344
You are bad at MGoBlog.
Edit: this was previously reply to some mouthbreather who left an idiotic comment. Disregard.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:19 AM
#345
Oh crap, here we go
Oh crap, here we go again...
Good God, BEAT PURDON'T
March 6th, 2013 at 12:48 AM
#346
Calling them "Purdon't" seems
Calling them "Purdon't" seems like something that I would have found funny when I was like eight years old.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:19 AM
#347
got to win a very hard B10 road game
To earn the right to play for the title. Need to give it 40 minutes and really step on their necks. Get up early and pour it on.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:20 AM
#348
Two seconds thinking about
Two seconds thinking about anything other than Purdue is three seconds too many.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:25 AM
#349
If we didn't speculate about
If we didn't speculate about the future, 75% of this blog content would be gone. We're fans, not the team.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:39 AM
#350
For sure. I guess I mean this
For sure. I guess I mean this young team...
Though getting ahead of things hasn't worked out so hot for us fans either this season.
Anyway, IU's loss doesn't mean a whole lot to us until after we beat Purdue.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:46 AM
#351
But it's worth focusing on
But it's worth focusing on Purdue, because it could be a good game. They're not a pushover. They're 7-9 in league play, and road trips in this conference are seldom easy.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:21 AM
#352
Please...focus...
...on Purdue...one game at a time! Wednesday's game is tremendous. Purdue handled Wisconsin @ Wisco...and they aren't going to rollover for us.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:39 AM
#353
Purdue is terrible.
Purdue is terrible.
March 6th, 2013 at 6:53 AM
#354
So is
Penn State.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:21 AM
#355
Do me a favor
and stop saying that.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:24 AM
#356
I asked
this question on the game trhead so I'll post it here as well.
If Sparty beats Wisc, and four teams finish 13-5, who would be the #1 Seed?
March 6th, 2013 at 12:33 AM
#357
I think Sparty.Everyone
I think Sparty.
Everyone would be even against each other at the top (everyone would be 1-1) and once again Wisconsin would be the next tie-breaker. Sparty would be 2-0 agains them. I then think we'd become the 4 seed. Actually maybe not. They lost to Wiscy also which would mean the next tie-breaker team, Minnesota, which we beat twice. Indiana a 4-seed?!
I could be terribly wrong on all of this I'm doing if off the top of my head right now.
Edit: Wrong. Indiana is #1 as they beat Sparty twice.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:31 AM
#358
Not sure...
...but it was mentioned that Michigan's seed won't be good due to the Wisconsin loss.
Apperantly we lose a lot of the tie-breakers.
Now MSU and Wisky still play each other so one of them will fall to 6 losses. We just need to win 2 games, screw the seeds.
I do want to face Wisky in the B1G Tournament again though...and PSU. Those losses just pissed me off. I hope we get the Nittany Lions and then the Bagers right after. Get those losses out of the way in then move on to play one of the Big Boys (no offense to Wisconsin).
March 6th, 2013 at 12:38 AM
#359
If we play PSU, that means
If we play PSU, that means we're the 5 seed and have to play an extra game.
No thanks.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:43 AM
#360
Ah...
I was hoping somehow they'd have to play a game to get to us...forget that then.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:41 AM
#361
Ah...
I was hoping somehow they'd have to play a game to get to us...forget that then.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:43 AM
#362
Or we're the 4 seed and PSU
Or we're the 4 seed and PSU beat Wisky on a buzzer beater half court 4 pt play that caused Bo Ryan's head to explode (a man can dream can't he?)
March 6th, 2013 at 10:41 AM
#363
Not sure...
...but it was mentioned that Michigan's seed won't be good due to the Wisconsin loss.
Apperantly we lose a lot of the tie-breakers.
Now MSU and Wisky still play each other so one of them will fall to 6 losses. We just need to win 2 games, screw the seeds.
I do want to face Wisky in the B1G Tournament again though...and PSU. Those losses just pissed me off. I hope we get the Nittany Lions and then the Bagers right after. Get those losses out of the way in then move on to play one of the Big Boys (no offense to Wisconsin).
March 6th, 2013 at 12:33 AM
#364
Another thing to think about...
Illinois DESTROYED Ohio the first time around, and they're somewhat fighting for the Tournament resume right now.
Ohio could have a little post-IU hangover and Illinois could go in there and get a win. This would obviously help Michigan move up in terms of seeding.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:40 AM
#365
Another thing to think about...
Illinois DESTROYED Ohio the first time around, and they're somewhat fighting for the Tournament resume right now.
Ohio could have a little post-IU hangover and Illinois could go in there and get a win. This would obviously help Michigan move up in terms of seeding.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:37 AM
#366
IU would get the 1 seed.
IU would get the 1 seed. They'd have a 4-2 record against the tied teams. MSU would be 4th @ 2-4. We'd tie OSU at 3-3 but they'd win the tie-breaker for the 2 seed because they'd have a better record against the #5 team (Wisconsin.)
If Wisconsin wins out and we beat IU, they're the 1 seed.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:45 AM
#367
If Wisconsin wins out...
Would that push us to the #4 seed?
Also, I feel like Illinois is going to give Ohio a run for their money.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:53 AM
#368
Yep. Wisconsin would be the 1
Yep. Wisconsin would be the 1 at 3-1 vs. us, IU, and OSU. OSU would be second at 3-3. We'd tie IU at 2-3 but they have a better record against Sparty. So we'd likely face Sparty in the quarters in that scenario. Joy.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:38 AM
#369
If Wisconsin wins out...
Would that push us to the #4 seed?
Also, I feel like Illinois is going to give Ohio a run for their money.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:45 AM
#370
Indiana would get the 1 seed
We get screwed by the tiebreakers. There's no way we can get the 1 seed, and we can only get a 2 if OSU, Wisconsin, and MSU all lose another game. Here's the seeding for the two 4-way tie scenarios:
- Wisconsin
- Ohio State
- Indiana
- Michigan
OR
- Indiana
- Ohio State
- Michigan
- Michigan State
March 6th, 2013 at 12:25 AM
#371
I half-hope Beilien told the
I half-hope Beilien told the guys to stay away from this game tonight, and focus on the only task ahead that matters, Purdue tomorrow night.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:26 AM
#372
2nd Time Ohio has helped us...
First was their win at home vs. MSU
Let's take advantage of it!
Sidenote, Beilein said at the beginning of the year that he felt the winner of this conference would have "4 or 5" losses and I remember the announcers laughing at him and saying it was overkill.
March 6th, 2013 at 7:44 AM
#373
I believe "5-6 losses"
was the quote and clearly remember Dakich having a saracastic chuckle at the thought. 5-6 seemed high to me at the time as I didn't see Indiana losing that many. They still may not. Anyway, that quote stuck with me as the losses started to pile up for these teams. Beilein knows this league.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:39 AM
#374
You're exactly right...
It was Dakich...I also remember because he did the majority of our games early in the year.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:38 AM
#375
2nd Time Ohio has helped us...
First was their win at home vs. MSU
Let's take advantage of it!
Sidenote, Beilein said at the beginning of the year that he felt the winner of this conference would have "4 or 5" losses and I remember the announcers laughing at him and saying it was overkill.
March 6th, 2013 at 11:41 AM
#376
Was this a double post in
Was this a double post in reply to your own comment?
/mind blown
March 6th, 2013 at 12:27 AM
#377
I hope they understand they have something to defend
Beilein needs to remind these guys they can still win back-to-back B1G titles. Any extra motivation would be great to help them focus tomorrow.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:27 AM
#378
Semifinals tomorrow
God willing, Championship game on Sunday. I couldn't care less about b10 tournament seeding...Back to back championships in the best league in the country...That would be one heck of a legacy for Trey Burke to leave at the University of Michigan. Come on blue, you've got this.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:30 AM
#379
(No subject)
March 6th, 2013 at 12:31 AM
#380
Seth
Seth if you post the IU guess the score right now, I swear on all that is holy....
March 6th, 2013 at 12:33 AM
#381
Off topic
But how long will espn keep showing that Clowney hit on V. Smith in the bowl game? It was 1 of 2 effing good plays he had in the whole damn game.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:39 AM
#382
Probably never
as long as the play is on the Best of the Best play. It has not been unseated for weeks.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:34 AM
#383
If It Helps At All...
The prevailing lines that I can find would have Michigan as a 6-7 point favorite, and indeed, Massey and TeamRankings are going with about a 75% chance for a Michigan win. By the numbers, this really is all about the wins now. By many estimates, our chances of winning out are not insignifcant either - by Massey's numbers, it would be a bit less than 40% to win out. Not impressive odds, but not so small as to not garner a mention.
As for Purdue, by the stats, we're much better on offense and about the same on defense, so hopefully, we win tomorrow and the regular season's final game becomes a truly classic, full-of-consquences game.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:34 AM
#384
This is gonna be a grind.
This is gonna be a grind. Woud you rather Michigan lose on friday or saturday next week if it meant they had a longer rest? I think the lack of rest really screwed them last year.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:44 AM
#385
Man, Michigan is half court
Man, Michigan is half court shot and a bad Penn State loss away from having a one game lead in the Big Ten and a chance on Sunday to win the conference out right!
March 6th, 2013 at 10:11 AM
#386
Agreed, but we could've just
Agreed, but we could've just as easily lost to OSU and MSU at home (beat them by a combined 3 points). We're probably right around where we should be (I would argue between Wisconsin/Penn State/3-Point Loss to OSU we should've grabbed one of them, but, it didn't work out like that).
March 6th, 2013 at 12:45 AM
#387
If we win out
Is there a scenario where Michigan and Wisconsin would play in the semis? I think that would be fantastic. And I doubt I'm alone on this.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:57 AM
#388
Two scenarios
If we win out
Two scenarios
If we win out and Wisconsin wins out, we'd be the 4 and they'd be the 1. If both teams go 1-1, we'd be the 5 and Wisconsin the 4, so we'd play them in the quarters.
March 6th, 2013 at 7:32 AM
#389
"Gary Moeller's Wife"?
"Gary Moeller's Wife"? That's your username?
Come on. Let's have a little decency.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:53 AM
#390
We've been given a second
We've been given a second chance, but none of that matters if we don't take care of business at Purdue tomorrow. Purdue may not have a lot to play for, but I'm sure they'd love nothing more than to ruin our hopes for a championship. Step on the gas tomorrow night and don't let up for 40 minutes.
Then we'll worry about Indiana.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:14 AM
#391
So goes it...
I'm in a happy mood for obvious reason. With the win now, this cuts the number of possible permutations from eight to four assuming OSU beats Illinois, Michigan beats Purdue, MSU beats NW, and Wisconsin beats PSU. Obviously if Indiana wins, they claim the title outright. Below listed are the scenarios for seeding going into the Big Ten Tournament.
Indians beats Michigan, Michigan State beats Wisconsin
1. Indiana 14-4
2. OSU 13-5
3. MSU 13-5
4. Wisconsin 12-6
5. Michigan 12-6
Michigan beats Indiana, Michigan State beats Wisconsin
1.Indiana 13-5
2. Ohio State 13-5
3. Michigan 13-5
4. Michigan State 13-5
5. Wisconsin 12-6
Indiana beat Michigan, Wisconsin beats Michigan State
1. Indiana 14-4
2. Wisconsin 13-5
3. Ohio State 13-5
4. Michigan State 12-6
5. Michigan 12-6
Michigan beats Indiana, Wisconsin beats Michigan State
1. Wisconsin 13-5
2. Ohio State 13-5
3. Michigan 13-5
4. Indiana 13-5
5. Michigan State 12-6
As for this week; its weird having to root for your rival to help each other so I guess this means I have to root for Michigan. Go Bl.... I can't do it, just win the damn game; thanks! After this week is over please resume to your normal hate of Ohio State, I wouldn't want it any other way. A few jabs and Ohio jokes on Mgoblog will help to reestablish the hate.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:17 AM
#392
In your final scenario,
In your final scenario, Michigan would be 4 and IU 3. Both teams lost to Wisconsin and split with OSU and each other, but IU has the better record against the 5 seed, so they'd win the tie-breaker.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:22 AM
#393
Confusion
That may be true but you may want to refer to the link here from where I got the scenarios from. I forgot to add it to my post. In addition here are the Big Ten seeding rules.Hope this clears up any confusion or mistakes the author may have made. Everything looked right when I read the article. Sorry for the confusion.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:46 AM
#394
Not your fault. That article
Not your fault. That article mistakenly has IU splitting with MSU instead of sweeping them (interestingly, it also has UM incorrectly splitting with Minnesota). But because IU was 2-0 against MSU, they hold the tie-breaker edge.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:51 AM
#395
Per my friend, who is a
Per my friend, who is a Michigan manager. Coach Beilein said "OK, so no bullshit from you bitches tomorrow," on the bus at the team once IU/OSU went final. I'd like to emphasize, I don't care what you do with Purdue, just beat IU, please? Thanks. Good lookin' out.
March 6th, 2013 at 2:27 AM
#396
Will do.
Will do.
March 6th, 2013 at 11:36 AM
#397
I have a hard time picturing
I have a hard time picturing Beilein saying that, especially 'bitches'
March 6th, 2013 at 12:46 PM
#398
I don't know what to tell you
It was posted on the Internet, so obviously it's correct. I expect ESPN to pick up this story within the hour.
March 6th, 2013 at 3:53 PM
#399
You're right, I'm lying so
You're right, I'm lying so you guys can accept me. Idk what to tell you, coaches swear?
March 6th, 2013 at 2:47 AM
#400
Yes, but what does this do
Yes, but what does this do to the earlier MGOBLOG thread, "ESPN has Michigan in the PERFECT bracket"? So long, perfect bracket. We hardly knew you....
March 6th, 2013 at 7:42 AM
#401
But, Does Michigan Control It's Own . . .
Density?
March 6th, 2013 at 7:58 AM
#402
this is how I KNOW Mgoblog is legit
My wife and my favorite movie
March 6th, 2013 at 8:10 AM
#403
Yes, MGoBlog Is . . .
2 Legit 2 Quit
March 6th, 2013 at 9:06 AM
#404
My suggestion for Bacari's
My suggestion for Bacari's pregame speech tonight...
"If you finish a game out of first after beating Sparty and Indiana because you blew it against Penn State AND Purdue, you'll take it to your fucking grave!"
Play like Michigan. BEAT. PURDUE.
March 6th, 2013 at 9:14 AM
#405
Destiny?
Luckily, there is a tournment at the end of the season where everyone controls their own destiny. Once you're on the main grid, it only takes six wins.
March 6th, 2013 at 9:48 AM
#406
True
But it only takes two wins to hang a Conference Championship banner. Let's do that first. Then we can worry about hanging a NCAA Championship banner.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:16 AM
#407
We're two wins from a
We're two wins from a conference title, folks. Go Blue, Beat Purdue!
It is fitting that the Penn State loss is virtually meaningless. I suppose if we had won, we could be playing for the conference outright, but a conference title is still a conference title. It's (almost) like that loss never happened.
Also, in a conference as tough as the Big Ten this year, it's only fitting we finish in a 4-way tie.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:34 AM
#408
Oh the Penn State loss
Oh the Penn State loss happened and we'll be feeling the repercussions of it once the seeds come out for the NCAA tourney. Still, as low as we all were last week, it's awesome to suddenly be very much alive for the conference title hunt.
Beat. Purdue.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:47 AM
#409
Something I don't understand
Something I don't understand about our Penn State loss is that a lot of people are pegging Kansas as a 1-seed when they play in a weaker conference than the Big Ten and have a worse loss (to TCU) than we do.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:52 AM
#410
I have the same confusion.
I have the same confusion. They did win at OSU and at K State, so maybe better road wins forms the rationale.
March 6th, 2013 at 11:35 AM
#411
Your ability to polish a turd
Your ability to polish a turd impresses me.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:19 AM
#412
HAIL
HAIL
March 6th, 2013 at 10:36 AM
#413
Controlling our own destiny has been our little, naughty pet
Hopefully Purdue is our "Hey, if you want me to take a dump in a box and mark it guaranteed" moment.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:42 AM
#414
Sharing is for suckers.
I want this team to be back to back conference champs like everyone else, but sharing sucks, especially with your hated rivals. Nebraska '97 is one thing, sharing with Ohio and possibly Sparty is sickening.
Go Blue
March 6th, 2013 at 10:49 AM
#415
So you'd rather lose one or
So you'd rather lose one or both of our final two games to avoid sharing with them?
I know that's not what you meant, haha. I agree that winning outright > sharing with anyone but OSU/MSU > sharing with combination of OSU/MSU > not winning one at all.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:11 PM
#416
re:sharing.
Sharing a jail cell, a spouse, or last place- bad
Sharing a championship- good
March 6th, 2013 at 11:38 AM
#417
How does the Wisconsin loss....
...and no chance to avenge, factor into this if we both have 5 losses at the end?
March 6th, 2013 at 11:48 AM
#418
Over/Under
On 3pt FG made tonight? How's Nik's face, is he active?
