Texas would be great!
that makes one of us
Texas would be great!
Hopefully we can pick up a series against USC, Stanford, Texas, or someone else like that. I was a fan of the Ohio State home and homes with USC and Texas, those would be pretty cool for us to have.
Except if my memory serves me correct, DB has made pretty clear that he doesn't like home-and-homes. Too much lost revenue from an extra home game that they could have.
But I'd kill to have a home-and-home with a solid BCS opponent like Stanford, Texas, or someone from SEC country like Georgia or Florida.
UM can now have 7 home games plus a home-and-home with a decent team.
So the full transition to the ACC begins...
The TV money loss sucks but only for those on the right side of that equation, which wouldn't be any of us. Lets get some more essss eeee ceee involved anyway. If we are gonna keep up lets play teams that matter in the national picture. Cant shy away from it anymore and we should be up to brady's expectations for his style of offense by then. If we aren't well thats a whole different issue.
I figured it was only a matter of time, although this is earlier than anticipated.
It is only logical:
The reality is that ND will likely be playing a full ACC slate soon enough, and one or two of the above games (USC, Stanford, Navy, MSU, & Purdue) will fall by the wayside.
This particular change is personally irksome, because it was always doable for Michigan fans like myself to easily travel to South Bend. For instance, I left home at 2:30pm, had plenty of time to tailgate, took a leisurely walk to the stadium, and was back home by 1am. That won't be possible in the future with many solid opponents.
However, if this opens up pairs of home and away games vs. solid teams in the Pac 10, SEC, ACC, and Big 12, I can live with it. Can you imagine a home & away schedule over 10 years including:
10 games with any five of those teams, one home and one away, in a 10 year span, would be awesome and a nice change of pace.
I also think that ND has been irritated because the financial arrangements for the Michigan series ended up being to Michigan's advantage and not Notre Dame's.
Ugh, screw you Notre Dame. What's worse, this probably doesn't leave Michigan enough time to go out and schedule a real opponent.
Bring on Savannah State.
A bunch of schools look available, actually. Oklahoma, Florida State, Georgia, Georgia Tech
GA Tech and triple option? No thanks. But its definitely be an intersting matchup for people other than those of us here (the "casual observers").
I think a lot of these big non-conference games are based on playing teams in markets that Michigan does not get as much exposure. So maybe a team in Florida would make sense. Or maybe a team out west like Cal. That would be interesting - two very good universities. How about a team like Missouri? There could be some interesting options, depending on the opponents schedules, of course.
But it would be the perfect publicity to showcase/unveil the Gerald Ford Patch! Think about it!
the state of Georgia produces the 3rd most division 1 football players, if i'm not mistaken. Behind Texas and Cali. Last I checked, we may have gotten a few players from there (David Cone, i see you!) but that's a market we could potentially benefit from.
Texas looked all tied up, but hey, I guess A&M or somebody would be a good "SEC" opponent too.
GT woldnt even make sense. Not a traditional power.
I think this is a false statement. I'm pretty sure they were a powerhouse back in the day. But by "traditional" I assume you refer to more recent history, in which case you're probably right. But I'm sure it'd be cool to do a home-and-home with them, especially for the players since the stadium is right near the middle of Atlanta. The more I think about it, the more interesting that game sounds.
You know it'd be a night game too. Capacity is kind of small, but it gets loud. and it's a pretty nice place to play. Lots going on in Atlanta... and yeah, it's pretty much in the heart of it all. (Lobbying because my girlfriend went there, and we almost never play them in much of anything.)
as the opponent which gives us the most credibility per actual difficulty of the game
i love your tag line.
"WE WANT DUKE!"-nd
Are you really Jay-Z?
Anyone think that Brandon is slyly content with this outcome, as he can now pimp the inevitable night game against ND next year as being their final at Michigan Stadium?
LSU or FSU or Florida or even Miami. Any of those would be good.
While we still have several players on our roster from both Florida and Louisiana, there aren't many in the last couple years. However, I'd rather have the best talent from wherever it comes from, and especially think it is more important to recruit Ohio well, with Illinois and Pennsylvania after that. If we are filling up with 4-stars and the occasional 5-star from Michigan and the surrounding states, we will do well.
I love the idea of Texas or Lsu. Great recruiting. I hate the idea of another Utah on our schedule. Miami might be interesting too. I used to love it when we played USC and or ucla too.
Still the most "satisfying" win for a Midwesterner has to generally be over Notre dame. Now I dislike them even more.
I wonder how much it helps recruiting to have a one-time game someplace far from your campus. If anything, I'd imagine that it helps with kids from that area who will already be playing for you by that time, because they get to go home, their families get to watch them, etc. But if you're a junior in high school someplace in Michigan, have your eyes been opened to Boise State because of that MSU game? To UMass because of that Michigan game?
To hell with NBC, ACC, BCS, & Notre Dame
i know everyone is going to be mad at ND and everything, and maybe rightly, but really this just makes me sad. college football is set apart from the NFL by special or unique things, whether it be unique traditions, tailgating, trophy games, stadiums, etc. For me, the Michigan ND series has always been special, a part of early fall. Going to games in South Bend is definitely the most unique setting in college football and it is unfortunate to lose that as a Michigan fan. When rooting for Michigan vs ND you are not only rooting for that specific team in that specific game, but also rooting to prove that Grbac to Desmond still matters and that just for a day you can erase the pain of Raghib Ismail's 2 tds. When UM is up 38, against ND you are caught between thinking "MOAR POINTZ PLEASE!" and "maybe they should hold up a bit, save some points for next year." The level of opponents that are going to be brought in are going to feel so hollow compared to ND - Pitt, Kansas, South Florida, teams that are in fact BCS level teams, but ones that you will likely never see again and don't really care about.
also, this is not so much a "i haz a sad becuz ND is gone." its more that this is one more small special thing that college football is losing in its neverending race to become NFL lite.
Finally, Beating them usually has done Michigan no good. They have been average the past 20 years. Time for a real oponent. I would start a series with Texas. On and off every two or years.
TO HELL WITH NOTRE DAME.
I'd like to take a dump on the steps of the golden dome.
I'm pretty sure doing something like that earns you an automatic trip to Hell. I'm not religious or anything, but I bet that appears in the good book somewhere. Consider yourself warned!
NBC must be thrilled at the prospects of broadcasting ND vs ACC football games. I bet the next time the contract is up for renewal, they'll be willing to fork over tens.......nay, HUNDREDS of dollars for the rights.
Can't say I'm surprised to see this happen. I love the rivarly with Notre Dame, but it'll be nice to see another game in it's place.
This rivarly isn't done. There will be more games with them in the future.
I say good riddance! Bo was right, we don't need ND, we don't want ND. Once Nebraska joined the B1G, Michigan now has enough quality opponents. In the average year, Michigan will play OSU, MSU, Wisconsin and Nebraska. The occassional non-conference tough opponent makes future UM schedules quite difficult.
Must win in South Bend in 2014...can't let them get the last laugh going into the 3 year gap.
ND doesn't want to play schools from the B1G anymore so that they can expand their "National" footprint.
This is actually good for Michigan i'd like to see Michigan start a rivalry up with Cal or Georgia, both schools matchup with us well from an academic and football perspective.
"Bite Me Irish!"
again, I've never followed Michigan when we haven't played ND, so this will be weird. On the other hand, if a good football school is free in a good recruiting area, I say let's go for it. Notre Dame did produce some crazy football moments, but if we play a nationally relevant OOC team every year instead, let's do it and not look back.
"Once we signed on to play five games against the ACC we realized it would be difficult to schedule Air Force, Army, and Navy. Thus, we have to cancel our Big 10 games so we can continue the tradition of winning the Commander-in-Chief's trophy. It's really important to uphold our tradition since we haven't won anything else since 1988."
Good riddance you pieces of shit.
Enjoy your new thrilling rivalries with duke and virginia.
I'm actually really pleased with this development. Taking ND off the schedule allows Michigan to add some variety to their OOC schedule and play team from different areas of the country.
I have much respect for ND, but this should help Michigan even out those lop-sided home/away schedules.
The only way this becomes a detriment to us is if:
1. We don't find someone equal or better to play as a replacement
2. We don't properly schedule a home/home series to avoid having a year where all big games are away
look at it this way. In the future, if we have a really crappy season, we can play ND in the Poulan Weedeater Bowl or other thrilling bowl contest. I think the ACC has some excellent bowls locked up in the future.
I don't understand why DB is so against Home and Home series. I know there is loss in revenue but think about the broader picture. The reason ND goes home and home with 2 California teams is to establish a road game close to home of your recruits.
Scheduling a game in Florida, Louisiana, Georgia, or California can be used as a HUGE recruiting tool. Think about how many kids eliminate potential schools because their families would never get to see them play.
They can go jerk around the acc for awhile
UM has a big following in Tampa, Naples & Orlando.
perfect time to go toan extra big 10 game
Is the contract available online? I'd be interested to see if there's grounds to argue this doesn't count as adequate notice and they're on the hook for 2015. Then get a settlement where we can drop 2014 without penalty.
Please Dave Brandon opt out if the 2014 game so we can send these national superstars a going away beatdown at the Big House next year.
Or we can keep it and give them two going away beatdowns.
the series resumes, hopefully the 3 year hiatus, as opposed to 2, means that Notre Dame (and MSU) would be home when OSU and Nebraska are away.
Ron Simpkins wrote a great article a week ago or so on the ND games. He said it was time to dump them. They have played the Big Ten for suckers for years. They never wanted any part of the Big Ten because they didn't want to play all the teams every year. They always like to fill the schedule with easy games and sprinkle in a few tough teams. I hope I never see another game with ND.