no comment from Denard

chengelis

Denard Robinson spoke for sec. Told reporters meeting with Hoke was "good" #Michigan 5 minutes ago via web

The countless number of people wasting hours and hours looking for every bit of information need something to chew on!  

Seriously

Ryan Mallett agrees

-1 mgopoint

Everyone please take a mental note that mgrowold should be at 8223 mgopoints.

I few hundred posters with new MGoBlog accounts will probably disagree with you.

are you eight years old or do you just happen to be this insufferable?

I don't know if someone hijacked your account or something, but you have gone from one of my preferred posters to absolutely insufferable the past couple days. Jesus Christ, at least try and keep your shit together.

I would love to see some sort of comprimise between the rigid pro-style everyone is expecting and the "spread and shred" we have seen the last 3 years.  I think getting Denard in space on roll outs and what not will allow him to use his legs and arm to make plays. I honestly don't think running him as much as last year would be a good thing.  Also, if Denard can show he can be successful in a pro-style type offense I think that would increase his chances of making it to the NFL as a QB. 

Yes his biggest strength is his dual threat, but he proved this past year that he can throw the ball.  Yes, he made some awful reads in the passing game which resulted in interceptions, but you have to remember that he probably spent a lot of practice time through the weeks working on running plays.  all I'm saying is if he is put in the situaltion where his primary job is to read defenses and throw the ball, then that is what he will work on the most in practices and I think that will result in fewer interceptions.  I just don't see why he can't continue to develop his game at Michigan. 

that Hoke wants to use a "west coast" offense .... which in my mind would be great for Denard.  It s used in the NFL which would be viewed positively by scouts.

I would also descibe what Auburn runs as a version of the west coast offense.  I have seen several posters talk about Auburn's offense as a spread, which Oregon's is, but with Newton more of a pocket passer and few plays other than a QB draw designed for him to run, makes it look more like west coast to me.

Go Blue !

Amen

Whether denard can be successful in a pro style offense remains to be seen, but i personally think he would be more effective on scrambles and could gain far more yards than always doing a QB iso..

This past year the qb iso's became so predictable because we don't have much of a threat at the RB position.  It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.  The spring game will probably give us a pretty good glimpse

Coaches work with the players they have. They'll do everything to keep Denard here and he'll be the quarterback if he stays. Why do you assume he won't be here? Because they won't be running spread options? Deanard's a quarterback and wants to play quarterback. He can do it out of the spread or out of a shotgun pro-style. The passing aspects of the two offenses are not that different. He can succeed in either. Andrew Luck had over 700 yards rushing this season out of a pro-style offense, and he isn't nearly as athletic as Denard. And it isn't as if Denard should run the ball twenty times a game, no matter the offense. Ten to twelve should be the max coming from designed runs. Borges's quarterbacks never had any rushing yards because they couldn't run. That's pretty easy to see. At least give the staff a chance, instead of assuming all is lost because we didn't bring in a proven winner.

If the players were as pessimistic as this fanbase is, they wouldn't win a game next season.

Coaches work with the players they have. They'll do everything to keep Denard here and he'll be the quarterback if he stays. Why do you assume he won't be here? Because they won't be running spread options? Deanard's a quarterback and wants to play quarterback. He can do it out of the spread or out of a shotgun pro-style. The passing aspects of the two offenses are not that different. He can succeed in either. Andrew Luck had over 700 yards rushing this season out of a pro-style offense, and he isn't nearly as athletic as Denard. And it isn't as if Denard should run the ball twenty times a game, no matter the offense. Ten to twelve should be the max coming from designed runs. Borges's quarterbacks never had any rushing yards because they couldn't run. That's pretty easy to see. At least give the staff a chance, instead of assuming all is lost because we didn't bring in a proven winner.

If the players were as pessimistic as this fanbase is, they wouldn't win a game next season.

Coaches work with the players they have. They'll do everything to keep Denard here and he'll be the quarterback if he stays. Why do you assume he won't be here? Because they won't be running spread options? Deanard's a quarterback and wants to play quarterback. He can do it out of the spread or out of a shotgun pro-style. The passing aspects of the two offenses are not that different. He can succeed in either. Andrew Luck had over 700 yards rushing this season out of a pro-style offense, and he isn't nearly as athletic as Denard. And it isn't as if Denard should run the ball twenty times a game, no matter the offense. Ten to twelve should be the max coming from designed runs. Borges's quarterbacks never had any rushing yards because they couldn't run. That's pretty easy to see. At least give the staff a chance, instead of assuming all is lost because we didn't bring in a proven winner.

If the players were as pessimistic as this fanbase is, they wouldn't win a game next season.

while I love Brian and what he has done at his site, I have stopped giving much credence to his views on Michigan coaches.  

Brain's front-page post has no bearing on whether Michigan will be able to utilize Denard.  None of those teams had a similar talent.