Sinsemillaplease

March 5th, 2013 at 8:39 AM ^

Some people just hate uniform changes. Just because most of ours look terrible and our uniform is iconic doesn't mean every change for every team should be met with criticism. I thnk they look great and don't change too much.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2013 at 9:15 AM ^

Other than the facemask strip, these are terrific. It's not like they just redid Texas, Penn State, or Michigan.

Wolverine9773

March 5th, 2013 at 10:04 AM ^

I have no issues with the way Adidas has done Michigan's uniforms. In my opinion the trademark of the athletic teams has been and will always be the winged helmet. As long as that stays true then I don't really care how the shirts or pants look. I may get blasted for this, but I kind of liked the matte finished helmets in the bowl game. Keep the numbers off though. That's my 2 cents.

Stike A Pose

March 5th, 2013 at 1:30 PM ^

Personally, I like them.  Also, this isn't Nike's doing, it's obviously a rebranding attempt by OSU.  It's not like Nike said "we're going to completely rebrand Oregon State and there's nothing they can do about it!"

As much as people want to bitch and moan about uniforms, it seems like this trend is here to stay regardless of the brand.  I personally think Nike products in general are better than Adidas products, but to each their own.  Not everyone has to agree with me.  I will say that as much crap as the "bleed out" jersey's got, they were the first Adidas product that I actually liked.  Plus look at the MSU game.  The student section was game for the Maize out for once, and it looked pretty bad ass with the bleed out jerseys.