New Scoreboards: Not THAT Much Larger

Submitted by Max on

Many of you may have already seen this as it was in a video sent out by the Alumni Association, but here is a visualization of how the new scoreboards will compare to the old:

I'm certainly not complaining, and I still can't wait to see these on Saturdays, but this definitely falls short of the size upgrade I think most of us had in mind.  If you'll recall, this is the size difference Brian suggested we'd see:

Old:

New:

 

Edit - Christ, you guys can be frustrating.  See the explicit note that I'm not upset nor disappointed about this -- I simply thought they were going to be larger.

Don

July 28th, 2011 at 10:35 PM ^

The new screen is over twice the size of the old screen. The OP was apparently forgetting that the video screen on the old scoreboard didn't even take up half its size.

When people see the new boards in person for the first time they're going to shit their pants.

Blazefire

July 28th, 2011 at 10:32 PM ^

Let's say that the old board had standard resolution of 640 x 480. It was indeed standard resolution, though obviously at that size it had higher numbers, but I degress. Let's make the argument. Let's also assume the new HD boards are a widescreen 1280x720.

This is 2 x 1.5 times greater definition. IF the board is three times as wide by twice as high (moe than that, but again, argument's sake), that becomes 6 x 3 times the total display area or the capacity to display more that 18 times as much visual data. Epic.

UMxWolverines

July 28th, 2011 at 11:17 PM ^

Here's the thing. No, they're not THAT much bigger than the old ones in total size, but in screen size the difference is huge. THAT is what matters. Besides, ours won't be full of advertisements and they'll still be in the top 10 biggest in college football. Take a look at Wisconsin's. The structure is huge, yet half the space is advertising:

joeyb

July 28th, 2011 at 11:51 PM ^

By my extremely accurate calculations, the new replay screen (which is what everyone cares about) will be about 5.4x bigger than the old one.  So...yea, it's kind of a big deal.

Franz Schubert

July 29th, 2011 at 6:46 AM ^

As the OP stated, they are smaller than Brians mock up. Yes, they are bigger and very nice but even if you consider only the screen size, clearly there is a bigger difference in size in Brians .

RowoneEndzone

July 29th, 2011 at 8:16 AM ^

You are right. Brian's had the new one about twice the height of the old and that is not the case. OP is right in that sense but I am still very happy about the size of the new boards. Can't wait to see them.

blueblueblue

July 29th, 2011 at 9:12 AM ^

Any judgments on the size of the new boards should only be made after seeing them in person. I took a look in person yesterday, and they quite impressive. They are as big as they can be without being monstrosities.

I think perhaps penis size correlates with perception of the size of the scoreboards. You just find yourself wanting everything to be bigger. 

HAIL 2 VICTORS

July 29th, 2011 at 10:51 AM ^

This is talking about the scoreboards?

I'd want to see the pair of them together before drawing any conclusions about their size.  Also, we haven't really had a chance to see the backside.  So I'm reserving judgment, but excited to see everything live.

mfanfromohio

July 29th, 2011 at 11:42 AM ^

is the size of our score compared to our opponents.  Hopefully, our new D will prevent the latter from increasing at a video game score rate this year.