Football Display Case
like I said on twitter: that was almost as intense as Iowa NIT games
...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)
Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.
Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition
just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.
this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech
no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE
not a surprise
premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader
Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.
i approve of this message
strong indictment of AAU right heah
Glockner sides with justice
a good cause, and a good time
I am not surprised at all by this junk. These people will never acknowledge that their old coach was an unethical person. I hope to God Pitt rails them when they play again in 2016 and 2017. I am looking forward to those games more than any and its 2012.
So true though saveferris
F*#k State College....and oh yeah, beat Nebraska
First off, I would encourage no one to waste their time with this video. In summary, the video jumps around interviews connecting them to make it seem like there is not conclusive evidence that concealement occurs.
I can't believe Franco Harris agreed to do this documentary as well as some Board of Trustee members. I wonder if he is still happy he participated.
The common thing about the interviews is inconsistenty. They argue there was confusion of the sexual terms used by Mcquery and Patterno during their explanations.
At one point the producer of this video, makes the comment that no sexual act occured in the shower because the victim withdrew the claim at a later date.
?!?!?!!What are you talking about?
This video trys to defend Sandusky. I am flabbergasted that this person is still making these claims. I am glad that this presentation could not be censored on the internet because it is a reminder to me that people from my home will still make these claims. With that said, most PSU graduates do not think like this producer.
Two decent claims he made:
The University did not have a person who could speak for them with all the leaders of the school being eliminated. However, why couldn't the chairman of the board step up and fill that void?
The other is that the media did not pursue Sandusky to interview like they did with Patterno.On the other hand, what about the Bob Costas interview?
I know another board member at the university, and he has condemned Patterno. Isn't it funny that only one board member agreed to do this video?
He does make the correct claim that Patterno built the pride the school has. Without Patterno, PSU would be largely an irrelevant farm school. A nice parallel would be Thomas Jefferson built the US, but it doesn't change the fact that he was a racist.
This video shows that we have a few ppl who are still trying to save the image of Patterno at all costs. As a Pennsylvania resident, I hope my state's public institution can recover from this scandal, and I hope people learn from it and build a better place to learn and play football.
by one of the major networks after a fierce bidding war. Whether it gets renewed--Iess certain about that. The public is so fickle.
This producer is known as creating ridiculous stories and videos. See earlier posts in this thread?