blueblueblue

April 5th, 2010 at 10:13 AM ^

Cox looks great - like a nice mix of Minor-esque angry running, shiftiness, and balance. It will be great to see big Cox do some damage in September.

MGoAlumnus

April 5th, 2010 at 10:21 AM ^

I loved the read that Denard made at around 1:30, hopefully that translates over to actual games. Also, is it just me that wants to give Calvin Magee a big ol' hug?

Mattinboots

April 5th, 2010 at 10:31 AM ^

As much as I like watching our offense do well, I'd much rather see our slot receivers getting lit up by the DBs and LBs on those short passes, especially over the middle; or seeing the LBs plug a hole up tight. I know this was mostly an offensive highlight reel, but I don't really care about those highlights because I know we're capable on offense. Show me some spectacular defensive plays!

WolvinLA2

April 5th, 2010 at 12:56 PM ^

Like you said, this was an offensive video, so they are going to show the good offensive plays. Since they are going against our defense, that's just going to mean that those will also be bad plays by our defense. The last video was empasizing the defense, so go watch that one. Then again, there were people complaining after that video that our offense looked bad (hello). If you don't want to see bad plays by either unit, DO NOT watch them play against each other. Chances are it will happen at least once on every play.

MGoShoe

April 5th, 2010 at 1:10 PM ^

...much sense. I prefer to hyperventilate about snippets from practice. I prefer that all running plays feature big gainers from Shaw and Cox where they break tackles and make defenders miss and all of those plays should be blown up at the line of scrimmage by our front 8(?). I also prefer that all passes should be in stride completions from Tate, DRob or Denard to a streaking slot ninja or WR running a go route and all of those plays should also feature one of our "No Fly Zone" defenders laying the wood on a receiver and/or a pick six. It is unacceptable that the offense should outshine the defense and it is just as unacceptable that the defense should outshine the offense!

Blazefire

April 5th, 2010 at 10:49 AM ^

Tate - Finally stepping UP in the pocket BEFORE scrambling, and hitting every single receiver square in the numbers. Excellent. Denard - Still not dead accurate downfield, but close enough that the balls all seemed catchable (and caught). Plus some excellent runs. Gardner - No arm injury, and a beautiful scramble all the way to the end zone. Cox - Will crush all. O-line - Really seemed to know their assignments and help the backs get a few open steps to get started. I am pleased.

Fresh Meat

April 5th, 2010 at 11:50 AM ^

I was mostly going off of the o-line. When you see Schilling out there, I assume that's the ones. Also, Tate was usually going against the one's on D, which usually the two one's don't face off. It's entirely possible i'm wrong, but I would say based on probabilities of who is starting at other positions, I'm likely not.

WolvinLA2

April 5th, 2010 at 1:06 PM ^

If Cam Gordon is the surprise of 2010 defensively, I'd say Mike Cox is the surprise on O. He's looked strong on all the plays I've seen of him, and he must be doing that often since he gets more video time than any of the other backs. He looks big and strong while at the same time shifty and speedy. With the number of backs we have right now, I knew someone would step up. I still want to see FT light the world on fire though.

tjyoung

April 5th, 2010 at 3:56 PM ^

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the hit that Kelvin Grady lays at about the 2:55 mark yet. That thing is sick. Who does he lay out?

MGoShoe

April 5th, 2010 at 7:09 PM ^

...is something to behold. He seems to have the uncanny ability to stay upright when he has no business not to be on the ground. Bodes well for him getting more touches this year.