ND Recruiting is back - Five 5-stars (3 DEs)

Submitted by jtmc33 on

ND got the pledge of a 5-star DE from Georgia yesterday.  That gives them five 5-stars in this class and essentially locks them into a top-3 class

http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=8&toinid=704&yr=2011

Obviously, at least one of these large DEs will slide to DT, you are looking at a future line with three 5-star recruits.  

Defense first in South Bend.

MGolem

January 20th, 2011 at 9:40 AM ^

Why would any big time recruit go to ND? If you want great academics go to Michigan. If you want to live in the middle of nowhere go to Alabama or Auburn, at least then you don't have to freeze your ass off. I understand ND has a name but they have not been relevant for the majority of these kids lives. This is a program that lost to Navy (again) and Tulsa. You can't tell me all these kids are Catholic. Not to mention the program seems to be run by some shady characters.

Clayzer

January 20th, 2011 at 9:52 AM ^

This might be a little bit of a simplified view. There are many great academic institutions around, including Notre Dame. Hell, we all laughed (or at least I did) when Myron Rolle chose FSU for their academics and he ended up a Rhodes Scholar

friendlyNeighb…

January 20th, 2011 at 10:26 AM ^

i'm obviously not an elite recruit, but some of the things that recruits mention:

1. academics. not just in the sense of the school's academic reputation, but in the sense that football players are well educated and leave the place with a degree.

2. post-graduation opportunities. nd almuni are a famously close bunch and tend to take care of their own. nd does very well in the national rankings (ie: us news) largely because a huge chunk of the alumni give money to the place and give a lot of it, for example.

3. religion. not catholocism per se, but its important to some guys that the school has a strong religious identity.

4. parents. this one is often very important. but, through a combination of 1-3 and a general sense that their kid is less likely to get into serious trouble at nd, its often the case that the kid wants to go to good-weather-hot-chicks school and the parent wants them to go to nd, stay out of trouble, go to church and graduate.

5. exposure. the magnitude of this benefit has diminished over time, but there is still a relevant advantage. there is no such thing as a hugely successful player at nd that isn't well known nationally. 

6. new coaches. this is the one upside of changing coaches every 3 years. you can always pitch kids on a narrative that things are going in the right direction and that they can get in on the ground floor, get early playing time etc.

Wolfman

January 20th, 2011 at 11:15 AM ^

the Ty W. years. Frontal Ass always had great success at recruiting; he simply didn't know what to do with it. Anyone that can pull a 5* Samoan into SB has to be considered a great recruiter, but that's a small example. His speciality was somehow getting the top ranked qb for his offense every year, and the 5* rbs and OLmen didn't hurt either.

The one real thing that has returned to ND is a coach.

Salinger

January 20th, 2011 at 10:52 AM ^

I'm going to have to emphatically disagree here.  People go to ND because it has national recognition.  They have the NBC contract which guarantees they are on television every week.  If they play away, ABC or ESPN almost always picks up the game.  

On top of that, despite the fact that they have not been in the national hunt for some time, they get talked about based on talent almost every year.  They still send plenty of players to the NFL.  

Combine those points with a top notch education (perhaps even better than U of M's depending on the field) and you are talking about an all-around great collegiate experience.  

Don't get me wrong, I hope we stomp them into the ground.  I'm just saying...

Eat Your Wheatlies

January 20th, 2011 at 9:40 AM ^

It was weird how the Stephon Tuitt thing played out. Kid was a ND commit until a few days ago when he switched to GT, now hes back with the Domers 2 days later. I feel like Kelly told him that Jesus wouldnt love him if he went to Georgia Tech...

QVIST

January 20th, 2011 at 9:45 AM ^

I hate that I like Brian Kelly. I know he's the enemy. I know he makes win-at-all-cost decisions (see: QB concussions vs. Michigan), but he is from my area and is a great coach. People around here and who have played for him at GVSU talk very highly of him.

Bluerock

January 20th, 2011 at 9:49 AM ^

ND got better as the season went on and beat some teams that in previous years they might not have beaten, couple that with top 5 classes.....ugh... ND looks like a load.....beer sales going  up in pubs all across America.

oHOWiHATEohioSTATE

January 20th, 2011 at 10:08 AM ^

They lost some close games early. They got blown out by Navy and lost to Tulsa relatively late in the year. They did beat a USC team that was having a down year and a Miami team that was over rated to start the year in the bowl game. I'm not saying they didn't improve but they had a favorable schedule to say the least.

blue note

January 20th, 2011 at 9:52 AM ^

Even though Charlie's defenses always sucked, I feel like they had a lot of highly recruited players... T'eo was a 5-star.

Looks like they will have pretty good personel for a 3-4 in the upcoming future.

King Douche Ornery

January 20th, 2011 at 10:03 AM ^

But I CAN'T QUIT YOU, RECRUITING!

Notre Dame is, I am afraid, on a path of destruction. Kelly is a damn good football coach. Period.

Michigan is behind the 8-ball here, as others have mentioned. But we're taking good steps--starting, hopefully, with Mattison as the DC.

GoBlueX2

January 20th, 2011 at 10:24 AM ^

Their kicker commit for the 2011 class is very, very good. Wish he would have went blue, saw him play live and it was unreal.

Hopefully we will get a solid kicker ourselves/

Captain Obvious

January 20th, 2011 at 10:33 AM ^

Where did it go?  It never left.

The real question is whether talent development and success is back at ND.  There is some evidence from last year to suggest this is the case, but the jury is definitely still out.  BK is a pretty terrible in-game coach and made some very Weis-like decisions.  They also lost to some pretty crappy teams.  Wait and see if their success from later in 2010 carries over to next year; then you can begin to worry that they hired someone good.

bryemye

January 20th, 2011 at 10:43 AM ^

It is really strange how ND has consistently been pulling world-beater classes and then being so-so on the field.

Three 5-stars on the D-Line is pretty impressive though.

blueheron

January 20th, 2011 at 11:07 AM ^

Not that it matters too much here, but remember that Scout is more generous with stars than Rivals (which has 2, instead of 5, 5-star recruits listed for them).

7NK7

January 20th, 2011 at 11:08 AM ^

until they win and keep winning. recruits are great, and obviously the better they are helps too. but lets be honest here, ND hasnt had the best 15 years and until they compete for the BCS then they are NOT back...

Yooper

January 20th, 2011 at 11:32 AM ^

For the first time in a long time ND has a professional coach with a history of success as a head coach.  I think he will do well.  Look for many parallels to be made between Hoke and Kelly.