Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (48)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 10 hours ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 23 hours ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 day ago
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 1 day ago
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 3 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,533 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 781 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 656 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 630 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 628 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 17 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 12 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    14 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    29 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    62 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    20 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    110 replies
  • Our footballs are made in the USA but not in Ohio
    27 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    37 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    58 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    26 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    50 replies
  • Rivals 250 notes
    56 replies
  • ESPN: Michigan BBall article featuring GRIII.
    6 replies
  • Arkansas QB Mitchell to NC State
    24 replies
  • Detroit Lions to start new bowl pitting Big Ten vs. ACC in 2014
    45 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    114 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    29 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    14 replies
  • Our footballs are made in the USA but not in Ohio
    27 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    20 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    37 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    62 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    110 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    58 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    26 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    75 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    50 replies
  • Detroit Lions to start new bowl pitting Big Ten vs. ACC in 2014
    45 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    114 replies
  • ESPN: Trey Burke Articles/Video/Fluff/Etc.
    12 replies
  • OT: End of Drew and Mike on 101WRIF
    40 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    114 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    110 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    75 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    2 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

NCAA Tournament seeding possibilities

36 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
March 9th, 2012 at 1:05 AM
#1
BeatOSU52
BeatOSU52's picture
Joined: 11/14/2011
MGoPoints: 590
NCAA Tournament seeding possibilities

Going into the game Friday against Minnesota, I am interested in hearing what your thoughts are on Michigan seeding possibilities are based on how Michigan does in the conference tourney.

 

I think most people can agree Michigan is a firm 3 seed if the season ended now (end of Thursday).

 

Here is what I think:

Michigan loses to Minnesota.  Result:  4 seed

Michigan beats Minnesota and then loses in semi-finals.  Result: 3 seed

Michigan loses in the finals.  Result: 3 seed

Michigan wins tourney.  Result: 2 seed

 

 

...I think some of this obviously depends on how other teams do that are in contention for these seeds

We're not teaching them about sports, we're teaching them about life!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • basketball

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 9th, 2012 at 1:18 AM | I think a 2 seed is a tough get (Score:3 Normal)
jdon
jdon's picture
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 584

We HAVE to beat state and OSU to get a 2 in my opinion...

 

We are the dead.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 1:20 AM | Number 1 overall seed, this (Score:4 Normal)
ILwolverine
Joined: 02/24/2011
MGoPoints: 977

Number 1 overall seed, this is Michigan fergosakes!

This might be arrogant, and if it is, it is, but we're Michigan

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 1:30 AM | How about a number one (Score:3 Normal)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10370

Even if it's one of those two schools I dislike immensely, if any of the co-champions win the Big Ten Tournament, they should have a chance at a number one seed.  I am willing to concede UK and 'Cuse as obvious number one seeds, but that leaves two that could be wide open.  

If they win, UNC should be a number one, and Kansas should be a number one.  If either loses, though, the Big Ten Tournament Champion should get their slot over Duke or Mizzou.  

I am guessing, though, that the ACC gets a number one if UNC or Duke wins their tournament.  The Big 12, though, shouldn't get the benefit of the doubt here.  I think the Big Ten has been a lot tougher conference this year because of a lot more depth, and any of this year's "Big Three" should get the nod over Mizzou or Baylor if they win the Big Ten Tournament.  

 

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 7:53 AM | 8 losses makes a 1 seed tough (Score:1 Insightful)
StephenRKass
StephenRKass's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 4206

8 losses makes a 1 seed tough. Yes, 4 losses were to top 25 teams (Duke, IU, MSU, OSU.) But te other four will hurt us:

  • Iowa (unranked)
  • Arkansas (unranked)
  • Virginia (unranked)
  • Purdue (unranked)

Even the fact that we had to go to OT twice to NW is hard, considering they just played themselves out of their best chance to make the tourney.

A three seed is about right, unless we run the gauntlet and win the Big 10 Tourney. At that point, I guess we could be a two seed.

"It does not matter how many times you get knocked down, but how many times you get up." Vince Lombardi

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 10:55 AM | Catch-22.  Agreed the 8 (Score:2 Normal)
707oxford
707oxford's picture
Joined: 02/13/2012
MGoPoints: 692

Catch-22.  Agreed the 8 losses would make it tough to get a 1-seed, but if M was to win the B1G tourney as one of the regular season co-champs of supposedly the best conference in the country, I can see the argument.  Not saying it would happen, but just sayin'.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 12:11 PM | I think someone has a (Score:1)
Willhouse
Willhouse's picture
Joined: 07/22/2011
MGoPoints: 431

I think someone has a personal vendetta against you, bro.

I think we get a 3-seed as long as we win at least one game. If we win the tournament, we might sneak in to a 2-seed slot. I think we would definitely deserve it, because we would basically be 2-1 vs MSU and OSU and have the regular season and conference tournament titles in the best conference. Just not sure if the powers that be would agree with me (and us).

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 8:02 AM | Baylor is not getting a one (Score:1)
MAIZEandBLUE2002
MAIZEandBLUE2002's picture
Joined: 10/08/2010
MGoPoints: 1784

Baylor is not getting a one seed if they win. They will get a 2 seed at best. If Mizzou beats KU in the finals, if they meet of course, than I think Mizzou will take KUs place as a 1 seed. UNC should run through the acc tourney, leaving the door open for possible a big ten team getting the last 1 seed.

THOSE WHO STAY WILL BE CHAMPIONS

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 9:47 AM | Syracuse and Kentucky are 1 (Score:2 Insightful)
VermontMichiganFan
VermontMichiganFan's picture
Joined: 02/23/2012
MGoPoints: 128

Syracuse and Kentucky are 1 locks.

Duke/UNC will have one

Kansas/Mizzou wil have one

Unless somehow all 4 of those teams fail to make the conference finals we have no shot at a 1.  And chance all four of those teams lose and we beat OSU and MSU is very small.  And even if it happens the above teams may very well still have the edge.  We can get a 2- but absolutely no chance at a 1 in my mind.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 1:41 AM | I'd have to think the winner (Score:2 Normal)
mackbru
mackbru's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3066

I'd have to think the winner of the B10 tourney gets a #1 seed as long as that winner is one of the three league co-champs. I can't see, say, M or Ohio beating Sparty only to get a lower seed. Makes no sense.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 1:56 AM | I think there's less than a (Score:2 Informative)
bacon1431
bacon1431's picture
Joined: 07/26/2008
MGoPoints: 3283

I think there's less than a .01% chance we get a 1 seed. We'd need alot of help. All of Kansas, Mizzou, Duke, UNC would have to lose early and ugly in their conference tourneys. So would MSU IMO. Even if we beat them in the B1G CG, they would be more likely to get a 1 seed because their resume is more impressive than ours. I agree with the OP on his take on our seeding chances. We're a 3 seed as long as we don't lose tomorrow. Win the conference tourney while beating OSU and MSU and we're a 2.

For a' that, an' a' that, 
Our toils obscure an' a' that, 
The rank is but the guinea's stamp, 
The man's the gowd for a' that. 
  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 7:16 AM | Michigan State (Score:1 Normal)
Lampuki22
Joined: 09/16/2009
MGoPoints: 766

lost, actually blew, the last two games of the season. The fact that they didn't drop further and some are talking about them as 1 seed if they win the BTT astounds me. 

They were never a deep team and they have 13 points of ftheir offense sidelined with injuries. 

I see them as 2-3 seed no matter how well they do in the BTT.  Ohio State doesn't deserve a 1 seed either. 

However, even if we beat Spartina in the tournment they will still get a t least the same or higher seed as we do.  They are still riding on past glory. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 9:31 AM | Still riding on past (Score:1)
bacon1431
bacon1431's picture
Joined: 07/26/2008
MGoPoints: 3283

Still riding on past glory.......

And a damn good basketball team and resume. I see them as a 2 seed unless they lose their first game today and Neither Kansas or Mizzou win their conference tournament and MSU wins ours.

For a' that, an' a' that, 
Our toils obscure an' a' that, 
The rank is but the guinea's stamp, 
The man's the gowd for a' that. 
  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 1:46 AM | No shot at a 1 seed (Score:2)
kingrichardx
kingrichardx's picture
Joined: 05/28/2009
MGoPoints: 345

I agree with the logic that the winner of the B1G regular season and tourney should have a shot at a 1-seed but this is an odd year. It's highly unusual for a team with 5 conference losses to be the regular season champion. Even though it might "feel" like we should be a top seed the tournament committee is going to have a very hard time giving that distinction to a team with 8 losses. 

It's a shame too because if you take the Iowa and Arkansas losses off the board I think that it would still be well within the realm of possibility. It's obviously been an absolutely amazing year but Iowa has kinda peed in our fruit loops.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 2:05 AM | I agree (Score:2 Normal)
radfan5
radfan5's picture
Joined: 07/24/2011
MGoPoints: 193

If we win the BIG tourny, i believe we would be a 2 seed.  There is nothing wrong with being a 2 or furthermore a 3 seed. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 2:09 AM | It's pretty phenominal... (Score:5 Normal)
Tucson Wolverine
Joined: 03/09/2012
MGoPoints: 3

...that we can even talk about Michigan getting a number 2 seed as a realistic possibility. Who would have thought our boys would finish the season 23-8 with no Darius Morris. It truly has been one heck of a year and I can't wait to see how far this team will go in the BTT and into March Madness. Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 6:43 AM | After we narrowly escaped WIU (Score:2 Normal)
bleep bloop
bleep bloop's picture
Joined: 08/05/2010
MGoPoints: 1727

After we narrowly escaped WIU at home I was kind of already thinking that this would just be an okay year and I was awaiting the arrival of one Mitch McGary. Looking back I was an idiot to judge that early, and I'm excited to see that Stu and Zack finish their careers with apiece of the Big Ten Championship (and hopefully make it far in the tournaments).

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 2:17 AM | I'd almost rather be a #3 (Score:2 Normal)
robmorren2
robmorren2's picture
Joined: 06/04/2011
MGoPoints: 1544

I'd almost rather be a #3 .... there isn't much of a difference from a #2, and you have a good chance of playing a #11 in the 2nd round. It seems like #11's win very often. The #2 seed plays the winner of 7vs10, which is usually 2 good teams .... 6, 7, 10's are usually from major conferences, 11's are usually mid-majors. I'd like to roll the dice and root for an 11 to beat a 6.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 6:45 AM | 11s beating 6s (Score:2)
Larry
Joined: 12/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20

Statistically, that's the most common first-round upset since the NCAA went to 64 teams in 1985.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 7:18 AM | Interesting, even more common (Score:1)
RONick
Joined: 02/04/2009
MGoPoints: 656

Interesting, even more common than 9 seeds "upsetting" 8 seeds?!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 6:54 AM | 11 seeds beating 6s (Score:4 Normal)
Larry
Joined: 12/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20

That's actually the most common first-round upset since the NCAA went to the 64-team format in 1985.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 7:19 AM | Are you a robot? (Score:1)
Lordfoul
Lordfoul's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1456

nm

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 8:16 AM | We (Score:3 Normal)
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2785

are a 3 seed.  You look up 3 seed in the dictionary and there is the team picture for the 2011-2012 Michigan basketball team.  I really don't think anything can happen in the BTT, including a loss the Minny or winning the whole damn thing that will result in Michigan not being a 3 seed in the tourney.  And that is right where I personally want to be.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 8:39 AM | I think (Score:1)
MichiganMan2424
Joined: 03/09/2011
MGoPoints: 1021

I think people are overstating the importance of winning the B1G tournament for NCAA seeding. Our tournament ends only about 30 minutes before the seeds are announced I think. That doesn't give them much time to adjust and give us a new seeding if we win. I think getting to the title game might help our seeding more than winning it.

Practice makes perfect. Unless you're the Buckeyes. Then you have to cheat.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 8:40 AM | Likely a 3 (Score:1)
ClearEyesFullHart
ClearEyesFullHart's picture
Joined: 09/09/2011
MGoPoints: 803

I think realistically a 2 seed is the ceiling for the big 10. Nobody is breaking into the top 4. I look at the BTT as a prize in itself, not a means to an end. Mostly I want to outperform a couple of "state" schools. When people say that they're better than Michigan, that Michigan "lucked" into a championship, I want them to look as stupid as possible.

Omnes i facere est vincere 
  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 8:46 AM | I personally think the OP has (Score:2)
mGrowOld
mGrowOld's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 13168

I personally think the OP has it exactly right as far as our win/loss and projected seeding goes.  But any talk of a freakin one seed truly makes me laugh.  That has 0.00% chance of happening and I don't care what combination of losses occur elsewhere.  We should be beyond thrilled to even be in the discussion for a two seed with eight losses.

Trust me - if we do somehow get made a second seed on Sunday we will definitely be the subject of much chatter by the respective talking heads immediately afterwards.  I mean right after they all wax poetic over the INJUSTICE of poor Drexell not getting a bid (and they won't) despite their nice long winning streak over...um...nobody.   You don't get the 222 hardest strength of schedule ranking for nothing.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 9:10 AM | 3 seed is most likely (Score:1)
rappjason
rappjason's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 238

in fact, a 3 may still be in the cards if we lose to MN tonight, depending on other results.

 

after that, a 4 is more likely than a 2. i seem to remember seeing something in years past about how the committee generally doesn't have time to take the B1G tournament final result into account when determining final seedings. i don't have anything to back this up, just my flawed memory; but if my recollection is correct, then only if getting to the B1G final is sufficient wil we get a 2. i'm not optimistic this will be enough for us.

 

long story short, i'd say the odds are 75% for a 3, 20% for a 4 and 5% for a 2. what a world!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 9:10 AM | 1 seed is incredibly unlikely (Score:1)
Jorel
Jorel's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 119

But a 2 seed is definitely possible. If we beat OSU to reach the conf finals (having beaten them twice this year), it's possible we move past them just for that. Win the whole thing and we're definitely a 2 seed ahead of them.

I also think a 3 seed is on the line today for Michigan. Win and we got it; lose and we could slip to 4. Marquette and Georgetown lost and, barring an ACC championship from Florida State in which it beats UNC and Duke, I think the only threat to earn a 3 seed other than the four teams universally on that line (Baylor, Mich, Marquette, Georgetown) is the Indiana / Wisconsin winner. Since Marquette and Georgetown already lost one (Georgetown) would be more likely to slip to a 4 than Michigan would. But if Michigan loses to Minn, we could slip below Georgetown on the S-curve.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 9:24 AM | Think people are overestimating (Score:3 Insightful)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

the impact of conference tournaments.  If Michigan loses to Minnesota, I could see them sliding to a 4, but I'm not sure they're in line for a 2 even if they win out.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 9:52 AM | Indiana and Wisconsin (Score:1)
DCAlum
Joined: 01/30/2012
MGoPoints: 213

They are biting at our heels to grab that 3 seed. I could see a scenario where we lose to Ohio, one of them beats MSU, and we drop to a 4.

 

That said, G-town's loss last night was very helpful for our 3 seed chances. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 10:39 AM | There are too many scenarios here (Score:1)
jwilkins3
Joined: 01/28/2011
MGoPoints: 83

Win tonight and we are a three. Thats good enough for me considering the huge waves we made this year. I think that any seed from 2 through 4 will happen and it doesnt really matter because when it comes to the NCAA tournament anything can happen. 10 and 7 seeds beat 2's in the second round quite frequent in the men's tourney. And the relatively close comparisons of 4/5 and 3/6 matchups in the second round are always fun to watch so whatever we get it will not be as easy beyond the first round.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 10:54 AM | Confused (Score:1)
GoBlueInIowa
GoBlueInIowa's picture
Joined: 03/05/2011
MGoPoints: 384

So, as a Michigan fan you want a loss to Ohio? Confused

 

"No man is more important than The Team. No coach is more important than The Team. The Team, The Team, The Team"

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 10:56 AM | Sorry - wrong thread - meant (Score:1)
GoBlueInIowa
GoBlueInIowa's picture
Joined: 03/05/2011
MGoPoints: 384

Sorry - wrong thread - meant to respond to the one where the guy didn't want us to win the B1G tourney

 

"No man is more important than The Team. No coach is more important than The Team. The Team, The Team, The Team"

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 11:21 AM | Gotta root for Duke and (Score:1)
Sons of Louis Elbel
Joined: 11/21/2011
MGoPoints: 340

Gotta root for Duke and Mizzou to lose early. I think we can manage to do that...

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 11:42 AM | I think (Score:1)
Wolverine In Exile
Wolverine In Exile's picture
Joined: 11/08/2008
MGoPoints: 2147

bottom expectation is a 4 seed with a bad loss today, high expectation is a favorable 2 seed with a B1G tourney championship (expecially if wins over OSU and MSU), realistic is a lower 3 seed after either a loss to OSU in the semis or MSU in the finals. B1G isn't getting a 1 seed unless Kansas and / or UNC stumbles and OSU steamrolls through the tourney (which would be wins over Purdue, us, and Mich St.. pretty good close out ot the year).

"So I come out of Ohio Stadium after we beat the Buckeyes, and right there on the hood of my friend's car, some one took a dump, in the shape of an 'O'. no shit. Oh, sorry, bad pun."

  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 12:49 PM | I agree with the 4 seed and 3 (Score:1)
YouremyboyBlue
YouremyboyBlue's picture
Joined: 12/13/2010
MGoPoints: 62

I agree with the 4 seed and 3 seed predictions.  However, to bump us up to a #2 seed, I think we'd need to beat OSU and Mich St., and do it at least somewhat convincingly (or at least look good while winning those games).  Wins over Minnesota, Purdue and Indiana, for example, I don't think would bump us up to a #2.

Unfortunately, the Big Ten is at a disadvantage when it comes to tourney seeding because its so strong top to bottom (sans Nebraska and PSU).  It will be tough or almost impossible for any BT team to get a #1, and depending on how MSU and OSU do this weekend, they might not even get a #2.  Neither team has been exactly hot lately, although OSU played well last Sunday.

Its ok though, I think the BT will do very well in the tourney.  I think Purdue and Indiana, as well as MSU, OSU, and of course Mich will all have a good opportunity to make some noise (not that all of those teams will, but they all will be ready).  Playing tough teams in the BT week in and week out pays off this time of year.

"Some people break under pressure; others break records."

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.