NCAA source: unprecedented penalties against Penn State Monday

Submitted by Leaders And Best on
Not sure what this means, but if they are announcing it without a letter of inquiry, it probably means Penn State administration and AD is in agreement. I am guessing a fine or profits donated to charity with no TV ban or death penalty.
 

NCAA source tells CBS News athletic assn. will announce "unprecedented" penalties against Penn State, football team http://cbsn.ws/QnwOzy

NCAA @NCAA

NCAA to hold press conference on #PennState Mon at 9 a.m. ET. Live coverage from @InsidetheNCAA & web stream link avail tmrw.

UPDATE #1:

- Reports that PSU will not fight the penalties. Points to deal between PSU and NCAA.

Bruce Feldman @BFeldmanCBS

RT @djoneshoop PennSt will NOT appeal NCAA's decision, I've been told. Speed of decision/lack of contention pts to a deal betw NCAA & PSU

UPDATE #2:

- Yahoo Sports NCAA Angel of Death Charles Robinson reporting penalty of multiple bowls and crippling scholarship losses.

Charles Robinson @CharlesRobinson

Penn State penalty: multiple bowls, crippling scholarship losses & NCAA Prez is levying it w/ no in-house investigation http://tinyurl.com/btmywbn

UPDATE #3:

- CBS Sports reporting massive fine in penalty.

@McMurphyCBS: Penn State will be fined b/w $30 million to $60 million, sources told @CBSSports http://cbsprt.co/O8tNRq

ClearEyesFullHart

July 22nd, 2012 at 9:54 AM ^

If they really want to show the appropriate level of remorse(which frankly they haven't shown any of to this point) they would vacate their wins from the Paterno era and remove any evidence of their existence from PSU's campus. That would be a start.

oc michigan fan

July 22nd, 2012 at 9:59 AM ^

I caught the end of Lee "Hacksaw" Hamilton's conversation with someone Wednesday afternoon that hinted towards a possible ban on ALL Penn State athletics for 1 year. 

superstringer

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:49 AM ^

football did this to those kids. The almighty power of football. It seduced previously good men and turned them in an evil regime, made them protect their football brand over the evil they allowed to exist in their midst. The seduction of football greatness gave paternoster absolute power... And absolute power corrupts absolutely...

There is NO difference between how um and pus fans loved their team, their university, their community. The fact we have all cycled thru multiple F5 keys on this blog/board is proof, all of us have been seduced by football too.

So, we aren't better. We aren't different. we are all humans. Your reaction should be: THERE BUT FOR THE GRACE OF GOD, GOES I.

This is a sad sad sad day for all football fans. Not a time to gloat about our football success versus theirs.

Leaders And Best

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:15 AM ^

Greg Webb decommits, Ross Douglas visits Nebraska, and another commit was working out at FSU camp to try to get a scholarship all this past weekend.

They may have not been given specifics, but they may have been told something down the pipleine.

DGDestroys

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:11 AM ^

On one hand, it seems like the NCAA is over-stepping their bounds, and I agree with Brian on the whole redundancy of punishment thing.

On the other hand, I don't really care and think they deserve it.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:36 AM ^

I agree with this almost exactly.....with one slight change.

I don't think they should get the death penalty.  For one, I think that would turn them into a sympathetic figure in the eyes of many, and then you'd have "PSU nation" or whatever feeling like martyrs instead of feeling appropriately chastised.  And I don't think it's fair to the current players.

On the other hand, whatever size hammer the NCAA brings outside of that, I'm fine with.  If they want to stick with their usual deal, scholarships and bowl bans, only instead of five a year and one season, it's fifty a year and ten seasons, cool.

bdsisme

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:13 AM ^

 

Mark Emmert was granted authority to punish PSU in unprecedented manner by NCAA Board and Committee

 

 

Penn State facing loss of bowl/s and scholarships, but not so-called death penalty

 

 

Penn State sanctions expected to be extremely harsh and could even be perceived as more damaging long-term than "death penalty"

 

 

Thee sanctions were not self-imposed or negotiated. This is Emmert taking a stand he felt he had to due to horrors in Freeh Report.

 

 

julesh

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:13 AM ^

Joe Schad's Twitter has a lot to say about this: https://twitter.com/schadjoe/

"Penn State facing loss of bowl/s and scholarships, but not so-called death penalty"

"Penn State sanctions expected to be extremely harsh and could even be perceived as more damaging long-term than "death penalty""

"Thee sanctions were not self-imposed or negotiated. This is Emmert taking a stand he felt he had to due to horrors in Freeh Report."

Michigan Arrogance

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:15 AM ^

According to NCAA source via ESPN, it is NOT the death penalty. HOWEVER:

1) the penalties will be intrepreted as EXTREME

2) they may be perceived as worse than, or at least on par with, the death penalty

3) Pres Emerek of the NCAA was granted extended powers by the NCAA board of governors in order to do this.

winterblue75

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:15 AM ^

Penn State sanctions expected to be extremely harsh and could even be perceived as more damaging long-term than "death penalty"

 

Penn State facing loss of bowl/s and scholarships, but not so-called death penalty

 

So which is it? Loss of bowls and scholarships really doesn't seem to fit the bill of these crimes. Bowl bans and scholapship losses are like community service nowadays

Lofter4

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:22 AM ^

Not necessarily. If it's something like a 5 year bowl ban and a reduction of 50 scholarships over 5 years, I'd say that's pretty damn brutal. You'd basically be eliminating any decent recruit coming in for the next few years.

Combine that with a current player exodus, and you have a program that gets pounded week in and week out for the next decade.

LB

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:32 AM ^

It will take a decade to recover. The glory days of PSU will be a story to be told to children and grandchildren. Watching them get humbled week in and week out will do what horrifying news could not.

It also allows for future players to be "those who stood", and to create a new beginning, one that does not pay homage to criminals.

superstringer

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:57 AM ^

It punishes those of us in the conf who DONt have a crossover game with psu. Msu gets a freebie win and we don't, that sort of thing. Game shouldn't count in division standings.

But I'm glad I won't see us on the field this year with That Team. Change the uniforms at least....

CRex

July 22nd, 2012 at 11:06 AM ^

That's an excellent point.  If you just suspend football for a couple years, they'll be back.  Their donors will just flood them with case in year three when the program comes back and get PSU rebuilt as quickly as possible.  Long term punishment is excellent as it forces the culture at PSU to de emphasis football for years, no matter how much money the donors flood into the program.

My only fear is that in a couple years mass media has moved past this, the NCAA loses its spine, and lifts the last half of the punishment based on time served or something.  Otherwise I'm all for crippling PSU down to a level where Indiana can put up 70 on them for the next decade.  

 

BlueinLansing

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:41 AM ^

in the previous posts, but PSU received a letter of inquiry last November so this is not some sudden decision by the NCAA without the usual investigation.

 

Also this is harsh and would really F up the Big Ten schedule.

DrunkOnHiggins

July 22nd, 2012 at 10:49 AM ^

Tomorrow's sanctions will be a reminder to Penn State of how good they've had it the past 15 years. Is it fair to the new kids and staff? No, but there's nothing else you can do about it when this many years have passed.