Blue2000

April 8th, 2016 at 12:54 PM ^

Isn't this ambiguous as written?  "...or at facilities regularly used for practice or competition" distinguishes those facilities from the "school's facilities" in the first clause.  Though the intent is clear, so long as Harbaugh continued to hold his satellite campes at "facilities regularly used for practice or competition," he'd technically be in compliance with the language, regardless of which state he holds the camps in.  

robpollard

April 8th, 2016 at 1:00 PM ^

Unless there is some, otherwhere specified, definition of "regularly", you can just hold a practice in Prattville (or Florida) every year, and then a satellite camp. That would be "regular".


It would lessen the camps, but still allow you to have 1 or 2.

Also -- what's the penalty for breaking this rule? Having to listen to Delaney explain to you for 4-hours why adding Rutgers was a good idea, with no breaks?

bluebyyou

April 8th, 2016 at 2:16 PM ^

Are there any MGo-ANTITRUST lawyers that might want to weigh in on this issue?

It seems to me, and this was discussed last year by ND's AD, that this restriction by the NCAA is anti-competitive in that it restricts opportunities for high school athletes.  I wonder if there might be an opportunity to file a suit against the NCAA using antitrust as the basis of the complaint.

If there is merit to what I suggest, file the suit along with a motion for injunctive relief that orders the NCAA to suspend the rule until the case is adjudicated.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/jon-solomon/25166729/not...

The SEC and ACC want a national rule preventing college football coaches from staging satellite camps far off campus. Nick Saban is complaining that satellite camps are “ridiculous.” NCAA president Mark Emmert says the issue will be at the top of the list for the NCAA's Football Oversight Committee.

Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick offers some cautionary advice to the NCAA: Good luck defending yourself against another antitrust lawsuit.

“The NCAA does not have a very good track record of limiting, without losing an antitrust lawsuit, economic opportunities for coaches,” Swarbrick said Tuesday at the College Football Playoff meetings. “So they should be treading very lightly. The perception is these are school opportunities. A lot of these are coach opportunities purely. Imagine a rule that said, as was introduced years ago, coaches couldn't do national televised advertising because it created a recruiting advantage. … I wouldn't want to defend those lawsuits.”

 

Truthbtold

April 8th, 2016 at 3:09 PM ^

Going about the whole satellite camp process like a out of control, disrespectful asshole. Fact is nobody likes some other team coming into their area to hold camps. But when you are so abrasive and disrespectful as to set up camps at a freaking High School within miles of a major University common sense should tell you it's going a step to far. And now thanks to crazy Jim and his circus act nobody will be doing them. Let's face the facts, Harbaugh is a asshole in everything he does, nobody likes him, not in NFL, or NCAA. He has managed to make people put new rules in place just to contain his foolishness. At what point does he begin to act like a professional ? Let this be a lesson for Harbaugh. In the NCAA the coaches that have the power are the ones with the trophies, not the one who cries and screams the loudest. If Jim wants to go against the grain he is going to have to actually win something, till then he will remain a nobody

Rumsey

April 8th, 2016 at 1:15 PM ^

The Dreaded Re…

April 8th, 2016 at 1:19 PM ^

Who benefits from that little clause "...or at facilities regularly used for practice or competition,"?  Are there schools that regularly use other facilities to practice/play?  I guess SDSU uses Qualcomm instead of their own stadium, but this little rule was specifically proposed and passed to benefit the SEC. Do SEC schools regularly camp away from school facilities?

Perhaps Jim should just change it from "Camp" to something just a little different.  A team-building vacation! 

MI Expat NY

April 8th, 2016 at 1:30 PM ^

Maybe some schools in NFL cities use NFL facilities for practice reguarly or even just on occasion, for instance if they lack an indoor practice facility.   Schools like SMU, Tulane, Houston, Miami, Vanderbilt, Charlotte (going FBS soon, I believe), Temple, etc.  There could be a reason one of those schools would also want to hold or participate in a camp at the NFL facilities.

ajchien

April 8th, 2016 at 5:24 PM ^

Seems simple to me. Effective immediately, Jim Harbaugh and the entire Michigan football staff have resigned their positions at the University of Michigan, to pursue other personal interests. Warde Manuel has started the new coaching staff search.. The AD believes has a top candidate in mind already, he expects to made the decision soon, and will introduce the new staff after some football satellite camps finish. Seems to me that if you're no longer employed, you can travel where you want, talk as much as you want to athletes and parents and coaches. You're not the Michigan coach, and you're not recruiting for Michigan. But you might be taking a new job in a few weeks, and we'll talk more when that happens. :)

N. Campus Tech

April 8th, 2016 at 1:21 PM ^

And ACC. 

There is no reasoning beyond that. If there was, why would the NCAA limit this to only FBS football?

Baseball coaches are free to travel the USA, but if a FBS football coach tries it? Think of the children!

MI Expat NY

April 8th, 2016 at 1:32 PM ^

I doubt it was just the SEC/ACC.  I'm sure all southern non-P5 schools were opposed as they don't want anyone gaining access to their diamond in the roughs.  I wouldn't be shocked if the have nots of the Big Ten also opposed because they couldn't get the budget to do this and didn't want further disadvantages compared to the top schools.  

Wolverine Devotee

April 8th, 2016 at 12:51 PM ^

B1G, Pac12 and Big 12 should leave the NCAA.

Southern schools go crying to mama when others get legal advantages, while they themselves cheat. Is that right?

Let them play with themselves. See how successful a two-conference association will be.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Rabbit21

April 8th, 2016 at 1:01 PM ^

Yeah, this is simply protectionist bullshit that will get dressed up as, "We are looking out for schools that may not have the resources in order to fully implement this system."  

Amazing that the SEC can so easily force the NCAA to "Heel".

Sports

April 8th, 2016 at 12:52 PM ^

Rationale: "Oh no, someone is making this look too professional. Quick, let's shut down the ability for low income students to get exposure. That would solve the issue!" -cashes check for three million dolars-

George Pickett

April 8th, 2016 at 12:53 PM ^

We need to hit the reset button on the administration of college athletics.  Just start over.