NCAA approves 3 more bowl games, now 42 bowls

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on

65% of FBS teams will play in a bowl game. 

Just let every team go to a bowl at this point.

The worst two in the nation can play in the Pine Bowl in Orono, Maine or at Barrow Stadium in Barrow, Alaska-

 

 

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/12829390/ncaa-adds-bowl-games-raising-total-42-sites-include-tucson-austin-orlando

The NCAA approved three more bowl games.

One at Texas' DKR Memorial Stadium, Arizona Stadium in Tucson and the Citrus Bowl meaning there will be THREE bowl games at the Citrus Bowl.

 

FL Go Blue

May 5th, 2015 at 10:41 PM ^

For competitive purposes, it's ridiculous. For the kids, the opportunity for more practices is great and some of them may get the most national exposure of their careers. Adds more fuel to the fire of athletes generating revenue for their schools.

Danwillhor

May 6th, 2015 at 12:48 AM ^

it should be limited to a degree but allow the program to dictate how far they go. It could be a recruiting positive or negative based on what the kids want. All of these bowls are just ridiculous & the extra legal practice it allows is the better part for most bowl teams. I'm not old enough to remember the days of "win your conference or be a major program in the top 10 to get the rare at large bids or stay home" days but I do recall having to win an absolute minimum of 8 games to make a bowl as there weren't a ton of them. It was basically the same situation above but with the top 2-3 in each conference getting into one. Now? In a 12-13 game regular season you have to win 6. lol. Win 6 & don't be Louisiana Tech State A&M Tech at Lafayette. That's it. Do that & you'll get to the "Dr. Ramani LASIK Eye Surgery Bowl".

East German Judge

May 5th, 2015 at 10:59 PM ^

So how the heck is this better than expanding the NC playoffs from 4 teams to 8.  Very few people will watch these bowls vs. 4 more games with  top ranked teams battling it out. 

mGrowOld

May 5th, 2015 at 11:10 PM ^

Not sure that's a good comparison.  Expanding the playoffs to 8 teams means the two excellent teams in the NCG play three more games while expanding the number of bowls simply means 6 more almost crappy teams get to play one more game.

Personally i dont get why people would be bothered by this.  To me it's like being pissed because they add more stuff at the Chinese buffet.  So what if it's not that great; it's free and you can have as much as you want.  And if you don't want it -take something else- nobody's forcing you to eat (watch) all of it just cause it's there.

 

Tater

May 6th, 2015 at 4:07 AM ^

What an 8-team playoff would mean is that two teams would play two more games, two teams would play three more games and there would be four more berths open for teams to get into the bowls that already exist.  

For comparison: North Dakota State, who won the FCS Championship, went 15-1 during 2014-15.  I have a feeling that the kids playing for a National Championship won't mind the extra games in the least.  

west2

May 6th, 2015 at 12:06 PM ^

is the continued dilution of the post season bowl system.   To the point of team's with losing records or 6-6 records competing featuring mediocre players.   As stated by someone else, why not allow all team's to practice after the regular season removing that incentive and then limit the bowls to 20 allowing the top 40 teams in the FBS to compete giving some meaning to the regular season.   More is not always better.  

madmaxweb

May 5th, 2015 at 10:58 PM ^

I understand people aren't a big fan of all the bowl games but two things. 1. You don't have to watch all 42 games so why complain about it?? And 2. Football at the college level is fun to watch for many people so the more game the better. I for one, which is just my opinion, would much rather watch two 6-6 teams face off in a bowl game where many kids are playing the last game they will ever play than watching NFL games. Not to mention there are rarely games on Sunday anyways so you won't miss out on any NFL games and still be able to watch most of the college bowl games.

grumbler

May 6th, 2015 at 7:59 AM ^

The only reason to complain about the extra bowl games is if you care about the college football regular season.  Games are not very meaningful if the outcome is to determine who plays in the Old Spice Aftershave bowl or the Doctor Paul Smith Chiropractic Practice Bowl.  each bowl game cheapens all the rest by making them even less special, and cheapens the regular season by making games mean less. There is such a thing as too much of a thing. Forty-two bowl game is an example of too much.

bacon

May 5th, 2015 at 11:10 PM ^

Argh, I hate having more football games in December/January that I could watch. It takes away valuable time I could be spending with my in laws.

LSAClassOf2000

May 5th, 2015 at 11:14 PM ^

I know we like to say "It's Happening!" lately, especially now that a certain thing has in fact happened, but 42 bowl games? The One Hour Martinizing Bowl is happening.

FauxMichBro

May 5th, 2015 at 11:27 PM ^

yeah. once there is a 6 game playoff, from a fans perspective, any other bowl would be meaningless, so that's where the new bar is set. before it was special just to make a bowl, but now it's only special to make the playoff so who cares how many extra bowls there are.

BlueinOK

May 5th, 2015 at 11:43 PM ^

I love this. The more college football the better. I'd watch some 7-5 MAC team play a 6-6 Sun Belt team right now if it was on TV. I love baseball and basketball, but damn college football is great!



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Yo_Blue

May 6th, 2015 at 7:57 AM ^

Central was 10-0-1 actually. They tied Toledo 7-7 in the Glass Bowl.

There were only 15 bowl games then and the MAC had no tie in with the bowls.  Michigan lost to North Carolina in the Gator Bowl that year when John Wangler suffered a horrific knee injury. tOSU lost to USC in the Rose while Purdue and Indiana (yes, that Indiana) won their bowl games over Tennessee and BYU respectively.

CoachBP6

May 6th, 2015 at 12:00 AM ^

Pretty soon the NCAA will start handing out bowl bids for going 4-8. What's next, every team receiving a participation medal?

Kermits Blue Key

May 6th, 2015 at 9:05 AM ^

Regardless of political affiliation, this is such a dumb and empty statement. You are the perfect example of why we can't speak about politics and such on this board - inflammatory trolling of people/things you don't agree with absolutely no factual basis for your remarks.

WolverineHistorian

May 6th, 2015 at 12:38 AM ^

It's been over a decade now since they started allowing 6-6 teams to go to bowl games and I still think its a dumb idea. But I'm not losing any sleep over it. I don't really watch any bowl games anymore until we get to a day or two before New Years...unless a B1G team is playing.

UMxWolverines

May 6th, 2015 at 1:40 AM ^

Oh joy...3 more bowl games that will have 5,000 people in the stands for each one. That will cost each school thousands of dollars but will make the head of the bowl thousands of dollars in TV money.

OccaM

May 6th, 2015 at 2:14 AM ^

So... no one else gonna mention how there's a polar bear chilling in one of the pictures? 

 

There will be more polar bears than people watching that game 

Hair Raid Offense

May 6th, 2015 at 4:57 AM ^

People may rip on the new bowl games, but there is no better feeling than gettting out of work early on a random Tuesday in Mid-December and being able to watch a LIVE football game.

The CMU game last year at the Bahamas Bowl sticks out. So does the Memphis-BYU game,  two teams I knew little about and cared less about, but ended up being an amazingly entertaining game.

HELLE

May 6th, 2015 at 8:50 AM ^

It's a chance for fan to take a vacation and watch there team, a boost for the local economy and an experience for the players. I had a great time at the Outback Bowl a few years ago. I don't see the problem with it. These games were originally went to be exhibitions anyway.