Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 18 hours ago
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 21 hours ago
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 days ago
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 5 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Yet Another Da'Shawn Hand post
    canzior - 2,949 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,456 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,062 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 1,045 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 1,003 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 32 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 19 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 13 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 6-18-13
    Ace - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    17 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    18 replies
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    52 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    109 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    28 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    25 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    12 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    60 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    28 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    5 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    23 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  • VOTE-B1G Preseaon Offensive POY (Devin)
    24 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    12 replies
  • One of the top DE in 2015 commits to GameCocks and trashes their academics!
    37 replies
  • (Mostly) OT: Michelle Chamuel of UM can win The Voice tonight (with votes)
    37 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    5 replies
  • OT - Pavel Datsyuk signs 3-yr extension with Red Wings
    43 replies
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  • The Full NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke
    10 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • VOTE-B1G Preseaon Offensive POY (Devin)
    24 replies
  • Michigan fits Steele's "National Championship Mold"
    38 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • B. Miller ripped - Ohio PR Machine
    52 replies
  • ESPN Names Webber Top Draft Pick from B10 Since '89
    30 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • Pretty OT: Golf Wedge Customization
    21 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 8
  • ››
  • OT'ish: Michigan or Harvard?
    176 replies
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    142 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    109 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • OT: Tigers/afternoon baseball Open Thread
    97 replies
  • John U. Bacon on the GA Student Section
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Miami fans leave Game 6 early, miss incredible ending

    like I said on twitter: that was almost as intense as Iowa NIT games

    0 comments
  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  • San Antonio Spurs may be doing something right by drafting international athletes

    strong indictment of AAU right heah

    0 comments
  • NBA draft 2013 Toss Up: Better PG prospect, Trey Burke or Michael Carter-Williams

    Glockner sides with justice

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-coached fantasy camp raises $140K for prostate cancer research

    a good cause, and a good time

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

My 2010 UM Prediction UPDATED

168 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:19 PM
#1
RationalMSUfan
RationalMSUfan's picture
Joined: 04/15/2010
MGoPoints: 304
My 2010 UM Prediction UPDATED

Ok. I don't think I will make many friends with the post, but it's a boring time of year and at least it could be fun.

I should start out by saying that my first prediction is that Rich Rod will be fired after this year and Captain Comeback Jim Harbaugh will come in on a white horse and attempt to lead the largest comeback of his career.  The underlying rationale for my season prediction is your defense. I expect that regardless of the QB, UM will score some points and have an above average offense in the Big Ten. However, I am not buying that a defense that has been flat out awful in RRod's first two years will somehow get betting losing Brandon Graham and D. Warren.  I am not buying the Will Campbell Kool-Aid.  I think Mike Martin is your only "proven" plus player on defense.  I think and Craig Roh are proven "serviceable" Big Ten players. I don't mean servicable in a bad way, I mean in it a "you can count on them way".  I see Floyd, Ezeh, as Kovacs "minus" players and the rest as ?????.

This is not meant to be a flame either, just a sobering perspective from an outsider not looking at things thru maize and blue glasses.  If I turn out to be wrong, I will come back and face the music.

Without further ado,

Uconn - Loss - (0-1) I'm sure when this game was put on the schedule, it was supposed to be a nice appetizer for a traditionally powerful UM as a tuneup for the Notre Dame game.  Instead, this game is a legitimate toss up. I don't know the early line, but I suspect it will be within a FG either way.  UConn returns a ton of starters from a team that beat USC (not that USC) in their bowl game last year.  UConn is not flashy, but they have a solid team and a solid coach.  I expect talk radio to be going crazy following this one.

@ Notre Dame - Loss - (0-2) I know Michigan won this game last year, but I thought Notre Dame actually was the better team that day (I realize I may be in the minority with that opinion).  I also think that Brian Kelly is a damn fine coach.  Notre Dame will be breaking in a new QB, but they still have Michael Floyd and Kyle Rudolph to ease the transition. Had anyone heard of Tony Pike before Brian Kelly?  Kelly also won the Big East with 3 different starting QB's three years ago.  He will have his offense ready and the game is in South Bend. I expect a similar shootout, will the home team pulling it out again.

Umass - Win -(1-2).

Bowling Green - Win - (2-2). 

@ Indiana - Win - (3-2, 1-0) So, the rabid dogs are still rabid, but have been pacified by blowout wins over inferior opponents.  Now hope is renewed with the Big Ten opener. I DO NOT think this game will be easy, as UM cannot just rubber stamp any big ten road game having lost @ Illinois last year.  Also, Indiana put up a fight in the Big House last year.  With that said, I expect Michigan to have too much offense for Indy to hang with and Michigan to pull away late and win by 7-14 points.

MSU - Loss - (3-3, 1-1) Like the Angel of the Big House, I too believe that this will be the biggest game of the Rich Rod era to date.  Under my scenerio, the natives will be restless having lost to Uconn and Notre Dame.  However, a win against MSU and Rich Rod would be 2-0 in the Big Ten and the momentum meter would be pointing in the right direction.  Alternatively, a 3rd straight loss to f'ing MSU and Rich Rod may be facing an in-season dismissal. I know some do not consider MSU a rival, but I think that position is ridiculous. I understand and acknowledge that we may not be your 1st or 2nd rival, but I just don't believe any UM fan that claims he/she would not be stinging from a 3rd straight loss to MSU more so than say Illinois, Wiscy, Iowa or Minny.

Back to the game.....I think we are a better football team than UM.  Sorry for that opinion.  I'm sure UM fans look at last year's game and say we needed OT to win at home.  I tend to look at the first 3.5 quarters of the game and see total domination.  I'm not saying my opinion is correct, but I guess we will find out in October.  I think our offense, while not the spread, will be dynamic this year. We have multiply playmakers at WR, a strong stable of TE's and I'm expecting an improvement from our true freshman RB's.  OL is the only concern on offense.  I acknowlege it is a large concern.  Any any event, I predict an MSU win and this loss will probably be the one that signifies the end of the Rich Rod era

Iowa - Loss (3-4, 1-2) - Iowa is a team that seems to play better on the road.  Their defense will be nasty and I think Clayborn is one of the top 2 defensive players in the Big Ten. For the record, I don't think Greg Jones is No. 1. That award goes to Clayborn/Heyward IMO.  Anyways, I think Iowa is good. They don't seem to blow anybody out, but I think they will win.

@ PSU - Loss - (3-5, 1-3) - I always take the position that good defense beats good offense.  I think PSU will struggle to break in a new QB, but playing at Happy Valley,  I think Newsome (or whoever wins the job) just needs to be ok to win.  PSU dismantled UM last year (us too) and this year the game is at home.

Illinois - Win - (4-5, 2-3) - I think this is the year you slay the Illinois dragon. I think they will absolutely blow this year. No Benn, Zook can't coach, game in Ann Arbor.  UM gets an easy win here.

@ Purdue - Loss - (4-6, 2-4) - I know I am not making any friends and I do think Danny Hope is a prick, but playing @ Purdue was never easy even for the good Michigan teams. I see 3 straight losses to Purdue in Rich Rod's future. Another reason for his dismissal.

Wiscy - Win - (5-6, 3-4) - Playing to save Rich's job, I think you guys pull this one out.  But too little too late.

@ OSU - Win - (5-7, 3-5) - Beat OSU maybe keep your job is the rallying cry for this one, but it aint happening. OSU's defense is great and Pryor is getting better.  This day will sting, but at least it will bring an end to the RRod era and healing/re-birth can begin.

 

[mod edit: he would like to add the following. he made it a separate post but no need]

 

Gents,

I see I ruffled some feathers.  Not my intent.  I do find it funny that predicting 5-7 is somehow crazy and automatic troll.

For the record, I had a typo.  Martin was my plus player. RVB and Roh were my solid players.

Also, just because a guy is a starter does not make them a "plus" player IMO.

We've had plenty of 2-3 year starters that were not plus players.

 

I've read enough about Ezeh to conclude he is not a plus player, no matter how  many years he started.

 

Also, seasons RARELY go by the chalk.  So yes, losing to purdue but beating Wiscy dosn't make sense on paper, but isn't that what happened in 2008?

 

Like I said, I will be back when the dust settles.  If you guys go 8-4, I'll come back and say I was wrong.  So nobody on this board thinks 5-7 is possible? Wow.

 

Take care,

Still RationalMSUfan

Go Green!!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • football

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:24 PM | So much for being rational (Score:1)
maizenbluenation
maizenbluenation's picture
Joined: 08/20/2009
MGoPoints: 315

So much for being rational

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:28 PM | Dammit (Score:1)
WichitanWolverine
WichitanWolverine's picture
Joined: 09/30/2009
MGoPoints: 20

You took the words right out of my mouth.  I think he needs to change his name to DrunkAndIrrational(Typical)MSUfan.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 4:14 PM | Yeah (Score:1)
tatemcnabb5
Joined: 09/29/2009
MGoPoints: 307

You could just make that "MSU fan".  The rest of it makes it redundant

Hail to the victors!

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 5:05 PM | In fairness (Score:1)
MadMonkey
MadMonkey's picture
Joined: 04/08/2010
MGoPoints: 1723
my little brother  often says some stupid shit, too.

Your opinion has no value.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 9:02 PM | Damn only getting to +1 you (Score:1)
GBLforlife
Joined: 11/02/2009
MGoPoints: 123

Damn only getting to +1 you

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 6:06 PM | Classic case of premature (Score:1)
MGrad
MGrad's picture
Joined: 08/13/2009
MGoPoints: 254

Classic case of premature etrollication by this State fan.

Rational MSU Fan

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 4:24 PM | At least (Score:1)
evenyoubrutus
evenyoubrutus's picture
Joined: 11/04/2008
MGoPoints: 4828

after this thread, he'll never be able to start one again.

Not that I loved Rich Rod less, but that I loved Michigan more.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:24 PM | see this is what i'm talking about (Score:1)
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 20391

so many people "loved" a rational opposing fan that now he has to make a new thread every time he comes on here to "rationally" explain how UM will make zero progress and lose to 7 teams next year. of course MSU will go 9-3 according to this poster.

to the OP - you obviously pride yourself on being reasonable and come on here to 'try to discuss the issues' but not every offering has to be a new post. Irish doesn't do it. various Buckeyes don't. you don't either. try being a 'member' of the board instead of trying to imply some statesmanship and a constant demand for attention by making a new post every time. shit wouldn't fly if an mgoblog member did it on RCMB - why are you doing it here?

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:25 PM | OSU (Score:1)
Elno Lewis
Elno Lewis's picture
Joined: 12/05/2008
MGoPoints: 1143

is gonna rip the panties out of our crotch and make us eat them.

We needz another year fore we can beat they butts

 

Time wounds all heels. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwGXMryTbwE

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:26 PM | his expert analysis (Score:1)
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 20391

listed it as a win while marking it as a loss

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:37 PM | Sounds like a future Freep (Score:1)
trueblue262
trueblue262's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 2030

Sounds like a future Freep writer to me!

GRwolverine73

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:28 PM | There is little rational in (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 18038

There is little rational in this post, sorry.

EDIT:  Also - does this mean that RVB, Woolfolk, and Mouton are ??? players?  Even though they're returning starters in their 4th (or 5th) season in the program?  You know enough about our program to sound rational, but you don't know enough to give a true analysis.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:40 PM | I think the ????'s mean "unknown", or "can't see" (Score:1)
trueblue262
trueblue262's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 2030

Ofcourse theres a good chance he has a ski mask on that is limiting his sight!

GRwolverine73

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 7:31 PM | Ski mask (Score:1)
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6051

He's wearing it backwards.

"If life is the road, then Ohio is simply a place to stop for gas." -- Scott Burgess, Detroit News, 9/16/2010
  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 5:24 PM | I find it funny (Score:1)
bnewsom3
bnewsom3's picture
Joined: 02/17/2009
MGoPoints: 690

that many of our returning starters are "minus" or ??? players but he fully expects their freshmen running backs to be producers.  So much for following the same line of logic.  He has stated that he doesn't bye into the Big Will(or freshmen) hype because he hasn't seem them on the field yet it is different with MSU's incoming players.  Plus, who are all the great "playe makers" at the WR position?

When you reach the end of your rope tie a knot and hold on...

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 5:32 PM | ummm (Score:1)
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 20391

he's referring to what will be MSU's sophomore running backs, those being true freshman starters Caper and Baker

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 6:47 PM | I agree, and the fact that 2 (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 18038

I agree, and the fact that 2 of his 3 minus players (and maybe all three) might not even be starters this fall.  Even though one of his minus players made the freshman all-Big Ten last year as well as second team freshman all-american.   And we have 3 returning starters that are ???.  I understand giving a guy who hasn't had a lot of PT the ??? treatment, but 3 returning starters?

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:28 PM | I used to believe you (Score:1)
Jensencoach
Jensencoach's picture
Joined: 12/12/2009
MGoPoints: -188

but any chance of you being rational left when you decided that ND's quarterback situation would be anything but turbulent by week 2.  It looks like you worked hard on this but you lost me after your ND analysis.

 

EDIT: First poster beat me to it

"If they ever catch me, they can have 'em." -Denard Robinson

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:28 PM | Didn't read it (Score:1)
Carcajous
Carcajous's picture
Joined: 07/05/2009
MGoPoints: 1577

But let me guess...

 

You have us losing to MSU, right?  

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:29 PM | UConn...... (Score:1)
Bosch
Bosch's picture
Joined: 04/03/2009
MGoPoints: 4299

was added to the schedule last year. 

To me, this oversite overshadows any rationale you tried to bring to your opinion since you used it as a knock on the Michigan AD and their scheduling.

All right Lemmings. Bring the heat.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:32 PM | We're so good we go 15-0 (Score:1)
Twisted Martini
Twisted Martini's picture
Joined: 08/30/2009
MGoPoints: 1191

Whip that Buckeye ass twice on the same day.  Show up early for the Indiana game and beat them Friday night.  And beat Central after Sparty loses to them (again.)

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:32 PM | shocking...you have us losing to msu (Score:1)
tdumich
Joined: 11/07/2009
MGoPoints: 0

i trust your prediction for anything UM related as much as i'd trust an msu student to do my chemistry homework.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:34 PM | The evidence: 1) We are (Score:1)
blueblueblue
Joined: 12/29/2008
MGoPoints: 2257

The evidence:

1) We are tired of posts predicting UM's w/l record by our own fanbase or even by the "experts"

2) We do not like folks from other teams making agenda-laden posts, i.e., trolls (e.g., Irish walks the non-troll line well)

3) You, from another team, made an agenda-laden post predicting next-season's w/l record

 

Conclusion: You are currently a troll. Go away for a while. Come back later. Post better. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:34 PM | ugh (Score:1)
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 20391
We have multiply playmakers at WR, a strong stable of TE's and I'm expecting an improvement from our true freshman RB's.  OL is the only concern on offense.  I acknowlege it is a large concern.

Uhhhh. What multiple playmakers are at WR? Playmakers implies dynamic game changers. Dantonio had to move a QB to the WR position in order to flesh out the roster. The amount of looks Nichols get reflects the LIMIT at the position, not the depth. Further, having a "Stable" of TEs is worthless unless you put 5 out at a time. You took a WR and made him a FULLBACK. And the only concern on offense is OL? You know, the thing that allowed and assisted your Freshman RBs to play as well as they did? The OL is EVERYTHING. It's why UM was even worse than their qbs played in 08 and why, in 09, UM was better. It's also why in '10 UM will be even better.

Tell me, what dynamic elements of UConn's defense implies that they will be able to slow UM down? What's more, with their decimated offensive line and a lack of true returning RB the likes of an heir apparent, why, aside from the loss of Graham, would the UM defense not be able to more properly contain the Husky offense? Or is your analysis solely based on the "LOL UM LOL" meme that finds UConn considerable? Remember who else was supposed to beat UM last year? WMU.

You've built up a board presence by toeing a line and not falling into Spartan Tailgate-level "we're better, suck it"ness. But this post just shows all you're in it for is the attention. Try posting in general topic threads about the Big Ten. There's about 9000. That doesn't interest you, though, because it's not about you. Also a Loss @Purdue but a win at home against Wisconsin is a joke.

There's absolutely zero 'expert' analysis on here. The fact I understand the complexities of these games and Big Ten rosters better than you shows two things: (1) I would never dream of trying to describe my 'prediction' in the vein that it would come off as me thinking I'm an expert and (2) you never should have.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:42 PM | Is it possible (Score:1)
Six Zero
Six Zero's picture
Joined: 09/05/2008
MGoPoints: 10176

that Geaux Blue is more knowledgeable about Spartan personnel than Mr. Rational himself?  Or should we cut him some slack, since he's been so busy over here professing his expertise on all things maize and blue?

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:49 PM | sadly (Score:1)
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 20391

it's always a losing battle. I married a Spartan and she's learned that she can know absolutely NOTHING about MSU and still get under my skin by bringing up if they win/beat UM, etc. and when I try to point out a UM loss she's able to fully embrace the "i don't care anyways." eventually I'm left screaming "LLOYD CARR IS A BRILLIANT MAN!"

sadly i would also assert i probably do know more about MSU's roster than this guy. not UFR-level... but definitely enough.

FYI that dane cook sketch is my home to a t.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 4:10 PM | Married a Spartan (Score:1)
Bromigo
Bromigo's picture
Joined: 02/22/2010
MGoPoints: 902

I like being in a relationship where I win every disagreement too.

Well done sir. +1

We are here because we're not all there.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 4:21 PM | well i must be doing it wrong (Score:1)
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 20391

bc i haven't exactly been winning fights

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 4:08 PM | Yeah I agree.  How is MSU's (Score:1)
timhoops
timhoops's picture
Joined: 12/06/2009
MGoPoints: 240

Yeah I agree.  How is MSU's offense going to be so great?  The running game is going to take a step back with an inexperienced OL, and the passing game lost Blair White.  I think by playmakers he means punch throwers in term of how to describe the WRs.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 7:05 PM | I think it was another typo, (Score:1)
60blue
60blue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 304

I think it was another typo, he meant haymakers

Sarcasm is my drinking buddy

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 4:13 PM | Also a Loss @Purduebut a win (Score:1)
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5227

Also a Loss @Purduebut a win at home against Wisconsin is a joke.

That's where it went from the worst-case scenario to just no.

 

Maize n Brew

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 5:31 PM | Maybe he was refering to the (Score:1)
mmc22
mmc22's picture
Joined: 11/18/2009
MGoPoints: 315

Maybe he was refering to the WR's from the MSU version of "The Longest Yard" .

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:34 PM | What... (Score:1)
Kilgore Trout
Kilgore Trout's picture
Joined: 02/20/2009
MGoPoints: 1863

was irrational about it?  Pessimistic?  Certainly.  Totally out of the realm of possibility?  No way. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:38 PM | irrational (Score:1)
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 20391

was a mockery of his "rational MSU fan" monicker.

you are correct. it may be rational. but it's dumb.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 5:36 PM | is it dumber than me saying (Score:1)
TrppWlbrnID
TrppWlbrnID's picture
Joined: 10/29/2009
MGoPoints: 7973

is it dumber than me saying that i hope our two linebackers who were not very good last year will be better after learning a new system and having more youth and inexperience in back and in front of them?

i really hope they will be better, but to admit a scenario where they are not based on what we have seen so far is not dumb.

2013 resolution - make it onto the 2014 favorite MGoPosters post, not ironically
  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 5:40 PM | well (Score:1)
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 20391

considering his analysis is entirely based upon MSU developing in full while UM staying stagnant in some ways and becoming worse in others (DEFENSE IS DEAD GRAHAM IS GONE GERG DIED FOR OUR SINS), he has a slanted view. your view is one that breeds optimism that also accepts equivalent development in other teams. your view would reflect on the MSU situation and say that the running game at MSU might develop with the RBs being a year stronger, etc. however it would also include their O-Line being cut in half - an O-Line, mind you, that wasn't very sound last year to begin with.

 

see the problem with the above analysis is that it cherry picks where it sees development. development or continued success thrives in teams like PSU, MSU, UConn, etc. UM only suffers regression and TEH APOCALYPSE.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 6:32 PM | he makes a common error (Score:1)
snowcrash
Joined: 07/22/2008
MGoPoints: 1586

Any MSU player improving or UM player stagnating is individually plausible, but it's much less likely that collectively their guys will progress and ours won't. I think he also makes the mistake of reading too much into last year's UM-MSU game, which was our worst offensive performance of the year. It reminds me of the Iowa fans who dismissed UM going into the 2003 season, after we had laid an egg against them in 2002.

I look at MSU this year and I basically see us, but with more questions on the OL. Good returning QBs (theirs were a bit better last year, but ours are on the steeper part of the learning curve), good receivers, so-so RBs, decent run defense, bad pass defense. I think our run defense will be much improved even though Graham is gone: Campbell should be a fine space-eater, Roh won't be too small to play his position, Martin and Van Bergen should be stronger and won't be playing out of position, Ezeh and Mouton should be better under Robinson's coaching.

A few other nits to pick: UConn is a somewhat favorable matchup for us since they are a running team, and I wouldn't bet on ND's new QB being able to exploit our weak pass defense behind a mostly new OL in only their second game in a new offensive system.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:35 PM | Wow.  Do yourself a favor and (Score:1)
MGrad
MGrad's picture
Joined: 08/13/2009
MGoPoints: 254

Wow.  Do yourself a favor and stop thinking so much about the Michigan football program.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:35 PM | I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt (Score:1)
Six Zero
Six Zero's picture
Joined: 09/05/2008
MGoPoints: 10176

right up until you said Craig Roh was a "serviceable" Big Ten player.  Serviceable Big Ten players are like Brandon Englemon or DeWayne Patmon.

Hope you like your crow with extra eyebrows...

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 4:46 PM | Check the UFRs from last (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6423

Check the UFRs from last year. He'll probably improve a lot this coming year, but for last year "serviceable" is just the right word.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 5:36 PM | Craig Roh (Score:1)
mmc22
mmc22's picture
Joined: 11/18/2009
MGoPoints: 315

He was just a freshman last year and I believe he held his own pretty well.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 5:51 PM | Right. I got that. (Score:1)
Six Zero
Six Zero's picture
Joined: 09/05/2008
MGoPoints: 10176

Keep up with me.  This year we'll see more.  Like #88s hanging in the windows at MDen more.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 4th, 2010 at 8:40 AM | Look you said he had you (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6423

Look you said he had you until he said Roh "was" a serviceable player. Forgive me for inferring that your use of the past tense referred to something in the past, not future.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 11:03 PM | yes (Score:1)
cps2010
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 3750

I especially like how the  "serviceable" true frosh. (and not even an early enrollee) ran with one of their "stud" TEs and got a PBU in the end zone.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:35 PM | I knew I was right about (Score:1)
gremlin
gremlin's picture
Joined: 01/13/2009
MGoPoints: 602

I knew I was right about "rationalMSUfan".  Garbage. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:36 PM | Damn, I was just thinking (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11375

Damn, I was just thinking about posting a "Why we will go undefeated in 2010" thread in true off-season fashion. I guess that wouldn't be rational in light of this thread. I suppose I'll just have to wait until next week.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:36 PM | Is it rational to expect (Score:1)
markusr2007
markusr2007's picture
Joined: 10/21/2008
MGoPoints: 3448

Michigan to continue it's unheard of generosity in the turnover and penalties department against MSU for a third straight year? 

Alas the chances that MSU faces a true freshman Michigan signal-caller for a third straight season is pretty much zero. 

I would agree though that the first two contests on Michigan's schedule will probably have the Wolverines better prepared than anyone else in the league.   

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:39 PM | Long and overused topic is (Score:1)
MGoKereton
MGoKereton's picture
Joined: 01/21/2010
MGoPoints: 1040

Long and overused topic is long and overused.

In all seriousness, though.  I expect us to be better down the stretch as we're not playing a ridiculous number of freshmen who aren't used to a collegiate level of football.  I wouldn't go too far as declaring an OSU win at OSU, but stranger things have happened.  I expect this team to give us an incredible sense of hope we rally behind (see:  4-0 start last year), falter a little bit in the middle (maybe a 3-loss streak, including a game we should have won, which will cause massive panic in the MGoCommunity), but have a resurgent end to the season.  8-4 with a bowl victory is a successful year in my books.  

Is it September yet?

Lived the Dream. 2008-2012

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 4:58 PM | Baby Steps (Score:1)
U of M in TX
U of M in TX's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 429

First it's spring practice, then NCAA Football '11 in July, then fall practice, then we can start wishing for September.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 3rd, 2010 at 3:41 PM | I told you so.  This guy is (Score:1)
cbuswolverine
Joined: 08/14/2008
MGoPoints: 1778

I told you so.  This guy is no more rational than the rest of them.  I called it after this guy's second thread and a bunch of you got your panties in a bunch.

Sparty gonna Sparty.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.