MVictors Uncovers a Winged Helmet Paint Change

Submitted by MGoShoe on

Greg Dooley recently visited Capitol Varsity Sports in Oxford, OH to learn more about the process for reconditioning Michigan's famed winged helmets. His MVictors.com post on the visit is well worth your time. 

Greg followed up that post with one today that reveals that Michigan began including gold flakes into the maize paint in 2012 and this year's helmets continue the practice. 

Before checking with #1000SSS, I asked around and couldn’t find anyone aware of the change or a release talking about the flakes.*   I checked out some close-ups of photos and didn’t really notice anything.  Sap found one U-M collector, Dan Oles, who got his hands on a 2012 helmet that indeed had the flakes.  Oles wrote to Sap, “I contacted a few players via twitter asking if the regular season helmets had maize glitter paint. They all confirmed that they did.”  Oles even shot a note to Jon Falk who confirmed the change.

Fast forward to today.  I verified with media relations & with Falk that indeed the team had the bedazzled headgear in 2012.  The change to the paint was announced as part of the Cowboy Classic uniform reveal…but the news release didn’t call out the gold flakes:

"Michigan will be utilizing a new paint technology on the maize wings on the helmet in order to better highlight the most recognizable helmet in college football and create a more durable surface."

Those highlights included the shiny flecks.  (My understanding is it’s not real gold a la Notre Dame).  I also confirmed they’ve got the same look on the helmets this year as well.

Here's a close up of a 2013 helmet that Greg took at yesterday's practice.

What's your verdict?

or

reshp1

August 9th, 2013 at 3:15 PM ^

The glitter debate aside, the article is pretty interesting. I had no idea each helmet is taped and painted by hand. Nice to see there's some true craftsmen out there that haven't been replaced by machines yet.

Leonhall

August 9th, 2013 at 3:43 PM ^

To previous season where by the 2nd quarter it looked like the helmet had been through a war? Think it was 2 years ago....the paint came off easily.

samsoccer7

August 9th, 2013 at 3:52 PM ^

This probably makes the helmets look shinier under the lights. Since we have a night game, and more games that start at 330 than in the past, we play more games and more parts of games when the sun is down. If the helmet shines more under the lights, fine by me.

The FannMan

August 9th, 2013 at 4:06 PM ^

The messed with the helmet so my instinct is to grab ye ol' torch and pitchfork and storm the castle,  However, I put the pitchfork back in the barn and extinguished the torch when I realized that the change was not really visible.  

strick23

August 9th, 2013 at 4:37 PM ^

The State Street M-Den had one in their display case at the register last year!  Not sure if it's still there or not, but it did look good.

Avant's Hands

August 9th, 2013 at 6:13 PM ^

I don't mind it. The flecks aren't noticeable and, like others, I assume it makes the maize stand out more under the lights. What I don't understand are the people angry about this when they haven't noticed it. This is a non-issue.

M-jed

August 10th, 2013 at 12:27 AM ^

It's been mentioned already but that's my guess as well. My basketball shoes have a similar "paint job" where the glitter isn't noticeable unless up close but stands out with a camera flash. Same concept. And no, they're not glittery bedazzled WNBA shoes.

BlueDragon

August 10th, 2013 at 3:43 PM ^

I'll compare the look of the helmets at UTL II to, say, Braylonfest 2004 after the sun went down before I pass judgment. I hope this is not the first step down the slippery slope of helmet changes!