Money seems to be on UM in Wisc game.

Submitted by Ziff72 on

I thought it was interesting that the line has moved from Wisc -5.5 to Wisc -4 in the last day.   For those of you who are not gamblers that is a pretty big swing during the middle of the week.  This is especially surprising given the news attention being on Wisc scoring 83 points last week. 

Anybody have any theories on why this could have moved so much?  My only thought was the news of J. Clay maybe not being ready to play. 

Jamie?

jamiemac

November 17th, 2010 at 1:23 PM ^

I dont know how true this is

This is what everybody said in the lead up to the Illinois game, but every book I saw had way, way, way uneven action on the Illini

I have one season experience working as a book in the heart of Big 10 country and we wanted MIchigan to cover almost every week because people always bet against them. I named my blog Just Cover because my boss kept pleading it seemed every week, come the fuck on MIchigan just cover for once.

Beavis

November 17th, 2010 at 1:23 PM ^

Reasons why the line could be shifting (other than the obvious):

1) Wiscy's 83 point death march on Indiana was shocking.  Shocking enough to create a higher spread that is falling as the shock value wears off.

2) Whales are doing their analysis and noting that Wiscy hasn't won in Ann Arbor since some of the people on this board were born. 

3) Whales doing analysis that shows "Michigan offense = better at home" and "Michigan defense = improved since making adjustments pre-Illini game". 

Since there has not been major public news to cause this (e.g., "Another Wiscy RB out for Michigan" or "Tolzien out for game"), I have to think it's because of several larger bets being placed on Michigan. 

Just my 2 cents.  I have no insider info. 

Don

November 17th, 2010 at 1:46 PM ^

I'd expect the line to go back up.

That factoid about Wisky's November road record is interesting, but I still wouldn't put any money on Michigan. We will turn the ball over multiple times, and unless Wisconsin obliges us in similar fashion, I can't see us staying with them into the fourth quarter.

Braylon 5 Hour…

November 17th, 2010 at 2:10 PM ^

Last year we won the turnover margin by 1 and we even scored a defensive touchdown and we still lost by 21...

Granted we were on the road and our offense is significantly better now, but can we really keep them much under the 45 they put on us last year?

Note for the people who don't seem to care about John Clay playing or not playing, last year Clay put up 151 yards on us on 26 carries (5.8 ypc), while Monte Ball had 16 carries 62 yards (3.9 ypc)...I wouldn't mind seeing Clay on the sidelines again.

natesezgoblue

November 17th, 2010 at 4:22 PM ^

theres a good article on espn, talking about how wisconsin hast won at michigan since 1994 and hasnt won in the state of Michigan since 2002.

 

 

 

V

"It was one of those games where everything seemed to be going our way in the first half," said Wisconsin senior quarterback Scott Tolzien, then a sophomore reserve. "And in the second half, it was the exact opposite. The lesson you take from that is you can't ever ease up. 

"You always have to have your foot on the gas pedal." 

After running over Indiana to the tune of 83 points last Saturday, the Badgers hit the road this week to face Michigan. The stakes couldn't be higher for No. 7 Wisconsin, which finds itself in a three-way tie atop the Big Ten standings with No. 9 Ohio State and No. 12 Michigan State. 


[+] EnlargeWisconsin vs. Michigan
Gregory Shamus/Getty ImagesWisconsin's last trip to Michigan Stadium ended in a heartbreaking 27-25 loss.
Given the likelihood that at least one of the three teams wins its final two games, a loss likely eliminates a squad from the race. 

Unfortunately for Wisconsin, losses have been the norm at Stadium and Main. 

Wisconsin hasn't won at Michigan Stadium since 1994, a span of five games. The Badgers' only losses during the 1998 and 2006 seasons took place at the Big House. Their troubles actually extend beyond Ann Arbor. Wisconsin hasn't won a game in the state of Michigan since 2002, when it recorded a 42-24 victory at Spartan Stadium in East Lansing. 

Two years ago, Wisconsin came to Michigan at 3-0 and ranked No. 9 nationally. The Badgers built a 19-0 halftime lead before a Michigan squad that would go on to win only three games mounted the biggest comeback in stadium history to prevail 27-25. Wisconsin never truly recovered from its Big House collapse, finishing 7-6 that season. 

"It got away from us," Tolzien said. 

Many Wisconsin players have said the same thing after leaving Michigan Stadium. 

"It's been a struggle for a lot of people," Bielema said. "I was talking with [former Wisconsin coach Barry Alvarez] about his time here and the amount of victories he got up there. I know the only time that we beat Michigan at Michigan when I was a player at Iowa was the only year we went to the Rose Bowl. 

"So if you do it, is usually means you're having a pretty special year." 

Wisconsin's season certainly qualifies to date, and it will be extra special if the Badgers can finish strong. 

The Badgers already have recorded their first win against the nation's No. 1 team since 1981, beating Ohio State on Oct. 16. A week later, Bielema recorded his first road win against a ranked Big Ten opponent when Wisconsin rallied to beat Iowa 31-30. 

Wisconsin now takes aim at another milestone. 

Although five of Wisconsin's last seven losses have come on the road, including an Oct. 2 defeat at Michigan State, it boasts a senior-laden team that knows what to expect. 

"Early on, you might have those big eyes and you’re caught up in the moment," Tolzien said, "but as you get older, you realize it's not too much different than a home game, aside from the communication element. The field is still same size and the game is still played the same way." 

Bielema anticipated the struggles at Michigan would be brought up this week, so he discussed it briefly with the team after the Indiana win and again on Sunday. 

"The biggest thing is that part of our history happened in the past," he said. "We embraced it and learned from it. Moving forward, this is a different team." 

One that hopes to get a different result in Ann Arbor.

gobluebilly

November 17th, 2010 at 5:09 PM ^

I had a lengthy discussion with a serious RRod hater this morning who knows that Michigan will get whacked this weekend. I offered to make a (for me) sizable bet if he gave me Michigan +14.5 -- and he took the bet. Amazing how negative UM fans are about this game.

mclub

November 17th, 2010 at 5:18 PM ^

I have been thinking about this all week.  Reverse line movement in this instance would point toward Michigan being the smart bet.  My gut and knowledge of the two teams make me think Wisconsin would be the smart play for those that bet.  I just want Michigan to win, but this could be an indicator.  The majority of Vegas money is on Wisconsin yet the line is going down AND Michigan is 0-6 ATS.  False hope or not, this gave me a little confidence for saturday.