title says it all. Never sounded like he was that high on Michigan, and hopefully can lean Berger closer to Michigan. Good pickup for the bux though
Mike Lantry, 1972
Maybe, for the people who don't know what prospect you are talking about, you can actually say his name. Maybe.
As I post this, you put his name in. Oh well
is Hubbard like the title says.
Yea when he first posted it, it did not say his name, which is why I said what I said.
The name is Horace.. Monster Squad anyone?
Edit: maybe it was Lawrence? I was pretty young when that came out
Moeller LB Prospect Hubbards are there?
Not everyone knows the school every recruit goes to and how many recruits are at every single school.
Obviously those people don't care very much.
and only vaguely realized Moeller was a HS and not our former coach.
Eleven Warriors delivered a recruit to Ohio? Jus' kiddin' you might go with "per" rather than "via". Cheers and Go Blue.
"Good pickup for the bux though"
The bux - you know, the money they pay out for players. He must have been cheap, or he has a high ceiling. Apparently the Elven Warriors paid him to go to tOSU.
Who did my Pirates sign?
I believe it was Tampa Bay
Never a good pick up for ohio, they all suck!?!?!?!
Make sure to update us with all OSU commits, especially those reported by 11 Warriors. While at it, pease provided real time updates for any MSU and Notre Dame commits. I'll be on the edge of my seat in the mean time.
Note: Michigan and OSU are football rivals. That rivalry is kind of important to some of us here.
OP - thanks for letting us know (not sarcastic).
I bet if Peppers, Hand, or Berger committed to osu, there would be threads about it. So what's the difference. Sorry for trying to pass on info- tough crowd tonight I guess
Who Michigan expected to get or something, then I think it is thread worthy.
Last year I think UM offered over 150 kids and I know we did not see a thread for everyone who committed elsewhere...just the ones the fans were following.
Otherwise, it really doesn't qualify as news in my opinion. Kind of like when Michigan doesn't offer a player....or when Rutgers wins a BB game.
In all fairness, this guy is not on their level. He's one of the lower rated prospects either team has offered. I'm not saying it's insignificant, but this is not like getting Hand or Peppers.
I don't have a problem with your posting on the commit; the young man was offered by Michigan.
I'd leave alone any comment regarding the "crowd" as the standard is always high.
Meh..so what is everyone drinking on Final Four Eve ?
Natural fucking Ice.
You watching the game from the toilet tomorrow?
We already have the best linebacker in Ohio.
.....has an "Old Mother" ????
In future posts like these, could everyone include the stars/rankings of these guys so I can actually know whether or not to be alarmed. Also, if Michigan offered. Thanks.
Michigan offered, but not a high level prospect (per Rivals).
Since we have such a small class this year, I would have been disappointed if he committed to Michigan. I prefer some other recruits.
he's more under the radar, because he was believed to be focusing on lacrosse (and already commited to ND) before this. you can bet if he had offers from hoke/mattison and urban that he's a high level prospect, regardless of what his rankings say.
that having been said, i like berger better for that SAM spot because hubbard is a man-child already (6'6" 225lb), and will likely outgrow the SAM spot soon. a college S&C program practically guarantees he gets up to the 250's or even 260, so he'll likely be on the DL in a few years. we need SAM strictly
Solid 4* on Scout.com, though. Ranked as the #18 OLB prospect, listed as 6'6", though, so I wonder if he ends up on the DL instead.
I'm mildly disappointed but this was 100% expected.
A good rule of thumb: if UM and OSU have both offered, don't worry too much about his star rating. With how well those teams recruit, any kid with offers from both is a top prospect.
it is one right?
...I should care about this?
Mr. Yost: If you don't want to read it, click another topic. There are plenty.
This is just one example. You react the same way when people trash your depth charts.
Your trying too hard OMG Shirtless
You know I respect you as a poster, but you're wrong on this one my man...
I really would like to know why I should care. Was this guy a Michigan legacy? Is he a prospect? What is the reason that he's such a big deal?
It could've been worded differently, but I still don't know what makes this player any different from any other Ohio commit from the state of Ohio.
Damon Webb? I got that, he's from Michigan and from a pipeline school. He was also a prospect and a position of need.
Not sure about "Moller LB Prospect Hubbard"
...would you care to explain? Or do you want to continue reaching for something you're completely wrong about?
Edit: And people don't usually trash my depth charts...just you. Sure there's an em0 comment in there, but that's about it. Normally it's useful opinion and discussion. That is until people like yourself take it upon themselves to be the big bad board bully.
A. There is no reason you should respect me as a poster.
B. I don't care about this thread either. I just thought it was funny that you made that sort of comment when you seem to be one of the, "If you don't care about it, don't click it," posters.
That's why you are wrong.
I was generally trying to figure out why this player mattered.
He's a 4* LB from Ohio that went to Ohio.
Again, is he a Michigan legacy? Was he previously committed to Michigan? etc.
It's not like he's a top prospect, it's not like he's from Michigan or Cass Tech.
You haven't told me otherwise. But as of now (because you haven't told me why he matters) I know that if an Ohio fan would've started this thread it would've been considered trolling by 100% of this board. So because a Michigan fan started it, I'm trying to figure out why it's not.
Again, this is FAR from what you're comparing it to. In fact, it's not even close.
To me, your comment appeared to be snarkier and more sarcastic than you intended it to be. That's my bad. I sincerly apologize and ask for your forgiveness for so drastically misreading your comment. (Will this get you to stop responding with multiple paragraphs?)
SIDENOTE: I have absolutely no idea why this matters. If I had time to comment when this was posted yesterday I would have launched my standard snark attack at the OP.
...doesn't become you.
In fact it's even worse when YOU respond with multiple paragraphs as well (then complain about it). Or when you respond at all and complain about someone else responding.
It's a message board, no one is forcing you to talk, type, respond. If you do, clearly you're interested in holding discussion.
In short...you're doing it wrong.
The kid originally picked LAX over football. So 1) one has to question his love for football and 2) Why would he then go drop LAX and ND for football at Ohio? Maybe I am missing something but sounds a bit strange.
Would you have played pro lacrosse if it were around in your day?
...I don't know what I would have played if I had an opportunity on an equal level to choose between football and lacrosse. It would have been a toss-up.
Thanks for the info. If a kid we offer goes to a rival (ND,State or OSU) I find it interesting and enjoy reading what people think about it, so Thanks