in town for free camps
This spammer "agree[s] with your Blog and . . . will be back to check it more in the future so please keep up your word."
Double, Bleacher Report, bad title.
Sounds like the poster hit the trifecta.
Accroding to Steve Wiltfong Fournette To Give Michigan A Look this weekend.
As someone pointed out in the thread, the 247Sports piece was posted last week and it was a portion of Monday Recruitin' as well. It has also come up within other threads, so I believe it is well-established enough that this can come down. Also, Bleacher Report link.
Double, and the last thread had a mod ruling about higher standards for another Meyer/Hernandez thread.
Meta: Gamers Make a freakin Google Doc
This is probably better described as OT, and in any case, it is the OT season and there is clearly a precedent for letting these sorts of threads go during the OT Season. Starting with the last week in August, obviously this will change. Further, mocking (not in a kind way) those who do participate in such threads is not a good idea.
OT: NCAA 14 PS3 Dynasty Spots Open
One thread for everyone's information should be enough. I posted this user's info in the previously created OP so everyone could choose.
Shouldn't have been a diary, corrected with a board post by the same name.
Posted a better explanation above, but former rival players getting arrested doesn't in and of itself make for a good board topic. The best standard to apply would probably be to think if it would get posted on a neutral conference team's board. Ray Small's problems aren't particularly interesting and he's not a big celebrity, so pretty much the only reason for the post was mockery, which isn't cool.
And tke like a minute to load it's time for a new mod thread? So it can stay on one page?
OT: Bondo repair kit
I woke up this morning to five instances of this thread - well done, MGoBlog!
I pared it down to just the one, but a great exercise in late night posting, to be sure.
SI.com: Mitch McGary feature story
This is a great article, but it was posted yesterday. Definitely worth a read though, as the original thread should be near the top of the second page.
JGB: Thanks for the edit. I realized shortly after posting my second reply how stupid it was to include the same info in the reply I had just complained about, but it was responded to before I could chop it off. Your assumption, as posted in the thread, is correct.
Definitely agree with you on all that.
No one possible uses all those nicknames for opposing teams and guys seriously, do they?