WingsNWolverines

October 27th, 2012 at 10:40 PM ^

PUT FUCKING RAWLS OR HAYES IN FOR GOD SAKE. Fitz can't even gain 6 + yards a carry anymore. I don't understand a few things. A lot of these fucking play calls by Borges and why not put Gardner in at QB. BELLOMY HAS ZERO EXPERIENCE. This game is fucking bull shit and these refs totally sucked our d*cks on that last drive and we still only managed a field goal. We are nothing without Denard.

Joined: 04/27/2011

MGoPoints: 587

Leonhall

October 27th, 2012 at 10:41 PM ^

Anybody asked this staff why Rawls doesn't play? He may not be great but his last appearance about a month ago he looked a helluva lot better than fitz. Without denard we have no shot, he'll we haven't scored with Denard.

Joined: 06/14/2012

MGoPoints: 16430

Electron Erectshon

October 27th, 2012 at 10:41 PM ^

There's no excuse for Borges not being able to turn to Gardner in this situation. When your redshirt backup QB can hardly lead the team to a 1-yard gain, there has to be a better option. Gardner is a talent and should be able to come in at this moment and give Michigan a chance to win a game where the defense is playing so valiantly. Darn shame folks.

Joined: 07/02/2008

MGoPoints: 34

Electron Erectshon

October 27th, 2012 at 11:09 PM ^

Right dude. Gardner didn't improve enough to beat out Russell Bellomy for backup QB responsibilities. Or even 3rd string responsibilities when things get utterly desperate? Like right now? Gimme a break. This is poor decision-making by the offense coordinator (and by extension Hoke), plain and simple. And it's sad. Because people like you will be making excuses for it over the next 5+ years. Just like y'all did for Lloyd. Whatever. I don't care anymore.

Joined: 07/02/2008

MGoPoints: 34

TruBluMich

October 27th, 2012 at 10:42 PM ^

How many times this year have we ran an option? So let's run it on 3rd in the red zone with our slower QB. Great call Borges, I'm sure Nebraska never practices against a slow moving option!!!!

Joined: 08/03/2011

MGoPoints: 21857

jdon

October 27th, 2012 at 10:42 PM ^

you telling me devin gardner can't take one snap at quarterback?  wtf?  I would have felt much better with him running the option....

 

and can our safties get any deeper?

 

Joined: 09/28/2009

MGoPoints: 5906

Tagg

October 27th, 2012 at 10:49 PM ^

Couldn't be this frustrating. There's at least a chance of a goal on any shot where in football you pretty much have to cross the 30 to get anything.

Joined: 09/02/2008

MGoPoints: 897