Michigan opens as 12pt fav over NWestern

Submitted by I Like Burgers on

So this is interesting...betonline has listed Michigan as a 10pt favorite over Northwestern.  It opened at 12 points, but dropped pretty much right away.  

Guess the score is going to be 13-3?

getsome

October 4th, 2015 at 6:41 PM ^

crazy thing is many people do not understand thats how books operate.  

many games tend to end up accurate and on line but its a by product of attempting to draw equal action, balance the book and rake in the juice.  who knows though, maybe i would not know either if i were not a degenerate

Muttley

October 4th, 2015 at 8:05 PM ^

Yes, "Vegas" finds the market price for the spread.

If the market spread were consistently predictably wrong, there would be easy money to be made (over multiple plays).  In most liquid markets, any knowledge of easy money to be made draws the smart money in volume to that side, which causes the market price to become the price at which there's no easy money to be made.

stephenrjking

October 4th, 2015 at 4:23 PM ^

Yeah. If Northwestern players were wearing, say, Oklahoma jerseys, they would be a top five team right now. Our defense is great, but Northwestern beat a good Duke team and absolutely throttled a Stanford team that is suddenly lighting up the Pac 12. They're good and have one of the best wins in the country. I think it's a tossup. No way this should be a big line.

sum1valiant

October 4th, 2015 at 5:17 PM ^

It was 16-6 I believe. Not sure if you watched the lay game or not, but I thought it was blatantly obvious about midway through the second quarter that stanford had zero chance of moving the ball on them. NW's d is elite, at least thus far.

1464

October 4th, 2015 at 5:40 PM ^

Wish we had a team that has let up an average of 3.5 points over the last 4 games.

Your point stands about their defense, but I just like that statistic. Over out entire season, INCLUDING the loss, our defense is giving up 7 points per game.  We are into the B1G season and averaging a TD a game against.  That is just ridiculous.

ijohnb

October 5th, 2015 at 7:06 AM ^

is a false instinct. State has built a really good program and will be difficult to beat every year. We can be a really good team and still lose to State. Those two things are no longer mutually exclusive.

rambouhh

October 4th, 2015 at 11:03 PM ^

I think are stats are more impressive. If we didn't have a pick six we would have less points per game and we are averaging I think around 60 yards less a game. We are also averaging less yards per play. Both extremely impressive but I say ours are a little bit more impressive.

alum96

October 4th, 2015 at 3:46 PM ^

Are you sure t12 is not the over under???

I find that surprising and it's a sign of lack of respect.  It's bulletin board material.  It puts a chip on their shoulder.

Oh wait, that's MSU.

This game feels like 17-9 type of game so I like those pts.  

The FannMan

October 4th, 2015 at 3:49 PM ^

A line is a business proposition not a prediction. The house wants to spread the money and live on its cut. That said, 10 points seems like a lot. It's as if they want to push people to bet on NW.

CoverZero

October 4th, 2015 at 3:50 PM ^

12pts seems very high. I bet that will bet down.

BTW speaking of Wolverines and teams from Chicago... Charles Woodson just got his 62nd career INT vs. the Bears...and then he pointed, said something and threw the ball up in to the stands to the Bears fans.

WolverineHistorian

October 4th, 2015 at 3:55 PM ^

The better question is, after what we've seen the last two years, is Michigan/Northwestern going to be another game where football goes to die? Football so ugly it might give you eye cancer? Maybe the change of scenery from two straight in Evanston will change that. How great would it be to go all BYU on them? If the Northwestern team that played Ball State shows up at the big house, we may just get that. But that would be too cool. In reality, we'll probably be playing the Northwestern team who beat Stanford.

WolverineHistorian

October 4th, 2015 at 4:24 PM ^

Probably. I know Northwestern has a freshman QB, I don't know his stats, I'll have to look them up. But he's about to come into a much more hostile enviornment than their other road game at Duke, against an excellent defense. If we can avoid turnovers (I know, big if) we'll be in pretty good shape. Rudock doesn't have to be a super star, just have a solid afternoon. If he could finally hook up on one of those deep passes to Chesson, I think that could do a world of wonders. But yes, I'm prepared for a slugfest.

alum96

October 4th, 2015 at 4:52 PM ^

His stats generally are mediocre but he is a true freshman who will get better with time - had a good week vs Minn.  But he is mobile .  Sort of like the Oregon State QB.  The "near miss" turnovers Rudock has made the past 2 weeks however will probably be real turnovers vs NW.  

NW has a very good RB - stop him and they have to rely on a not good passing game.  So key is to stop him and not do turnovers.  NW has good special teams as well.  These teams are very similar - built on defense and improved special teams with questionable offenses.  Ours is less questionable but their running back is more established and proven.

clarkiefromcanada

October 4th, 2015 at 5:41 PM ^

This is Vegas thinking. Michigan's defense is, to this point, as good as any of us have seen since 2006 or 1997. They give up 100 total yards a week to P5 teams (not normal). NW running back is solid but not perceived as better than Hine from BYU, preseason, for example.

Thinking back to Vegas, Michigan gets 3 to 3.5 points as the home team and Vegas then added +9 as margin (thus the +12 line). This will probably get bet down to 8 or 9 by game time but it's difficult to bet against a defense playing that elite.