Michigan (Football and Academic) History
MGoBloggers,
I've been reading a book about the history of the Notre Dame and Michigan rivalry, which some of you may have read. It is called "Natural Enemies" by John Kryk and it is great. If you haven't read it yet, it is definitely worth checking out. It reads almost more like a history textbook than a novel like "Three & Out."
While reading, I came across one of my favorite pieces of UM history, which I have noticed a lot of fans don't know about. The fans here at MGoBlog are pretty knowledgeable, but I thought I'd make a post just in case some people didn't. You can read the relevant section at the top of page 6 here: http://books.google.com/books?id=IBzFV5QGSv0C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false.
"[I]n 1881 . . . Michigan traveled east to play the best teams anywhere--the mighty trio of Yale, Harvard, and Princeton. The Wolverines lost all three hames but the scores were respectable, especially considering the games were played within the span of a week. The Easterners, in fact, were so impressed they later invited Michigan to join the Eastern College League, but Michigan's faculty would not permit the Wolverines to join such a faraway association for mere athletics."
This was a bit before the Ivy League precursor (which would initially include Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and Cornell) was formed. The major takeaway is that effectively Michigan was asked to join the Ivy League and said no. The Ivy League obviously isn't an "academic conference" and we are clearly a bit better than their athletic standard. Nonetheless, it is a fun fact to have on hand.
Go Blue!
January 16th, 2012 at 6:45 PM ^
Never ever heard that ever.
I don't know what's more interesting: We were kinda-sorta invited to join the pre-Ivy League or that I've never even heard Greg from MVictors mention this.
January 16th, 2012 at 7:08 PM ^
If we had said yes would Michigan football as it is known today exist?
January 16th, 2012 at 7:08 PM ^
I was not aware of that, thanks for sharing it.
It does make you wonder how things might have turned out differently, had UM joined the Ivy League.
January 16th, 2012 at 7:09 PM ^
I'm surprised I didn't learn this in John Bacon's History of College Athletics class...
January 16th, 2012 at 7:12 PM ^
we said no cause we don't like nerds.
January 17th, 2012 at 8:55 AM ^
Yup, Michigan has no nerds...
at all...
January 17th, 2012 at 12:30 PM ^
It's John Kryk. Probably an autocorrect. Great book, always good to bring up that history.
January 16th, 2012 at 10:16 PM ^
January 17th, 2012 at 1:30 AM ^
Actually, I didn't know that. Although, I've never read 'Natural Enemies,' either.
I must now hang my head in shame.
January 17th, 2012 at 7:01 AM ^
Mr Historian. My point was if you do not know this then no one knows this. Im surprised that this is not used as a marketing campaign by the U. Or at least by some crazy lil bro hating fan.
January 16th, 2012 at 10:49 PM ^
The faculty, students, and alumni of Harvard, Cornell, Columbia, Yale, and Penn would disagree just a little bit with your assertion.
January 17th, 2012 at 7:02 AM ^
correct answer, good sir.
January 17th, 2012 at 7:19 AM ^
Cornell, Brown, and Dartmouth, although great, are a little overrated by being in the Ivy league. Princeton IMO is in the top 3 for Ivies and you failed to mention it.
January 17th, 2012 at 8:54 AM ^
Perhaps in an alternate universe, Michigan would be dominant in squash and lacrosse. Oh yeah, that last one might come true still...