Michigan 4th choice in Vegas for NC

Submitted by johnthesavage on

This is actually pretty crazy to me:

http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-football/odds/futures/

We're 10:1, behind only OSU, Baylor, and LSU. Man. I'm probably one of the least surprised Michigan fans by this year -- the team has talent and Harbaugh has turned things around quickly before. But I'm surprised. I was in Vegas before the season started and almost bet on us to win the national championship, but we were only 40:1 at the time. I guess I made a mistake!

UM Fan from Sydney

October 12th, 2015 at 1:55 PM ^

Everyone needs to just pump the brakes. We still have to get through seven more games (just to get in the playoff), which includes MSU and OSU, which won't be easy.

UM Fan from Sydney

October 12th, 2015 at 2:08 PM ^

Well, I don't really mean that. The team needs to only think about MSU right now, but we can talk about future games; only future games that we know will happen. Talking about UM's being in the playoff right now is a little ridiculous. We're just now getting to the meat of our schedule. This will be the tough part. Thankfully we have both MSU and OSU in Ann Arbor, but they still won't be easy games like we have seen the last three weeks.

Stringer Bell

October 12th, 2015 at 2:48 PM ^

No one thought Northwestern would be easy.  Personally, I think we beat MSU by a pretty healthy margin (unless they magically pull their best performance out of their asses, which is definitely possible).  OSU will be a challenge but they haven't been playing all that great either, and Hoke came awfully close to beating them with struggling teams.

johnthesavage

October 12th, 2015 at 1:59 PM ^

Your avatar is definitely not pumping the brakes!

Anyway, of course there is far to go, but this is a tangible indication of how impressive this team has been, and how impressed the smart people who bet on such things are. I mean, we have a loss and are ranked 12th or 14th. Compare us with:

Florida -- 30:1

MSU -- 20:1

TCU -- 16:1

Utah -- 15:1

Bama -- 12:1

This is just interesting from an academic perspective. This is a team that was 5-7 last year, unranked at the start of the year, and lost their opener. It's week 7. WTH. I doubt there is any historical comparison.

Tater

October 12th, 2015 at 2:24 PM ^

We're fans.  We don't need to "slow down," nor do we need to "pump the brakes."  Our enthusiasm, if anything, is great for the program.  If I ever invite you to a pool party, I am dumping in some extra chlorine...

DrMantisToboggan

October 12th, 2015 at 1:58 PM ^

yep, idc who your running back is, you're not gonna win a playoff without elite QB play. Last year the Heisman winner lost to the only QB playing hotter than the Heisman winner at the time. LSU annually chooses to not try and be good at the most important position on the field. They might win the SEC...maybe...but they aren't winning a playoff. 

lilpenny1316

October 12th, 2015 at 2:06 PM ^

Vegas is basically saying we have a better chance to not lose another game over Bama.  But Bama is likely a better team.  If you put Bama, TCU ot maybe Clemson in the B1G, their odds are probably better than ours.

If we beat Sparty, then I will like our odds a whole lot more.

MileHighWolverine

October 12th, 2015 at 2:31 PM ^

I think what Vegas is really saying is: "MIchigan has a lot of passionate and wealthy fans that will bet on their team to win if we make it enticing enough. Even nominal betting amounts across that many people will make us a lot of money.....we should put them as the 4th most likely team to win".

That, or people are betting on us enough to push the line down from 40-1 to 10-1 odds.

1464

October 12th, 2015 at 3:00 PM ^

It makes no sense...

1. We know Michigan fans will bet.

2. Let's entice them to bet more.

3. Lower the payout for them winning it all.

4. Profit???

 

The reverse would be true.  If they wanted us Michigan suckers to bet, they'd give us 1,000:1 odds.  THAT would entice people to bet for Michigan and lose all of their money.  The opposite means they don't wnat people to bet on Michigan, because they think we are good.

M Squared

October 12th, 2015 at 4:07 PM ^

MHW, you're not thinking of this in the context of a free market.  

Book 1: 10-1 Michigan

Book 2: 15-1 Michigan

Obviously, Book 2 will get the Michigan money.  Setting Michigan at 10-1 is a signal from the sportsbooks that they do not want to take any more money on Michigan.  They want the money instead to go on other teams. 

 

doggdetroit

October 12th, 2015 at 2:37 PM ^

I agree with Alabama since they are Michigan on steroids, but disagree on TCU. Minnesota is probably the 4th best team in the weak West and held TCU (pre-injuries) to by far their lowest offensive output this season and despite its anemic offense still had the oppurtunity to win the the game on its final drive. Clemson? Maybe, it could go either way.

Hotel Putingrad

October 12th, 2015 at 2:18 PM ^

we know from last year that the B1G champ will make the playoff. It's not much of a stretch to envision M or OSU beating Iowa in the title game, and no one will beat this staff in the semifinal with 4 weeks to prepare. So then you're looking at a coin flip for the title. Pretty simple, really.

BlowGoo

October 12th, 2015 at 2:29 PM ^

Strictly speaking, this isn't Vegas declaring us the fourth most likely team to win the NC.

 

It is just that they are less willing to pay out substantially on that bet than they used to be because enough people are betting on Michigan to win the NC that it becomes ecoomically dangerous for Vegas to put a rich payout on that bet, because should Michigan win, it would be too costly.

 

Remember, Vegas just wants everyone to bet equally so that winners and losers cancel each other out and Vegas makes its money by taking a percent of the bet itself, won or lost.  That's what's safest for them.

 

Michigan, with its HUGE support base, is going to be more susceptible to a little "irrational exuberance" than most other programs.  So when things are going well, people get more happy, a little TOO happy, and they bet a little bit TOO much.  And Vegas has to adjust to protect itself economically, so it drops the odds.  Not from any direct football info, but just bet volume.

That said, people get exuberant and bet on a team when there is good football info out there.  It's just that they tend to overvalue that info, and hence make an overvalued bet, when it's a team to which they have emotioinal ties.  Like our beloved Wolverines.

 

But you all mostly knew this already.

Mr Miggle

October 12th, 2015 at 3:43 PM ^

There are differences. They change the championship odds based on performance. They're not waiting while we're shellacking Northwestern to see how much money comes in on us. They'll move the line proactively. Their profit margin on these bets is larger than on games, so they've got more leeway to set odds that will attract money.

 

Franz Schubert

October 12th, 2015 at 3:51 PM ^

This again! This is not true. Period. If big fanbases determined point spreads like this simplistic view implies then anyone could just bet against the biggest fanbases and invariably get inflated odds. Winning would be so simple, so why dont those who continue to post this myth take advantage of it and bet against the big fanbases.This is laughable. Sure lines get tweaked some here and there but it is within a narrow range, otherwise the sharps would come in late and make a killing on skewed lines. Think about it before you post this garbage. 

Remember it is the sharps that actually bet the most volume on most games so fanbases are not the primary driver of the line.

Furthermore, even if the largest fanbases were the primary driver of lines (they are not), people do not just bet with their heart. Im pretty sure when it comes to finances people are not just going to be stupid and throw away their money based on homerism. 

And lastly, for every homer that would bet with his heart, there is a rival fan that would do likewise in the opposite direction. 

In reply to by Franz Schubert

BlowGoo

October 12th, 2015 at 6:58 PM ^

Okay.

I feel that casino employees often don't take X's and O's into account when creating odds and that that is not something many people realize.

I also sincerely feel that casino employees, when dealing with teams such as Notre Dame, Texas, Alabama, and others, teams that will be bet simply because who they are, are treated differently by oddsmakers simply because they are guaranteed to take action regardless of who, where, and when they play.

 

I sincerely feel this way because this is exactly what they say they do.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2104561-inside-look-at-how-las-vegas-oddsmakers-come-up-with-college-football-spread

Relevant quote:

"There’s also the issue of dealing with teams—Notre Dame, Texas, Alabama and others—that will be bet simply because who they are. These “public” teams will often be treated differently by oddsmakers simply because they are guaranteed to take action regardless of who they play, where they play and when they play.
 
“ 'Xs and Os really aren’t being taken into account when creating these odds, and that’s not something many people realize,' [Todd] Fuhrman [Gaming Analyst for CBS, formerly of Caesars. See http://www.linkedin.com/pub/todd-fuhrman/31/ba7/ba0 ]  said. 'It’s data, numbers and an understanding of the market.' "
 
 
What's cool is that there IS an initial setting of odds/spreads based on proprietary rankings that get adjusted as the bets come in.  The Prediction Machine, cited in above article, just moved Michigan up to number six in that ranking system: www.predictionmachine.com/Team-Rankings
 
Note MSU is #24 under The Prediction Machine, FWIW.
 
I respect that the process might be different for proposition betting and odds-setting than this article describes as someone else posted, but I sincerely doubt it.
 
Anyway, Franz, try to be more constructive and infomative, and generally less dickish before you post YOUR garbage.  Thanks. You're a peach. /bird

San Diego Mick

October 12th, 2015 at 2:30 PM ^

we will keep improving and becoming an even better team going forward, that's my bet, all other things will work themselves out, I like what I'm seeing so far, this is fun!

GoBlueNorth

October 12th, 2015 at 3:45 PM ^

It bothers me that many fans are looking past Penn State, Minny, Indiana and yes even Rutgers.........   On any given Saturday even a bad team can spoil your season.  Let's be excited one game at a time and hope for a great run.   

I have family who are State fans and Alumni and truth be told they are the most obnoxious fan base (especially the last few years).  There are a great many MIchigan fans starting to sound just like them.

Let's enjoy the best football we've seen in a long time and run with it.

 

Durham Blue

October 12th, 2015 at 7:16 PM ^

I got Michigan to win the B1G at 16:1 before the season started.  I also got Michigan to win the NC at 150:1, one week before the BYU shutout and the odds plummeted to 50:1.  Now I think they're at 22:1 to win the NC.