Home
supporting the Clint Eastwood State Fightin' John Waynes since 2011

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Brice's Recruiting
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Football Recruiting
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Find the best US sports betting sites on the web at onlinebetting.com. Sports wagering is getting more and more popular each year, so place your bets online today.

Enjoy online gambling? Why not try online poker or online roulette? Especially online roulette for real money. If you are going to play poker, then make sure you use the PartyPoker bonus code or PokerStars marketing code when signing up to these two poker giants.

If you're looking for online sports betting, Sportsbooks is your best option. Nothing else compares in variety and reliability.

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Always better to play free blackjack and free Flash slots online before making a purchase on any real online casino.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Michigan Football 101
    cstalionsuofm - 11 hours ago
  • The Blockhams in "TACKLING TECHNIQUE"
    Six Zero - 23 hours ago
  • College Football 101 (#100)
    cstalionsuofm - 1 day ago
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings: 5-21-12
    Ace - 1 day ago
  • College Football 101
    cstalionsuofm - 2 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Dear Mr. Woodson; Quit talking to Mark Snyder.
    Section 1 - 4,994 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings: 5-21-12
    Ace - 3,540 views
  • Nebraska Recruiting, Michigan and the rest of the B1G
    UMgradMSUdad - 3,032 views
  • College Football 101
    cstalionsuofm - 1,672 views
  • Space, bitches...wallpaper edition...
    jonvalk - 1,589 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Dear Mr. Woodson; Quit talking to Mark Snyder.
    Section 1 - 137 comments
  • College Football 101
    cstalionsuofm - 44 comments
  • Conference Champions Only? A Playoff Case Study
    stephenrjking - 38 comments
  • Choosing Playoff Participants: Poll, Committee, or Autobid?
    oakapple - 27 comments
  • College Football 101 (#100)
    cstalionsuofm - 15 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Just a link to the next in the Pro Combat series over at BHGP.
    0 replies
  • The real reason Michigan will be able to torture Ohio (spin off from Mgo.licio)
    14 replies
  • Commit Watch? Buckle Up
    88 replies
  • College Football 101 (#99)
    35 replies
  • Michigan has interest in ATH Darren Carrington
    35 replies
  • Michigan Profits $79K from Sugar Bowl
    25 replies
  • Bruce Feldman profile of William Gholston
    51 replies
  • OT: Suggest Crazy Names for Michigan Coaching Positions (a la Stanford)
    69 replies
  • SIAP: When do single game tickets go on sale?
    13 replies
  • Rich Maloney and Michigan Part Ways
    50 replies
  • OT - Stanford names OC position after Andrew Luck
    57 replies
  • Brandon, Hollis nominated for SBJ Athletic Director of the Year
    19 replies
  • College Football Resumes in 100 days
    16 replies
  • OT: More Big XII Expansion Info
    74 replies
  • Borges loves recruiting to Michigan
    51 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • College Football 101 (#99)
    35 replies
  • Michigan Profits $79K from Sugar Bowl
    25 replies
  • Rich Maloney and Michigan Part Ways
    50 replies
  • Commit Watch? Buckle Up
    88 replies
  • Michigan has interest in ATH Darren Carrington
    35 replies
  • ESPN: Coaches Fans Hate (refers to UM Fans hating Tressel and GRob)
    49 replies
  • OT: Just a link to the next in the Pro Combat series over at BHGP.
    0 replies
  • The real reason Michigan will be able to torture Ohio (spin off from Mgo.licio)
    14 replies
  • Bruce Feldman profile of William Gholston
    51 replies
  • OT: Suggest Crazy Names for Michigan Coaching Positions (a la Stanford)
    69 replies
  • OT: More Big XII Expansion Info
    74 replies
  • Borges loves recruiting to Michigan
    51 replies
  • SIAP: When do single game tickets go on sale?
    13 replies
  • Brandon, Hollis nominated for SBJ Athletic Director of the Year
    19 replies
  • Michigan/'Bama Super Regional Softball Preview
    27 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Friday Afternoon "Whatcha Doing?" Open Posbang Thread
    252 replies
  • DAB: Alternate FB Uni Plan Forthcoming
    150 replies
  • MICHIGAN SOFTBALL: REGIONAL CHAMPS
    147 replies
  • Softball vs. Louisville open thread
    111 replies
  • OT: Champions League final discussion & live thread
    98 replies
  • Devin Gardner changes Number
    96 replies
  • Dallas Morning News: Big 12 Source said "We Might Be Moving Toward 4 Superconferences"
    96 replies
  • 5 star RB Davis to USC
    95 replies
  • Scout revamps their player rankings
    95 replies
  • OT: FSU to Big 12 talk picking up heat. Clemson and Georgia Tech in talks with big 12
    94 replies
  • Roy Roundtree to wear #21
    94 replies
  • FWIW Probable USC commit S'ua Craven has narrowed his list
    89 replies
  • OT-Pam Ward removed from ESPN college football coverage
    89 replies
  • OT: James Bond Skyfall Trailer Edit: & Top 5 Bond movies list
    88 replies
  • Commit Watch? Buckle Up
    88 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Former Michigan players see Wolverines 'torturing' Urban Meyer and Ohio State in coming years

    There's absolutely no way that ends up on a bulletin board somewhere

    0 comments
  • Former U-M tight end Bennie Joppru, 32, recovering from stroke

    best wishes

    2 comments
  • Michigan's Lewan maturing into a leader

    but what about the bike?

    1 comments
  • Relegation in College Football!

    amazingly, we don't go down in 2008.

    2 comments
  • Newest commit Copp discusses high-school football career, decision to pursue hockey

    “We’ve had season tickets (at Yost Ice Arena) ever since I was born,” he said. “It’s always been the dream to play there.”

    0 comments
  • FACES OF DESPAIR: BIG TEN MEETINGS

    "The wolf is the only constant, Adam. It takes care of its own and lives in the wound called the world. She rips it anew each day for the blood she needs to survive."

    0 comments
  • DTotD: An overhead kick to the throat in MLS

    Justin Meram didn't just score

    0 comments
  • Devin Booker blowing up, sticking to roots

    offer coming in a month, most likely

    0 comments
  • Versatile Nik Stauskas ready to do a bit of everything for the Michigan basketball team

    "I had so many Michigan fans and other people messaging me on Twitter and saying 'I hope you're ready to play point guard. I was a little bit worried."

    1 comments
  • Eso Akunne of Michigan Wolverines holds memories of mom close

    "Come home. We need to talk about mom."

    0 comments
  • Get Familiar: Michigan verbal Taco Charlton

    Enjoys things with "game" in the title.

    2 comments
  • Scouting Video: Derrick Walton at 2012 Spiece Run ‘n Slam

    sounds like all three Michigan commits are improving their stock so far

    0 comments
  • WTKA 1050AM Mott Takeover Schedule

    all of the people

    0 comments
  • Borges on Alabama game: Preparation 'has already begun'

    I'd hope so

    0 comments
  • Glen Steele tribute - YouTube

    one of the greatest names of all time #ofalltime

    1 comments

Mgopoll

50 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
February 22nd, 2012 at 10:59 AM
#1
jtblue
jtblue's picture
Joined: 11/12/2009
MGoPoints: 855
Mgopoll

Coach Beilein has a couple of years on Coach Hoke in regard to building a program with his players. Having said that which team do you think is more likely to win the next National Championship? 

My answer: Basketball. The chaotic structure of the one and done NCAA tournament often prevents elite teams from winning it all. HOWEVA, it gives as much as it takes away - providing opportunity for hot teams to string together 3 good weekends of basketball and a national championship. Football requires a full season of perfection, and a little good fortune. I think Coach Hoke will have his team in position in short order, but I'm going with Beilein to get there first.

An interesting debate no doubt...What say you?

edit: Option 3: Hockey. Does Red beat them to the punch?

Tai Streets is still open...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • basketball

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:02 AM | I say Hockey...what that (Score:5 Normal)
Baldbill
Baldbill's picture
Joined: 04/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1651

I say Hockey...what that wasn't a choice?  ;-)

Semper Fidelis

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:20 AM | Co-sign (Score:3 Normal)
Mr. Robot
Mr. Robot's picture
Joined: 10/27/2009
MGoPoints: 1433

We had a tiny senior class this year and got a whole bunch of production out of our freshman. Next year, those freshman are sophomores, the upperclassmen have another offseason to improve as well, and we have an absolutely AWESOME recruiting class coming in.

Not only could next year be something special, but we're looking good for several years to come.

"Good evening, and welcome to Michigan Stadium for this the one-hundred thirty-second season of Michigan football, and the thirty-ninth meeting between Michigan and Notre Dame." -Carl Grapentine, September 10, 2011

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:25 AM | Hunwick (Score:2)
BrownJuggernaut
Joined: 10/02/2010
MGoPoints: 2028

Losing Hunwick will hurt though. While it may be insulting to call him a stop gap, he's sort of been just that with Hogan getting hurt and the guys we had coming in jumping to the OHL (insert fist shaking emoticon). We're going to miss his experience at that position.

However, I think we have a decent chance this season. We're just playing so well, since the return of Jonny M. Now, I think a lot of next year will depend on whether we can keep him. The Devils might feel it's the right time. You could say similar things about Moffie. If you keep those two, you're going to have a solid base, especially with Trouba coming in.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:56 AM | Jon will almost certainly (Score:2)
Mr. Robot
Mr. Robot's picture
Joined: 10/27/2009
MGoPoints: 1433

Jon will almost certainly come back. If he was going to make the jump there is no way he would have endured a half-season suspension when he could have just gone to the OHL and kept playing. The Devil's are also aware of why he was suspended and will probably be cool with him taking at least another year to develop and mature, not to mention the fact they have a good track record of letting us keep our players for 4 years.

Hunwick will definitely be missed, but I don't expect Rutledge will be a liability by any means. He may not immediately put up the numbers Hunwick did, but I expect him to be solid, and I expect the defense to improve next year with the guys coming in. Next year will probably be a bit of a slow start while the freshman get used to the college game, but we tend to finish strong as it is, and with the talent we will have, we can do some serious damage next year.

"Good evening, and welcome to Michigan Stadium for this the one-hundred thirty-second season of Michigan football, and the thirty-ninth meeting between Michigan and Notre Dame." -Carl Grapentine, September 10, 2011

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:50 AM | Funny, I read your post and (Score:2)
unWavering
unWavering's picture
Joined: 01/13/2011
MGoPoints: 1404

Funny, I read your post and thought you were talking about football until I realized what you were responding to.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:07 AM | I think football (Score:3 Normal)
samer
samer's picture
Joined: 05/07/2011
MGoPoints: 577

I think football actually. 

Until our basketball team can beat top teams when we don't shoot well form 3, I don't think we can make a Final Four run. It is too difficult to jump shoot your way to a deep run, because it's hard to shoot the 3 consistently. LAtely Jordan Morgan has been a great inside presence but I'm not sure we can rely on him to win us games against Duke/Kentucky/UNC/etc.

Football, on the other hand, is set up nicely on odd-number years, when we play Notre Dame, Nebraska, and Ohio State at home. While 2013 might not go well (as far as winning a national championship) because we'll have a first-year starter at QB, this year's Alabama team showed that a good defense can take you to the top.

 

 

University of Tom Brady, B.A. '10; University of Peyton Manning, J.D. '13.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:55 AM | You mean like when we beat (Score:5 Normal)
UMpolo1985
Joined: 11/12/2010
MGoPoints: 58

You mean like when we beat Ohio on Saturday while shooting 23% from three?  It's a huge misconception that this team lives and dies by the three.  Yes, we shoot a lot of threes, but some of our biggest wins have been because of our defense, not our shooting.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:14 PM | I was waiting for someone to (Score:3 Normal)
samer
samer's picture
Joined: 05/07/2011
MGoPoints: 577

I was waiting for someone to bring up the OSU game.

We beat OSU not so much because our D was so good, but more because OSU played dumb offense. Had they worked more of an inside-out game, they would have beaten us. 

Look at the scores from when we played ranked teams out of the conference. 73-61 against Memphis. 82-75 against Duke. When we play elite teams, they are going to score more than 60 on us. When they do, we'll need to score more than them to win (I know, John Madden comment). In order to do that, we'll need to shoot well from 3. We almost never score more than 60 points without shooting at least 30% from 3. 

 

University of Tom Brady, B.A. '10; University of Peyton Manning, J.D. '13.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:35 PM | First, I'd say the Memphis (Score:2 Normal)
UMpolo1985
Joined: 11/12/2010
MGoPoints: 58

First, I'd say the Memphis win was absolutely because of our defense.  We held them .88 points per possession that game, it was just played at a much faster pace than most Big Ten games.

Also, 30% is a pretty low standard, I wouldn't consider that shooting "well" from 3.  Most people consider 33% to be average.  Even then, wins this year while shooting under 33% from 3 include Memphis, Wisconsin, MSU, and OSU (essentially our 4 biggest wins).

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:53 PM | You bring up good points, but (Score:2)
samer
samer's picture
Joined: 05/07/2011
MGoPoints: 577

You bring up good points, but what I'm saying is that against high-powered offenses, we'll need to score more. Michigan scores more by shooting from 3. Wisconsin rankes 256th in points per game, so I'm not surprised we kept them to 41 points. 

Memphis is 44th, Ohio State is 36th and MSU is 67th in points per game. The Memphis win was great, and we shot 30% from 3 in that game. 

However, we split against OSU and MSU this season, and that's exactly what I'm talking about. You only get one opportunity in the tourney and I don't think we can rely on our D to keep teams like Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, Carolina, etc. to around 60 points a game. And even when we do, we usually only win by shooting about 30% from 3. 

Look, I hope you're right, but to get past Northwestern last night, we shot 36.8% from 3. To score 70 against Illinois, we shot 43.8%. To score 62 against Nebraska, we shot 45.8% from 3. To score 68 against Indiana, we shot 40.9%. For 66 against Purdue, we shot 42.9%. For 71 against IU, we shot 41.7%.

In the last 10 games, the only times we scored 60 without shooting at least 30% form 3 was against MSU and Arkansas. 

All I'm saying is, if we can rely on our D to hold our opponents to 60, we can be OK. But if we need to score more than 60 to win, we'll need the 3. I don't know if we can shoot that consistently enough to consistently score over 60. 

 

University of Tom Brady, B.A. '10; University of Peyton Manning, J.D. '13.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 2:23 PM | The bigger point is that 30% (Score:2)
BraveWolverine730
BraveWolverine730's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2555

The bigger point is that 30% from 3-pt range isn't that good at all. W beat Memphis because our defense was great and their coach was an idiot. We shot 70% from 2-pt range in that game. That would be a more unsustainable point to argue than merely shooting 30% from 3. Anyway you can't say "we can't beat good teams without shooting awesome from 3." and then when provided with an extremely recent counterexample say that the example doesn't count. 

" I want to win Big 10 titles. Multiply. Consecutively. I just made that word up (multiply). I'm like that. I'm good at Scrabble."

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 3:13 PM | If what I said made it seem (Score:2)
samer
samer's picture
Joined: 05/07/2011
MGoPoints: 577

If what I said made it seem like his argument didn't count, that was not my intention.

What I'm trying to get at is this: When we win by shooting less than 30%, it's because we play really good defense and keep the other team to below 60 points. I don't think our defense will consistently be able to do that. To win a championship, you have to be able to play defense, but you also have to be able to win the high-scoring games when the other team has your defense figured out.

And while 30% isn't that good, it's a percentage that we've fallen below plenty of times. Usually when we do, we don't score 60 points. Sometimes we win, some times we lose. But I can tell you this, if we make an elite Eight run, we won't be able to keep those teams to below 60 points. 

Let's say that the Elite Eight, Final Four, and championship games all require us to score over 60. That means that we need to shoot a high percentage of 3s for three games in a row. We might be able to do that, but it's iffy. 

I also provided several examples where we had to shoot 40% or better to get into the 70-point range. No team can sustain that kind of shooting. 

 

University of Tom Brady, B.A. '10; University of Peyton Manning, J.D. '13.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 1:06 PM | I think it very hard to (Score:1)
BrokenRhino
BrokenRhino's picture
Joined: 10/01/2011
MGoPoints: 73

I think it very hard to compare those out of conference games against Doke and Memphis to now. Our Defense is lightyears ahead of where it was at that time. The team has matured and taken to player defense better than many thought they would at the start o fthe season in Hawaii.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 2:18 PM | I was using those teams more (Score:2)
samer
samer's picture
Joined: 05/07/2011
MGoPoints: 577

I was using those teams more because they are the kinds of teams we'll see in the later rounds of the tourney. Teams that we are unfamiliar with (not B1G teams) and, at least with Duke, good offenses.

 

University of Tom Brady, B.A. '10; University of Peyton Manning, J.D. '13.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:19 PM | rebounding (Score:1)
satellitecampusslap
satellitecampusslap's picture
Joined: 02/22/2012
MGoPoints: 43

has been pretty clutch lately too

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:08 AM | I'd choose Hoke, with (Score:1 Overrated)
jhender85
jhender85's picture
Joined: 10/25/2008
MGoPoints: 560

I'd choose Hoke, without hesitation, and not because I'm a football homer either.

I'd take a Big 10 football schedule over a Big 10 basketball schedule any day.  That and the sheer fact that to get through the NCAA tourney you need an extremely heavy dose of luck to go with your skill. 

I think the basketball team is talentwise the better and more mature of the two (if I'm going to compare apples to oranges), but the level of competition and the luck of the matchup that's prevelant in bball is just too much for me to justify saying Beilein's closer to a national championship.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:15 AM | I'm with you (Score:3 Normal)
Blazefire
Blazefire's picture
Joined: 04/17/2009
MGoPoints: 14093

I'd take a Big 10 football schedule over a Big 10 basketball schedule any day.

Who presents a really really tough challenge on an annual basis in Big Ten football?

OSU

MSU

Wisky

Occasionally maybe PSU and Neb. The other teams can win, but aren't regularly DOMINANT.

Now in basketball?

OSU

MSU

Wisky

Indiana

Illinois

Purdue

Minnesota

The schedule required to get a good seeding that helps win the tourney is tougher in bball.

"This is the EMU game, not the emo game."
  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:54 AM | You categorize MSU as (Score:4 Normal)
unWavering
unWavering's picture
Joined: 01/13/2011
MGoPoints: 1404

You categorize MSU as "dominant" in football?  The past couple years have been good for them, but they certainly aren't dominant.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:30 PM | Wait, MSU is "regularly (Score:3 Normal)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 26839

Wait, MSU is "regularly dominant" and PSU/Neb are just occasional flashes in the pan?  Wha?

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:38 PM | Historically, No (Score:3 Normal)
Blazefire
Blazefire's picture
Joined: 04/17/2009
MGoPoints: 14093

But for the past few years and going forward, looks like it. PSU is now a one legged man in an ass kicking contest, and it's going to take Nebraska a few years to get used to Big play. MSU may not be dominant exactly, but they've had a very nice string of seasons and that's probably not going to end in the next year or two.

"This is the EMU game, not the emo game."
  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 1:10 PM | Clarification (Score:2 Normal)
BrokenRhino
BrokenRhino's picture
Joined: 10/01/2011
MGoPoints: 73

Just to clarify, that is the Nebraska team that destroyed MSU this year, you are talking about right?

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 1:20 PM | Sounds like it.  It's also (Score:2)
jhender85
jhender85's picture
Joined: 10/25/2008
MGoPoints: 560

Sounds like it.  It's also the same Nebraska team that more resembled a down trodden Minnesota than a top tier B1G team against us.

I'm not trying to come to Sparty's aid, but flukes happen.  Honestly tell me if they had played MSU again, do you think they would have won like that?

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:16 PM | This. I'd feel more (Score:1)
StateStreet
StateStreet's picture
Joined: 02/21/2012
MGoPoints: 62

This.

I'd feel more confident that my elite football team could win a national championship than an equally elite basketball team. Even if we get a playoff in football soon, I think I'd feel the same way as long as the playoff is limited to a small number of teams. Way too much luck involved with March Madness, as fun as it is to watch.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:09 AM | tough call (Score:2)
aMAIZEing_BLUE132
Joined: 01/05/2012
MGoPoints: 105

Hoke in 3-5 yrs.

Like you said.  The NCAA tourney is too crazy for me to put my money on Beilein, although I think he's gonna have a very good shot at it starting....now. 

Always reaching for the banner.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:10 AM | Football (Score:4 Normal)
Blue in South Bend
Blue in South Bend's picture
Joined: 08/15/2009
MGoPoints: 26149

But I base this on nothing.

The Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:14 AM | Football. If you look at (Score:1)
artds
artds's picture
Joined: 09/04/2009
MGoPoints: 2258

Football.

If you look at what Hoke is building and the type of players he's brining in (lots of size, emphasis on O-line and linebacker depth, shift in coaching philosophy to defense first, etc.), he's really following the model of teams like Bama and LSU, which has proven to be a successful model. 

It seems like actually scoring points is viewed as a secondary aspect of the game to teams like Bama and LS. When you have size and toughness like those teams do, you don't need to rely on skill position players to win you games.

I love what coach beilein has done for the program, but his system is heavily reliant on the 3-pointer, and that can be hit or miss, which can cost you in games you're supposed to win, as well as in game you need to win.

"WEEELLLL ________."  -- Brady Hoke

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:14 AM | Hoke. The conference is (Score:1)
419Wolverine
419Wolverine's picture
Joined: 02/08/2012
MGoPoints: 29

Hoke. The conference is stronger in bball than it is football. Much easier to get by the likes of Norhtwestern Minn. and Purdue etc. in football than in baketball.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:15 AM | One large obstacle (Score:1 Normal)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 8971

I hate to put it this way, but success in football is going to depend on which Urban Meyer landed in Columbus.  

The worst-case scneario is that he is as good as he was when he won multiple national championships at Florida, and turns the talent to which he has access into a juggernaut.  If this happens, the best we can hope for as Michigan fans is splitting with Ohio from year to year.  

The best-case scenario is that Meyer rode Tim Tebow's coattails, and that he no longer has the patience nor the drive to put in the hours and work that it takes to win championships.  In this scenario, he is the coach who made a mess out of his personal life, let it affect his performance, and quit on his team twice in less than a year.

My fondest hope, and a joker factor, is that the "newer, tougher NCAA" does a real investigation in Columbus and Ohio finally gets what they deserve for their blatant and utter disregard for NCAA rules.  

Brady Hoke is a fine coach, but the "Urban Legend" version of Meyer does have two national championships under his belt.  He could be our worst nightmare, especially if he puts to rest the idiotic notion that "the spread won't work in the Big Ten." 

Either way, the game is on and the rivlary is officially back.

http://tinfoilhatsportsblog.blogspot.com/

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:17 AM | I guarantee you Rural Cryer (Score:-1 Trolling)
dothepose
dothepose's picture
Joined: 12/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3686

I guarantee you Rural Cryer will not win a NC at Ohio. Get that negative attitude out of here mister!

You know, Dude, I myself dabbled in pacifism once. Not in 'Nam of course.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:14 AM | The job that Beilein is doing (Score:2 Normal)
UMICH1606
Joined: 02/21/2010
MGoPoints: 1755

The job that Beilein is doing with essentially one post player and a limited bench is amazing. I can't imagine betting against Beilein when a deeper, more athletic roster arrives.

Of course, that same point can be made for Hoke and Co.

We are blessed fellas. Let the good times roll.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:16 AM | The way recruiting has gone (Score:2)
dothepose
dothepose's picture
Joined: 12/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3686

The way recruiting has gone this year and last year, I can see football winning a national title sooner. This team is being built like Alabama and is going to be loaded with NFL prospects. Call me crazy, I think with a senior Devin Gardner we are playing for a national title, I think teams win it when you least expect it. If they don't that year, by Shanes Sophmore they will be serious contenders and his Junior year they should be an unstoppable force.

You know, Dude, I myself dabbled in pacifism once. Not in 'Nam of course.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 3:58 PM | I understand the sentiment (Score:1)
tasnyder01
Joined: 10/11/2010
MGoPoints: 678

But our football recruiting is NOT better than our basketball recruiting, at least in 2012.  We got two 5*s in football, out of 20+ players.  In basketball (once rivals re-ranks) we'll have 2 5*s out of 3, with the 3rd player being top-100.

We had a really good football class, but our basketball class is even better. 

And everyone keeps on saying that the tourney is too hard to win.  I think it's harder to go perfect in football than it is to go perfect in the tourney.  And yes, I believe that you have to have an undefeated season (unless SEC) to go to the MNC game.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:27 AM | Good Hypo (Score:1)
UMFan1780
Joined: 03/22/2011
MGoPoints: 37

I would think that football would be the obvious answer after an 11-2, BCS game winning season, but a football season is too difficult to navigate without an off-day.  Everyone that is a Michigan critic likes to point out that even Bo never had a national championship (although it did not seem to stop him from becoming a legend, but that is a different post).

That being said, I think basketball, and for one reason - the one and done rule.  I have a feeling that the class we are getting next year will stay for at least two years.  I just think McGary will stay beyond one year to develop his game against talent that won't discourage him on a nightly basis (on a rhetorical note, how many early draft candidates took years - if ever - to develop in the NBA because of the talent discrepancy?).  As a result, in two years, it is possible to have a lineup of Morgan, THJ (although it might be asking a lot to get 4 years out of him), McGary, Robinson, Stauskas, Smotrycz, Brundidge and/or Burke.  That is a solid line-up top-to-bottom that is not entirely 3-point reliant.  That is just the type of experience line-up to beat the one-and-done laden teams that seem to make deep tournament runs only to lose when matched up against comparable teams with more experience.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:28 AM | After the Northwestern game (Score:1)
ForeverBlue
ForeverBlue's picture
Joined: 12/05/2010
MGoPoints: 146

After the Northwestern game yesterday, they showed a stat saying this was Michigan's longest Big Ten winning streak since 2006. We are on a 4 game Big Ten winning streak. Winning six straight required for a national championship? A lot needs to go your way. Beilein has us in a great position to be in a favorable spot in the tournament, but winning it will always be a huge challenge. I think football comes first, but both are in a great position going forward.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 4:00 PM | odds (Score:1)
tasnyder01
Joined: 10/11/2010
MGoPoints: 678

I think we're likely to win 4 more big ten games in a row, (3 if you don't include the tourney).

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:29 AM | Football, because Hoke poops (Score:1)
RowoneEndzone
RowoneEndzone's picture
Joined: 09/27/2008
MGoPoints: 2582

Football, because Hoke poops magic.  If Beilein pooped Magic it would be basketball but this is not the case.  Football will be in 2016 or 2017.

"Wasn't that Michigan drive just great.  That's like Patton riding into Berlin." ~Bob Ufer

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 1:20 PM | Hoke Poop (Score:1)
BrokenRhino
BrokenRhino's picture
Joined: 10/01/2011
MGoPoints: 73

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:32 AM | I'll go with (Score:1)
MichiganMan2424
Joined: 03/09/2011
MGoPoints: 586

I'll go with Beilen, mainly because I think we could next year. We lose Novak and Douglass, which is huge mainly with the intangibles, but we have two potential 5 star talents coming in. The roster we have next year will Beilen's most talented at Michigan, and I defintely think it should be talented enough to make a run to the NC.

Practice makes perfect. Unless you're the Buckeyes. Then you have to cheat.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:34 AM | Football, in 2015 (Score:2)
Wolverine 73
Joined: 08/03/2009
MGoPoints: 377

After the 2012 and 2013 recruiting classes are up to college speed, and Morris is in his second year playing, and we have a favorable home schedule--that's our best shot.  We'll have a dominant defense by then, the key to winning it all (as we saw in 1997), plus a dominant OL. 

wolverine 73

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:37 AM | Footbaw (Score:2)
mgordoblue
mgordoblue's picture
Joined: 12/02/2011
MGoPoints: 116

Hoke and Meyer are quickly separating themselves from the rest of the Big Ten pack. I think the odds are better when Michigan is one of the two dominant programs in your conference. Belein certainly looks like he is making Michigan a major player in the Big Ten, but there are too many good basketball programs for a NC to seem more likely  

My username is spelled "mgordoblue", but it's pronounced "Throat Warbler Mangrove".

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 11:58 AM | Div 1 football - 120 (Score:2)
unWavering
unWavering's picture
Joined: 01/13/2011
MGoPoints: 1404

Div 1 football - 120 teams

Div 1 basketball > 300 teams

This isn't a totally scientific way of looking at it, but naturally more teams to compete with means that it is inherently harder to win the NC in basketball.  Factor that in with a requirement of winning 5 games in a row at the end of the year, and I think Hoke has a much better chance at winning an NC than Beilein

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:01 PM | Very good point.   (Score:1)
RowoneEndzone
RowoneEndzone's picture
Joined: 09/27/2008
MGoPoints: 2582

Very good point.  

"Wasn't that Michigan drive just great.  That's like Patton riding into Berlin." ~Bob Ufer

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:29 PM | Football in 2012 (Score:2 Normal)
Dailysportseditor
Dailysportseditor's picture
Joined: 01/14/2012
MGoPoints: 124

We beat a rebuilding Alabama defense, scrape out a win vs. ND, only lose to an undefeated OSU in the Big Ten, then clobber someone in the Championship game. We are 12-1 with a win over SEC champ Alabama and get to the BCS Championship game vs. undefeated USC. DENARD goes crazy in his final game as all the hype has Barkley and USC crushing us. We win the NC!

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 12:25 PM | Football (Score:1)
Trobdcso
Trobdcso's picture
Joined: 08/20/2010
MGoPoints: 83

One game playoff.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 1:14 PM | Hockey then basketball then (Score:1)
Stephen Hawking
Stephen Hawking's picture
Joined: 10/23/2010
MGoPoints: 330

Hockey then basketball then football.

But maybe it'll be all 3!

Someone told me that each equation I included in the book would halve the sales.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 1:26 PM | I pick Basketball (Score:3 Normal)
R Kelly
R Kelly's picture
Joined: 03/03/2009
MGoPoints: 818

There is so much more margin for error in basketball.  I think the fact that the Big 10 is such a tough basketball conference is a little off base.  That only matters to the extent that you need to get into the tournament, but its not like you have to win your conference, or even come particularly close to get in, and once you are in, all bets are off.  Look at UCONN last year, they were .500 in conference play.  Whereas in football a Big 10 team is almost always going to need to be undefeated to get a spot in the title game.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 1:53 PM | Yeah, I don't get what the Big Ten season has to do with it (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 32052

In basketball. You don't win a National Championship by going undefeated in the conference. 

I'd say football, because we seem to be recruiting at a base where we'll be up there year in and year out.  The conference doesn't seem to be getting tougher, so I can see a lot of years where the game between Michigan and OSU (and then the wrench in the plan...the B10 title game) Could leave at least a 1 loss team looking for a spot in the game.

Basketball recruiting is getting to that level if can continue to come close to what we're doing next year, but with the early exits it's harder to have a talent base EVERY year that gives you a shot (If Burke leaves this year, what shot do we have next? If McGary goes after next year, do we really have a 2014 shot?).  Very few programs can reload with NBA type players coming in to replace those guys who leave early. Your Kentucky, Duke types.  So you're cutting out a lot of years of opportunity for a program like Michigan....maybe half as many shots, optimistically.

Now if you were going to ask me what's going to happen first, going to the National Championship game or going to the Final Four, I might bet on basketball.  Because the Tourney style does let a lot of underdogs get there...but really, it's been awhile since a true Cinderella won it.

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 2:41 PM |  I don't think we're national (Score:1)
althegreat23
althegreat23's picture
Joined: 05/30/2011
MGoPoints: 1011

 I don't think we're national title contenders in basketball this year. The BCS national title is played in January next year & the Final Four is in April, therefore I'll say football.

"A Michigan Man will coach a Michigan Team"

  • Login or register to post comments
February 22nd, 2012 at 5:57 PM | I dont know about this (Score:1)
MGoSoftball
MGoSoftball's picture
Joined: 10/18/2010
MGoPoints: 2780

but I would bet that of all the Varsity Sports: Softball wins the next NC.

From the Red Cedar Message Board:  "God hates us."  Yes He does Lil Bro, yes he does.  Everyone hates you.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.