Meta: What would you do if you won a chance to Mod for a day?

Submitted by Blue boy johnson on

It's a thankless, but necessary position,what could you accomplish in one  day of modding? Banning me is entirely ACCEPTABLE.

profitgoblue

October 18th, 2010 at 4:19 PM ^

I would ban all viewpoints that contradict my beliefs and/or ideas and all posts that I simply do not like and/or enjoy.  In other words, I would do the same thing the current moderators do . . . (I jest!)

formerlyanonymous

October 18th, 2010 at 5:09 PM ^

There's around 10-15 with powers. Only about 5-7 of us actively moderate, the others have left over power from guest posts or baby-sitting the site during one of Brian's vacations. Of those 5-7 active, I would guess Brian, Geaux, Tim, and myself are most active.

No set schedule. We just pop in and out at convenience. Peak times of year for me, I'm actively floating through every thread ~10 hours a day. I would say I spend closer to 3-4 sessions per day just running through things, maybe combined for over an hour per day on a normal week day. Post game Saturdays and Sundays, if I'm not working for the Texans, I tend to spend more time excising ad hominem or knee jerk reactions.

formerlyanonymous

October 19th, 2010 at 1:36 PM ^

Peak hours tend to be my own free time. It happened more when I was only taking 12 credit hours (classes only Monday and Wednesday 8a-2p). I spend close to 6-7 hours a day online and with google reader and twitter streamlining the process, I keep one monitor on mgoblog/reader/twitter, the other on ESPN360/TV. I am a content whore to an extreme.

During my "peak times," I'm on the internet/TV for 12-14 hours a day. Luckily, I'm working 2 jobs now as well as taking 16 hours to compensate for those past free times. I'm lucky to get 3-4 hours of content saturation. I've yet to even help out on CiL's for Michigan games, or even watch more than one volleyball game this season as a result.

And compensation, no. Baseball season nets me a little cash, but not enough to be taxed on. That's for content, not moderation, but that's fine with me.

mikefromaa

October 18th, 2010 at 4:28 PM ^

Lifetime Bans:

1. Grammar nazis

2. Posters who point out there was a related post 3 weeks ago, and you should have replied to it.

3. Posters who start a post complaining about dumb/unnecessary posts(really?  seriously?)

Additionally:

 Anything Brian commented on would get pinned to the top.

willywill9

October 18th, 2010 at 4:26 PM ^

I would change people's passwords, avatars and usernames... and really mess with people's minds.  I'd probably reverse the site so the mgoboard and diaries are on the left side.  I'd also reverse the color scheme, so maize is the predominant color.  I'd also translate everything into Spanish.  (All inadvertently.)

Yup, I'd pretty much ruin everything.

willywill9

October 18th, 2010 at 4:47 PM ^

  • # Delay: Create a random-length delay, giving the appearance of a slow connection. (by default this happens 40% of the time)
  • # White screen: Present the user with a white-screen. (by default this happens 10% of the time)
  • # Wrong page: Redirect to a random URL in a predefined list. (by default this happens 0% of the time)
I have a bone to pick with y'all!

umjgheitma

October 18th, 2010 at 4:32 PM ^

to delete their own thread. When news comes out, inevitably there's two to three people who post on the same topic, typically a Hello: Player X thread. I'd let the late guys to the party delete their post so they don't take up MGoBoard space with "Duplicate, Please Delete"

profitgoblue

October 18th, 2010 at 4:37 PM ^

I would institute an unchangable rule that would require Tom to respond to me immediately upon my posting a recruiting question, even if I don't put his name anywhere in the post.  I demand immediate answers and he should be monitoring the site 24/7 for any recruiting questions.