Meta: Increase Point Total for Board Topics?

Submitted by uniqenam on

Anyone else with me?  We've been having ridiculous posts from trolls, idiots, and people who like to say "that would be telling" in the past few weeks, and it's really taking away from the quality posts on the MGoBoard.

ChasingRabbits

September 30th, 2010 at 9:40 AM ^

As a low point guy, I would be more than willing to sacrifice my rights to start a thread for another couple months to clean up some of the garbage that has started to overwhelm the board. It has gotten pretty bad.

readyourguard

September 30th, 2010 at 9:40 AM ^

Free neg-bangs for everyone.

"All in agreement, say 'I'.  All those opposed, say 'goodbye'." <--that's a poster that hangs in my bosses office.  Just throwin that out there.

StephenRKass

September 30th, 2010 at 9:43 AM ^

The mods will delete a potentially offensive thread, even if on a topic related to the team. There are obv. disagreements on what is appropriate and what isn't. Some of my threads have been bumped or locked. (most recently, my interest in public statements from the team on spiritual topics, and how spirituality relates to the team. Too controversial, so vaporized.)

It really isn't about points (remember first rule of points:  don't talk about points.) Anyway, someone with a ton of points can post something that others don't like . . . having 1k plus points doesn't guarantee that a poster will always put something suitable up.

Also, the mods have deliberately chosen to allow certain personal and OT posts (for example, the dating adventures of CRex.) Having been to Korea and dated Korean girls, I find those posts hilarious. My only point here is that some personal and OT posts are deemed allowable by the mods. There isn't a rule that applies to everything. Other than Brian, that is . . .

One Mod to rule them all, One Mod to find them, One Mod to bring them all and in their compulsion bind them ... Lord Brian, the Wizard of all things Michigan
 

bouje

September 30th, 2010 at 9:43 AM ^

If you WANT to change the point requirements to 500 neg this post.
<br>
<br>If you don't want it changed to that pos this post.
<br>
<br>Please neg this post

InterWebZ-Troll

September 30th, 2010 at 10:56 AM ^

I am all in with the idea of at least 500 to post. I just lurk around and most of what I think is said at least 50 times a week. I just like getting my updates from reliable sources. You guys are awesome.

 

Go Blue

Plegerize

September 30th, 2010 at 11:49 AM ^

It's about time. And just for that I will neg my own post just to show I could care less about some measly point if it means I don't die a little everytime I come to this board and there's something useless posted.

GVBlue86

September 30th, 2010 at 9:44 AM ^

Cosigned... hopefully enough of these posts will get Brian's attention. Bump it to 500. This board used to be awesome. Now, not so much. Intelligence level decreasing rapidly.

jaggs

September 30th, 2010 at 9:46 AM ^

I think the idea that users could rank the thread via star ratings, and that would show up before you clicked it, it would help. Think porn sites that allow you to rate the vids either up vote or down vote (or on 5* scale) so you know going in that the post is say 92% upvoted. Once they fell below a certain threshold (arbitrarly 30% after min 20 votes) than the post would auto delete.

This, IMO, would sold a lot.

Seth

September 30th, 2010 at 9:47 AM ^

It's easy enough for all of us with a bazillion points to say "make a threshold" but I remember when I first went from lurker to poster, I did so with a Diary to pour out my tears of unfathomable sadness over the 2008 season.

CRex

September 30th, 2010 at 9:56 AM ^

I remember not being able to post for half of last season due to Henri and my low points count.  It was kind of frustrating but I stuck it out.  I'd definitely worry that a too high threshold would drive new blood away.  It would create a career niche for me though:

CRex's Korean Dating Service:

Date the girl, type the stories, get the MGoPoints. It's all about the points baby.

 

MEZman

September 30th, 2010 at 9:48 AM ^

It likely means that I wouldn't be able to post board topics (not that I have anything earth shattering to post currently anyway). But if it keeps the board clear of crap I'm all for it.

steelymax

September 30th, 2010 at 9:56 AM ^

We've been having ridiculous posts from trolls, idiots, and people who like to say "that would be telling" in the past few weeks

It's a symptom of the bandwagon.

Scotthany

September 30th, 2010 at 10:55 AM ^

a) You can still post in threads, and there are plenty to chose from so that your comments will find an appropriate home

b) You can amass points incredibly quickly if you use measured responses and a healthy dose of humor

c) If you have anything EARTHSHATTERING to share, just email Brian.  I'm sure he'll find a way to get it on the board and all shall hail you for your contribution.

BillyShears

September 30th, 2010 at 10:00 AM ^

Point totals really aren't the issue. Even if we raised it to 1000 to 2000, we'd still have Tater. I think the mods are doing a good job. No changes are needed. (Well, removing the -1 to -1 would be nice)

mikefromaa

September 30th, 2010 at 10:01 AM ^

The level of irony/hypocrisy in starting this topic cannot be ignored.  Which is dumber/a bigger waist of time, this topic or the ones it refers to?

Geaux_Blue

September 30th, 2010 at 10:03 AM ^

after thinking back, i believe this is already in the works as a temporary thing given the slow trickle of MSU trolls that will assuredly become a geyser whether they win or lose this weekend. sooooo... yah.

jabberwock

September 30th, 2010 at 10:06 AM ^

About raising point totals, but LOVE the idea that time-as member also is considered.
Plenty of people lurk without posting much, and they understand the MGoculture just fine.

We have more trolls now, and lazy newbies not bothering to read old posts etc.
Some of it is to be expected as this site grows in popularity, but it can be frustrating; this seems like an easy attempt to balance most concerns.

MMB 82

September 30th, 2010 at 10:24 AM ^

should not cost us points. And I agree with the 500 point minimum, but we should also consider adding a minimum amount of time since joining regardless of mgopoints, say 6 to 12 months? There may be people who follow the board for a long time and would know all the rules, but don't necessarily post often.

Shemmy126

September 30th, 2010 at 10:32 AM ^

There has certainly been an abundance of shit posted recently- however, as someone who has been around for over 20 months- i'd like to see the time a person has been here considered.  My point total is mimimal- don't post often, but read daily-  would like the ability to do so if inclined.  That said- support an increase for posting and removal of costing points to neg.

mgokev

September 30th, 2010 at 10:30 AM ^

Time as a member should be included.  Points are less important now seeing as a guy that can post a -_- face can amass 1000 points in 4 days.  Serenity now. Serenity now.

JeepinBen

September 30th, 2010 at 10:34 AM ^

I remember when Brian changed the system it was because there were like 5+ accounts (probably just 1 troll) but all he would do is log in to all 5 accounts and neg every post on a topic. When i saw it the first time I assumed that it was just a shitty thread, but really it was just trolling. 

The "Pay to play" negging has eliminated this kind of trolling, but yeah, people are too fond of their Mgopoints to actually neg. 

I hated that book

The Nicker

September 30th, 2010 at 12:55 PM ^

If I recall one of the reasons to charge for negbanging was the abuse of discretion. The downside is that people at a certain theshhold don't want to lose more points and so those in the know do not exercise their power. 500 point neg-ability theshhold, no penalties once you get there.

 

This is such a good idea I might start my own MGoBoard post about it.