Meta: A challenger appears!

Submitted by octal9 on
Tom Hammond, meet Donald Burleson: Not quite as nightmare-inducing, but yikes. Also, for reference:

maineandblue

February 9th, 2010 at 4:29 PM ^

Well, I suppose it can be considered on-topic since it's a running gag and almost a logo for the site, but still not sure how it would be considered "meta." Would love to hear you clarify that stance (seriously; not trying to be argumentative). Largely, I couldn't resist throwing a movie quote out there...

DeuceInTheDeuce

February 9th, 2010 at 6:26 PM ^

He's using "meta" in the epistemological sense. In this style of usage meta means something similar to "about itself or something closely related." As you can tell by that fuzzy definition there is plenty of wiggle room in what would be considered acceptable meta usage. Examples: Metacognition - thinking about thinking Metadata - Data compiled from other data Metablogging - Blogging about blogs The meta tag has become popular (among geeks!) for all site-related issues because people are essentially using the site to talk about the site. I'd argue this is exactly what the OP is doing; he's using the site to discuss a site meme.

maineandblue

February 9th, 2010 at 8:51 PM ^

Thanks for humoring me, Deuce. I'm familiar with the term, and I'm still left confused by how this is "meta." I would expect the new image offered by the OP to be somehow greater than or encompassing or describing/about the original image. Like a meme about a meme. Instead this seems to be an image similar to (rather than about) another image. That's what had me confused. Oh well, no big whoop.