"Meltdown Expected": Freep Wins "Journalism" Awards for Jihad

Submitted by MGoShoe on
Well don't this beat all. The Freep (print link) has won several 2009 Michigan AP Editorial Association first-place writing awards (large newspaper division) including:
• Michael Rosenberg, Mark Snyder, Jim Schaefer and Shawn Windsor for the sustained coverage of a single sports event for "Investigating Michigan football." • Michael Rosenberg and Mark Snyder in sports enterprise for "U-M football broke rules."
Commence [legitimate] meltdown in 3, 2, 1... [Edit 1: No need to click on the link -- I've done the dirty work so you don't have to. There's really no other relevant information available there unless you're interested in their awards for feature writing and covering Detroit corruption scandals.] [Edit 2: Pultizer Prizes were announced on 12 April, and no, the Freep did not receive one nor were they a nominee in any category. This is still a local meltdown, not a national one.]

Blazefire

April 12th, 2010 at 10:37 PM ^

Generally these awards are given based on estimated papers sold or something similar, rather than actual writing. Also, it can't be denied that they worked darn hard to twist and obscure the facts that much.

Geaux_Blue

April 12th, 2010 at 10:39 PM ^

I used to work for the organization. I was specifically in charge of how the contest is run specifically. I will tell you this: People are shipped in from out of state to, in about half a day, read every available piece submitted and make a judgment. People literally go table to table peering over their glasses and say "ooo that one." There is absolutely ZERO careful analysis. People decide which panel they will be on (headlines, advertisement, sports, etc.) and then judge it. Believe me when I say ONE person can determine if something wins based upon word of mouth, talking about it, placing it on top of the stack, etc. I have seen some of the worst college pieces win awards because they simply were on top and not thrust aside. This piece had the biggest headlines, most national attention and heaviest repeat discussion. It was the one piece people recognized when they got to the table. This is why it won.

Dark Blue

April 12th, 2010 at 10:41 PM ^

Who gives a shit? They can write all the bullshit stories they want, sell all the bullshit papers they want, and win all of the bullshit awards they want. They have lost a whole boatload of would be readers, and are a sinking ship. Fuck The Freep.

M-Dog

April 12th, 2010 at 10:43 PM ^

Editors circling the wagons to protect their own. The news media wonders why it has lost peoples' trust. Too many axes to grind, too many fiefdoms to protect. Seems like the only story they really care about is the decline of their own print and broadcast media. They're all over that story. What makes that story so especially compelling is that their's is the only industry in human history that has faced existential challenges from shifts in technology.

Blazefire

April 12th, 2010 at 10:46 PM ^

"What makes that story so especially compelling is that theirs is the only industry in human history that has faced existential challenges from shifts in technology." It's true. We should all feel really bad for them, because no other industry has ever had to overcome and adapt to the introduction of massive, sweeping technological changes. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go ready my plow for the morning, because in the afternoon, I'm using my crosscut and adz to cut and shape some new timbers for my hovel.

Blazefire

April 13th, 2010 at 11:02 AM ^

As farming techniques improved, farmers had to change their purpose from sustinence farming to supplier farming. As manufacturing technology improved, workers had to shift from artisans to mass production masters. These are radical paradigm shifts. The conversion from daily content release to constant content release and the change from subscriber revenue to ad, donation, and marketed brand revenue (MGoStore) is just another case of business adaptability. For one of the first well known times, its striking the educated rather than the blue collar force, but none the less.

Blue Balls

April 12th, 2010 at 11:30 PM ^

should be the response by players and coaches to any question asked by a reporter representing the Freep during the media sessions. I also would suggest answering a question with a question which is also fun-followed by the "no comment".

Tim Waymen

April 12th, 2010 at 11:35 PM ^

Thus is the state of journalism today, I guess. Fuck the Freep and fuck the AP for honoring their unethical practices. I really hope that the Freep is forced to close ASAP.

Bryan

April 12th, 2010 at 11:44 PM ^

By reporting the AP means: Dolphin Puncher: "Hey player x (but do not report that it is a former player) did you practice all day on Sunday?" Player X: "Yea, we were there like all day, man" Dolphin Puncher: "So, Player Y, would say that RR hates rainbows, butterflies and children?" Player Y: "umm...I just arrived here on campus a few weeks ago..." Dolphin Puncher: "I will take that as a yes" When are the Pulitzers awarded?

cadmus2166

April 12th, 2010 at 11:44 PM ^

I guess the National Enquirer will be getting TONS of journalistic awards, based on the Freep award. Now if only those aliens would come and abduct Drew Sharp and never bring him back.

Tater

April 13th, 2010 at 1:30 AM ^

Apparently, journalists are now rewarded for creating news instead of reporting it. What sucks the most is that in the minds of Rosenpuke and Shyster, it will justify their hatchet jobs. It's OK, though; life is long and karma is patient.

MGoAndy

April 13th, 2010 at 1:48 AM ^

I need the creepy .gif where Rosenberg appears from left to insert itself into this thread now. Because I love that thing.

Geaux_Blue

April 13th, 2010 at 2:43 AM ^

this is an ASSOCIATION of AP-member EDITORIAL groups. this is NOT the AP. this is a collection of newspapers who are part of the Associated Press who collectively JUDGE who they THINK is the winner. i'm about 90% sure the AP does not stand by these decisions as an institution. that seems to be missed with all these 'fuck the AP' comments.

Six Zero

April 13th, 2010 at 8:02 AM ^

Revelations 6:12 I saw when he opened the sixth seal, and there was a great earthquake. The sun became black as sackcloth made of hair, and the whole moon became as blood. And the Freep was awarded for its poor excuse of journalism, and all the righteous wept for the end was truly nigh. Hey, I'm not making it up. It's in there.

ijohnb

April 13th, 2010 at 8:18 AM ^

Freep representative: "Ok player X, what about practice, what is that like?" Player X: "Man, we practice hard. I cannot believe the dedication required at this level of football." Freep representative: "Hmm, would you say you practice a lot?" Player X: "Absolutely, more than I expected." Take it to print!!!!! {As can be ascertained from the statements of this nameless, faceless, possible member of a University of Michigan football team, Rich Rodriguez and staff are regularly and ceremonially abusing student athletes until there is nothing left of them} And the award goes to...... Give me f#%king break.

blueloosh

April 13th, 2010 at 9:53 AM ^

The Freep is the only noteworthy Michigan newspaper. This was their most noteworthy 2009 sports story. What other story - (1) about sports, (2) by a large Michigan newspaper, (3) from 2009 - can you even name, let alone suggest for winning the award instead?

SysMark

April 13th, 2010 at 10:51 AM ^

I guess what we can say is that is was a skillful hatchet job - that is what they are good at. Still a couple of sleazebags. The news outlets like it because it gives them something to talk about so why not a few awards. Everyone likes to take shots at the big guy - Michigan in this case. This will all end when the winning starts this fall and the air goes out of this "story".