Mattison on the Defense

Submitted by Double-D on
This is a good read from W247. I sure hope Pipkens can return to where he was heading when he got hurt. Too bad he can't get a redshirt because of number of games he played. He was just breaking out. How do you qualify for a medical redshirt? We have so much depth but need him to be a game changer. http://michigan.247sports.com/Article/Greg-Mattison-Talks-Michigan-Defe…

Marley Nowell

July 2nd, 2014 at 4:10 PM ^

What has happened with Dymonte Thomas? His first spring he was all set to be the nickel back ninja. And now we haven't heard a word of him playing safety or any other position.

SECcashnassadvantage

July 2nd, 2014 at 4:12 PM ^

The press conference; Well uhm we need to do a better job of coaching the kids. Rinse and repeat for 4 years. I hope getting some experience on the field helps Hoke. I pray he can get 1 ounce of toughness out of the team.

GoBLUinTX

July 2nd, 2014 at 5:54 PM ^

but if the player himself doesn't exhibit that burning desire and inner intangibles, no manner of coaching will make him better than the competition.  

You can either accept this as a self-evident truth, or you can continue to live the bitter life of others not always living up to your high expectations.

Wolfman

July 6th, 2014 at 3:43 AM ^

reading your post twice just to make sure I understood what you were saying, I realized just how many don't understand this simple premise. As one who coached this wonderful game for a number of years I can attest to the truth of your statement. Many fans, and on a percentage basis, probably more parents, feel that a highly gifted player will win matchups against lesser skilled players based on that one fact alone. But the truth is as you state. Thankfully most  that choose to play the game do so because they simply love the game. I've also had some fantastic athletes that were persuaded to try the game and after realizing initial success could become almost routine developed that same desire for the game.  And one being too many, for a coach anyway, I've also experienced watching some of the most gifted athletes I had ever seen completely void of those intangibles you mention that with even a modicum of interest in using their truly rare gifts could have become exceptional players but chose, for reasons that most cannot comprehend, to merely get by on talent. No manner of coaching, as you suggested, even making them aware of the benefits they could realize that the majority of their teammates would only ever be able to dream of could not motivate them. Sadly at the h.s. level, more often at the smaller schools their talent and willingness to show up for practice, go through drills,etc., would earn them a starting job over someone possessing all the intangibles but about half the athletic ability.  When you begin talking the highler levels of the game, it's just as you state. That talent alone might get them a spot on special teams. We read too often during the recruiting process how work ethic is a question, even for those offered by major programs. In the majority of these cases, that question rarely is answered other than the way you would imagine.

nowicki2005

July 2nd, 2014 at 9:40 PM ^

our defense has a lot of promise this year with players who have flashed their potential. We supposedly have great defensive coaches in Mattison and Hoke coaching the DL himself. You can't say we lack talent. It all hinges on the word "promise." A lot of our players have promise. MSU has became what they have became because of development. Hoke now has his guys with a lot of guys, albeit young, getting a lot of experience last year. Now they have to develop. I am very interested to see our development. I feel like we haven't seen it as much as we would like. if we don't see the development in the players, especially the DL and linebackers, that is strictly on Hoke and Mattison. This season will tell you if they are the men to lead this team.

MChem83

July 2nd, 2014 at 9:59 PM ^

We've got enough guys who classify as "good", "decent", "solid" or something to that effect, but not enough guys who are real difference makers.  It's time for all of the 4 and 5 star recruits to start getting it done on the field at the level they should.  if the coaches can't start developing real stars out of some of their players, then you have to wonder if they can really get it done here.

funkywolve

July 3rd, 2014 at 12:29 AM ^

Most teams have some youth.  The UM defense is going to have a lot of experience this year.  Guys who will be seeing significant action for the 3rd year in a row - Taylor, Ryan, Bolden, Morgan, Countess (not in a row but has started 2 years), Beyer and Clark. 

Guys who are going to be in their 3rd year in the program and have seen a good amount of playing time already - Glasgow, Wilson, Ross, Henry, Pipkins, Ojemudia, and Wormley

Maize and Blue…

July 2nd, 2014 at 9:46 PM ^

If you go back and watch the 1997 Defensive line, you see guys that were not all pro players, but who really got after it and hustled on every play to get to the quarterback, players like William Carr, Josh Williams, Glen Steele, and James Hall, who was a solid pro for many years. You could see the passion they played with and did not have to worry about giving the Q.B. too much time because you knew they were going to get to the quarterback, they melted an O-line like heat melts butter. It has been a long time since I have seen a Michigan team work that hard, and be that good at getting to the Q.B. same coaches - different results

This years line needs to play with the same sense of urgency that the 97 line played with, and the coaches need to be as tough and coach these kids with the same fire and agression they used with R.R.'s kids when they came in. Then you will see a great defense again.

Don

July 2nd, 2014 at 10:51 PM ^

William Carr was not on the '97 team; he graduated after the '96 season.

Josh Williams played six seasons with the Colts from 2000-2005, when they went a cumulative 64-32 and made the playoffs every season except '01.

Glen Steele was an All-American in '97, and played six seasons with the Bengals, and retired due to back problems.

Rob Renes was NT in '97, and he was All-American in '99.

As you mentioned, James Hall had a long NFL career, playing 12 seasons for the Lions and the St. Louis Rams.

Charles Woodson justifiably was the star of that '97 defense, but the fact is that the defensive line was tremendously talented in its own right, and any DB who's being honest will tell you that a standout DL makes his job significantly easier.

While the spotlight in 2014 is going to be on our offense, I think the key to our season will be our defense, and the key to our defense will be the DL. If we can put consistent pressure on QBs up the middle in key situations, it will be a huge help to our DEs and our back seven, including a certain heralded freshman from New Jersey.

Wolfman

July 3rd, 2014 at 1:56 AM ^

We've got some real space eaters in there and Jake has always had the ability to slip blockers. He should be even more effective on the inside, a position I think that was made for him. He just has a knack for dissecting a play almost immediately and finding the path of least resistance to the ball. When he was on the outside, his lack of tremendous speed limited him somewhat when he wasn't simply moving forward and he was known to miss some tackles in space. This should not be a problem for him in the middle with help from both sides and, according to Mattison, a big leap forward from our starting DL.  I liked Greg his first time here and I believe his many stops, including the pros, of course, has only made him better.  He's one of the few coaches I believe that stays away from what the fans want to hear and gives a clear picture of where he truly he believes we are.  However an improvement of our defense, a very good thing going forward clearly is not an indication of how we stack up against the conference's best and where we are in regard to stopping high powered offenses, or as was the case last season, some down right shitty ones. I will say though that normally when Greg fields a defense with this much depth along with the unknowns of one very good freshman, Mone, and one outstanding one, number 5, I'm confident that if the offense can do their job we should be fairly happy.

Magnus

July 3rd, 2014 at 9:31 AM ^

I agree with this. I've always thought Ryan projected more as a MIKE linebacker, although I think he can be solid in a number of places - MIKE, SAM, WDE, etc. Some of his most exciting plays have been when the coaches bumped him inside and sent him on blitzes. It would be nice to clone him and have him play all three linebacker spots (or at least two of them), but that's not legal.

MChem83

July 2nd, 2014 at 9:54 PM ^

At the very least it should be good, and better than last year, having lost no one of great significance.  We have depth and experience everywhere, and there are no cringe-inducing holes in the starting lineup, or even any places where a single injury would take us from OK to Oh, shit.  You could wish for more to bank on at S and DT, it's true, but even at those positions, we're not relying on walk-ons, true freshmen or unheralded recruits to fill important roles.

How high our ceiling is will depend first and foremost on whether any real impact players emerge on the Dline, and whether we can generate a capable pass rush.  If we can, this defense will be very good, if not excellent.  

GoBLUinTX

July 2nd, 2014 at 11:58 PM ^

That big Mamba Jamba Bryan Mone, is the DL now deep enough that he'll sport a red shirt and play next year?  Or is he just too good and big not to start his career in 2014?

Don

July 3rd, 2014 at 9:40 AM ^

during which Mattison apparently stated to Sam that secondary coverage is going to be much tighter, even if it results in more interference penalties. (Yes, I guess there is also the assertion that the overall defensive approach will be more aggressive. Now drink...)

The interview is behind the Scout.com paywall.