Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 2 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 2 weeks ago
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - March 2008: Pryor isn't coming, Boren has left, and some academic fraud allegations sprinkled in
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 215 comments
  • The Ballad of Jordan Poole
    k.o.k.Law - 176 comments
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 91 comments
  • PreSpring Football updates from Sam Webb
    AZBlue - 90 comments
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 61 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Final 2018 Basketball COMPOSITE Rankings
    4 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    34 replies
  • Auston Robertson arrested again
    54 replies
  • Michigan announces single-game ticket prices for 2018 football season
    34 replies
  • 2018-19 Michigan Basketball B1G slate announced
    42 replies
  • Final 247 Basketball rankings published
    43 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    75 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    89 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    53 replies
  • Angelique on Patterson Transfer
    54 replies
  • CBS Sports: Shea Patterson details scope of Ole Miss deception in lengthy letter to Michigan
    39 replies
  • OT: NFL Schedule Release
    12 replies
  • OT: Gregg Popovich's wife Erin dead at 67
    23 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    236 replies
  • Q&A with FB Ben VanSumeren--Video
    10 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Final 2018 Basketball COMPOSITE Rankings
    4 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    34 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    53 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    75 replies
  • Auston Robertson arrested again
    54 replies
  • Michigan announces single-game ticket prices for 2018 football season
    34 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    89 replies
  • Q&A with FB Ben VanSumeren--Video
    10 replies
  • Final 247 Basketball rankings published
    43 replies
  • 2018-19 Michigan Basketball B1G slate announced
    42 replies
  • CBS Sports: Shea Patterson details scope of Ole Miss deception in lengthy letter to Michigan
    39 replies
  • Angelique on Patterson Transfer
    54 replies
  • OT: Gregg Popovich's wife Erin dead at 67
    23 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    236 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    167 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Why should we be optimistic about 2018 M football?
    273 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    236 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • How Many Football Games Will Michigan Win This Year? (Poll)
    167 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    167 replies
  • Buckle Up
    159 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Scouting the Enemy: Ohio State QBs are Good
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • Urban Meyer throws more shade at Michigan
    141 replies
  • Wagner to NBA
    141 replies
  • FB new Nutrition plan under Herbert is well received by players
    132 replies
  • Today’s MSU outrage Apparently Engler has attempted to bypass the victims attorneys
    130 replies
  • What past season would you have liked to see an Amazon-style documentary on?
    121 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Mattison and defense at the game

100 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
December 1st, 2013 at 1:48 PM
#1
caliblue
Joined: 11/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1528
Mattison and defense at the game

The most surprising thing about THE GAME yesterday was the complete reversal of what I and probably most of us assumed would be the story if we were in the game, that is we expected the defense to hold OSU while a sputtering offense scored just enough points to make it a game. But, of course we got a defense that could not stop Miller or Hyde, and an offense that matched OSU score for score. What happened to our defense ( keep it in mind I am not at all critical of Mattison ) ? I am hoping  for the usual thoughtful and honest analysis we get here on a regular basis.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • football
  • Mattison

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 1st, 2013 at 1:51 PM
#2
umichsims24
Joined: 05/13/2010
MGoPoints: 86
Ummm...

They played one of the most explosive offenses in the nation. Let's be real.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 1:55 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
caliblue
Joined: 11/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1528
Not

being unreal, just would like to know where our weaknesses were. The blog members here could likely have some great analyses.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:52 PM
(Reply to #7) #4
Leonhall
Leonhall's picture
Joined: 06/14/2012
MGoPoints: 13840
personally

I was really scratching my head at those who thought our defense would slow down Ohio. Mattison hasn't been able to do it for the past 3 years. I shouldn't blame Mattison, we just don't have the horses up front to stop them. Our D-line is undersized/ineffective up front at stopping the run. Couple that with Braxton Miller is probably the best running qb in a long time, we were going to be in trouble. That being said, we did force some turnovers. However the biggest influence for us going for the win at the end was Ohio did whatever they wanted to  all day. I think the depth is coming, we just need that NT that gets the automatic double team, we don't have it yet.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:11 PM
(Reply to #42) #5
enlightenedbum
enlightenedbum's picture
Joined: 06/06/2009
MGoPoints: 19822
We did OK last year in

We did OK last year in Columbus.  Wasn't fantastic, but holding them under 400 yards and to two TDs when our offense couldn't do shit all day and turned it over 4 times is fine.  We just need the talent + experience, which is getting there.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 11:29 AM
(Reply to #42) #6
Wool Vereen
Wool Vereen's picture
Joined: 03/18/2012
MGoPoints: 208
Last Year

Well, last year was actually a pretty good defensive effortn mainly in the second half.  Miller only had 57 yds rushing total, and they only scored 6 points in the 2nd half.  Offensively, we score one touchdown in the 2nd half, we win that game

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:56 PM
(Reply to #7) #7
enlightenedbum
enlightenedbum's picture
Joined: 06/06/2009
MGoPoints: 19822
The simplest answer is 4

The simplest answer is 4 senior offensive linemen + Miller + Hyde vs. a youthful front 7 that hasn't been tested like that before this year and was missing some key parts.  And not enough speed in the secondary to feel safe playing the safeties at the line/cover the constraint plays (or just flat bombs) that Meyer runs.

I'm not 100% that Mattison really understands how to stop spread offenses, but I'm not sure that game is a great indicator for us to look at.  Their offense really is terrifying.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:40 PM
(Reply to #45) #8
alum96
alum96's picture
Joined: 04/28/2012
MGoPoints: 63601
When does "youthful" front 7

When does "youthful" front 7 excuse go away?  Let me know what year?

I count Black, Washington, Ash (who played quite a bit yesterday), Beyer, Ryan, Morgan, Clark.  That is 7 players in a rotation of about 11-12.  Will people stop calling it young front 7 when it is all seniors?  Because no team in the nation has a 2 deep of all seniors and juniors.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 4:10 PM
(Reply to #61) #9
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
We are partly youthful, but

We are partly youthful, but we are also partly just not very good. It's a talent deficit, not a coaching deficit. Morgan is not an elite athlete, Ash probably should have been a SDE instead of bulking up, Washington is limited athletically, Beyer has played three different positions this year, Black has gone from WDE to 3-tech to NT, etc. It's a group that's been in flux.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 10:44 PM
(Reply to #69) #10
alum96
alum96's picture
Joined: 04/28/2012
MGoPoints: 63601
"We are partly youthful, but

"We are partly youthful, but we are also partly just not very good." 

I agree - I don't think many UM fans see the reality though.  All I see is the "youth" meme.   They think it is all about youth when the evidence says no.   It is also troubling when Taco Charlon is bigger than guys 2-3 years older than him, as is Ben Gedeon.   We lack elite size and/or athleticism at these positions in the front 7.  Maybe it is coming in Wormley, Charlton, Pipkins, Henry, Gedeon, Winovich, et al.  Ross 15 lbs heavier would be another but he might not have the frame to do it. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 11:30 PM
(Reply to #88) #11
Blue Mike
Blue Mike's picture
Joined: 12/12/2012
MGoPoints: 2338
I think the youthful thing is

I think the youthful thing is less about who is playing, and more about where the talent is.  Of the guys you listed, probably only Ryan and Clark are out there because of talent.  I think, at least to some degree, the rest of those guys are playing a ton because the more talented guys, and the guys that fit what Mattison wants to do, are young.  

I think that if Mattison went with his guys, you'd see just how young the defense is.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:27 PM
(Reply to #7) #12
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 7931
Pipkins, Ross, Wilson out

On of the other LBs playing hurt the last few weeks. JMFR cannot be 100% yet - especially speed-wise. Most of that showed in OSUs run game, and then there was poor Furman back there all by himself.

Wonder if they are having a pass defense catharsis over at 11 warriors.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:04 PM
(Reply to #2) #13
Gitback
Gitback's picture
Joined: 04/12/2011
MGoPoints: 1637
Aaaaand

Right away the first comment is dickish. Look, either give some analysis or don't post.



To me, we just aren't experienced enough up front to deal with that pounding style. This is the game we missed Pee Wee the most. Needed that depth and size. Had to cheat in to deal with that, made us vulnerable to Miller taking off when he had space at the tackles.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 9:44 AM
(Reply to #2) #14
saveferris
saveferris's picture
Joined: 07/02/2009
MGoPoints: 15685
Without their starting WLB

Without their starting WLB (Ross), backup WLB (Jenkins-Stone), and starting FS (Wilson).  Guys like Gedeon did a decent job in relief, but having guys like Furman and Avery in there hurt.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 3:38 PM
(Reply to #93) #15
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
Jenkins-Stone has been almost

Jenkins-Stone has been almost exclusively a special teams player this year. The four rotation guys at ILB have been Ross, Morgan, Bolden, and Gedeon.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 1:59 PM
#16
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56282
I was not surprised.  We gave

I was not surprised.  We gave up 47 a month ago to Indiana, after all, and got run over by Iowa a week ago.  The D has never been all that great at stopping either the run or the pass this season.  The pass rush has been minimal, the DL has struggled to get a push up front, and the DBs have struggled to stay with their men in deep coverage.   Not a recipe to stop the OSU offense.

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 1:53 PM
#17
WolverineInCbus
WolverineInCbus's picture
Joined: 11/26/2012
MGoPoints: 3478
Predictable

I think their ability to to run was pretty predictable. We struggle bringing down bigger backs like Weisman and Hyde. I obviously wouldn't have predicted giving up 400 yards rushing but gotta give osu's offense credit. They are pretty lethal when they get Hyde rollin

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 1:55 PM
#18
MEGATRON HE16MAN
MEGATRON HE16MAN's picture
Joined: 07/19/2012
MGoPoints: 73
I thought

Playing Avery & Furman was a big mistake. They suck. Also missed Ross

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:02 PM
(Reply to #6) #19
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56282
Who did you want to play

Who did you want to play instead?  Wilson was injured.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:07 PM
(Reply to #12) #20
cbs650
Joined: 02/07/2011
MGoPoints: 3234
Thomas has to be better than Furman if not then we

Thomas has to be better than Furman if not then we are screwed back there. And I know he's a freshman but so was Wilson last year and he got time which prepared him for this season.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 5:25 PM
(Reply to #18) #21
snarling wolverine
snarling wolverine's picture
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 42991
Thomas has to be better than

Thomas has to be better than Furman if not then we are screwed back there.

I think it's option B.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:08 PM
(Reply to #12) #22
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
Marcus Ray and Tommy

Marcus Ray and Tommy Hendricks. Gosh darn Mattison kept them on the bench!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:14 PM
(Reply to #19) #23
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 52761
I didn't even see them on the

I didn't even see them on the dress list. Maybe they're redshirting.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:05 PM
(Reply to #6) #24
Leonhall
Leonhall's picture
Joined: 06/14/2012
MGoPoints: 13840
agree

although I thought Ben Gedeon did okay. I guess at this point Furman is a better option than Dymonte, (hopefully that changes soon). OSU picked on Furman all day long. In regards to Hyde, he is a train, no question, in the end though, I think #5 makes him who he is.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 1:57 PM
#25
uofmfan_13
Joined: 01/27/2011
MGoPoints: 650
I just don't understand why no 7-8 man box?

And why wouldn't we basically have Jake Ryan shadowing Hyde?  Realize he isn't a middle LB but I would think he could try and shadow him, on one side. 

In some ways, it is more embarrassing to get dominated like this on the ground.  A passing attack over the top of our D might have scored the points too - but it also might have left Miller injured!  Instead, we seemed to play a soft zone, and 6 man fronts and this became a dominant effort by OSU. 

I remember one 4-play drive they literally scored in 1:16 - on 4 runs!  LOL.  Embarrassing.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:05 PM
(Reply to #8) #26
gustave ferbert
Joined: 06/21/2011
MGoPoints: 20161
because they beat us over the top with long passes

like the bomb that tied the score at 7-7

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 1:57 PM
#27
HAIL-YEA
HAIL-YEA's picture
Joined: 07/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6456
I

thought the biggest thing was their tackles dominated us.  I think we should have been blitzing Ryan off the edge every dam play, he was the only one that disrupted anything in the backfield.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:03 PM
(Reply to #9) #28
cbs650
Joined: 02/07/2011
MGoPoints: 3234
Their tackles held our ends all game.

Their tackles held our ends all game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:37 PM
(Reply to #14) #29
umchicago
umchicago's picture
Joined: 02/05/2009
MGoPoints: 16153
true

i really don't think BIG refs call holding anymore unless you literally tackle someone.  osu actually did this once and the ref reluctantly threw a flag.  however, they did call a BS holding on norfleets long return.  go figure it was the ref standing near Urbs.  probably the same ref that threw the 15 yarder on clark too.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 4:49 PM
(Reply to #36) #30
cbs650
Joined: 02/07/2011
MGoPoints: 3234
the BIG Ten had to protect the conferences only

the BIG Ten had to protect the conferences only chance to NCG.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:57 PM
(Reply to #14) #31
Leonhall
Leonhall's picture
Joined: 06/14/2012
MGoPoints: 13840
true

i thought the officiating was TERRIBLE, for both teams. The lack of holding calls was embarrassing. their tackles held quite a bit.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 1:59 PM
#32
uofmfan_13
Joined: 01/27/2011
MGoPoints: 650
Let's refrain from "they suck" talk

Avery sealed our win 2 years ago with INT.  He is a solid nickel corner playing our of position.  Furman hasn't seen much time at all and looked lost.  Is that his fault or coaching?  Maybe both.  I don't think these guys "suck" at all.

I do think the inability / unwillingness to play 7-8 in box or throw some run blitzes hurt.  And I am not sure but I think Jenkins-Stone getting ejected hurt too - though I hadn't heard him in game prior?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:08 PM
(Reply to #10) #33
nowicki2005
nowicki2005's picture
Joined: 06/28/2011
MGoPoints: 811
This was a

terrible post. Avery, we have much better options than him. Just because he is a senior and had an interception a couple years ago doesn't mean anything. He is out of position a lot of times, takes poor angles, and even when he is in position he gets out of position because of lack of speed. He does nothing well. 

And how does losing RJS hurt us? We lost a special teamer compared to a starting guard for Ohio and another player who is a key offensive contributor. RJS probably will never start while at Michigan. He isn't even on our 2 deep and it isn't too far fetched to think he never will be. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:20 PM
(Reply to #20) #34
uofmfan_13
Joined: 01/27/2011
MGoPoints: 650
Avery was playing out of position

I am not defending Avery's overall performance as a safety - but in 2011 he WAS a decent nickel corner who came up big in key situations.  Doesn't that count for something?  Maybe as a safety he is out of position, and not physically suited to play it - but then who makes the decision to throw him out there?  Um, coaches?  Why is a 5-10 corner our best option at back-up safety?  What the heck is going on there?  Why do we always seem to have questions about safety depth?

I am not sure if losing RJS hurt us - hence my "?".  Because the announcers said it would hurt us - which didn't seem right - so I was checking.  We were out what, 2 LBs though right?  So it could have conceivably hurt us had we lost another in the game due to injury.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:01 PM
#35
JT4104
JT4104's picture
Joined: 10/25/2008
MGoPoints: 6542
Were just not good enough in

Were just not good enough in the middle of the DL. Pipkins was a massive loss this season and QWASH hasn't seemed to be healthy all year long.

Next year as much as I hate using that word should be better, while young hopefully the younger Redshirted guys like Poggi/Hurst can put on some weight to help in the middle.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:03 PM
#36
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39894
The defense clearly has a ways to go.

Frankly, the most disappointing aspect of this year have been the respective lines. Both need to make huge strides for their to be drastic improvement in 2014. I think Hoke and co understand that which is why I believe a huge emphasis will be placed upon improving the offensive and defensive lines.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:06 PM
#37
TNWolverine
TNWolverine's picture
Joined: 10/26/2010
MGoPoints: 5047
It would've been nice to have

It would've been nice to have Peewee all year and in this game as well.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:09 PM
#38
Romeo50
Joined: 03/09/2013
MGoPoints: 124
I felt the same way going in and had the same surprise!

I said earlier in the year that we should play two DT and not a NT and a 3T against the power teams and am not sure how much we used that against OHIO. With Pipkins out I wanted Henry and Washington all game with Black and Wormley used more as ends for contain. Thought i saw more typical 3T used and their larger experienced line manhandled smaller UM DL players all game. I guess you could say pick your poison as the pass was contained and Meyer would have done more spread passing if we did use a stouter line to load up on the run. I thought people say make Miller beat you with his arm so a lot of blitzing with lane discipline ala MSU approach may have worked if tried and we had the right people doing it. Borges may have saved his job and likely did but Special teams were a disappointment again and still. How does the rest of the B10 seem to have better than average kickers and UM struggles..I hope to see more ST focus and teaching and a QB coach under Borges at least for better results. Hart can replace Fred Jackson if he retires also. Hecklinski safe and a lhelluva recruiting coordinator.Poor tackling was again evident yesterday and stark compared to OHIO tackling. How good the LB coach (Smith) is versus Manning I question. Maybe red Deer antler spray like the other teams use is the answer?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:17 PM
(Reply to #21) #39
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39894
Ohio’s defense was horrendous. How you can praise a defense

that gave up 600 yards of offense I do not know.  Their tackling was  not all that good so I don't know what you are talking about. It appears to me that both defenses need a lot of work.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:11 PM
#40
evenyoubrutus
evenyoubrutus's picture
Joined: 11/04/2008
MGoPoints: -15
Most of our

Most of our starters/upperclassmen on defense are not the same level of athlete that they were facing.  Also OSU's offensive line is better (way better) than any we have faced this year, and our d-line is still young.  They dominated the line of scrimmage.  I actually was surprised how few opportunities our secondary gave them to make plays in the passing game.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:43 PM
(Reply to #22) #41
alum96
alum96's picture
Joined: 04/28/2012
MGoPoints: 63601
"Most of our

"Most of our starters/upperclassmen on defense are not the same level of athlete that they were facing."

It sure seemed that way - it seemed like men vs boys at some level.  In fact Gedeon who was a freshman seemed to be bigger than most of our upperclassmen which either says a lot about Gedeon or a lot about the other players on the team.   Morgan seemed to get run over constantly. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:12 PM
#42
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
Well, Pipkins was out and so

Well, Pipkins was out and so were James Ross and Jarrod Wilson. We started a freshman (Gedeon) at WILL, and their running back was bigger than our inside linebackers. We were down to playing a third-string nose tackle (Richard Ash). And a lot of our talent is very young.

There are lots of reasons. I'm not really sure why anyone would have expected Michigan to stop their offense. They have pretty good players everywhere. Heck, my prediction was one of the most optimistic ones I saw, and it said that Ohio State was going to score 31. They ended up scoring 7 fewer points than their season average, so that's not a bad day for our defense.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:15 PM
#43
nowicki2005
nowicki2005's picture
Joined: 06/28/2011
MGoPoints: 811
Our DL needs to get bigger and more athletic

Our defensive ends, I don't think any of them scare anyone as a pass rushing threat. Our tackles are either small, Black, or young, Henry, or injured, Washington. We still have yet to get that recruit that is a DE that will give us 6 or 7 sacks in a year. Wormley and Beyer are not those kinds of guys, Hand would have been that guy.....

I think Henry will be great next year as he improves his leverage and gets stronger. Hopefully Pipkins is back and healthy as he can be a space eater. 

 

Mone will be a huge key to the difference in a couple years as I believe he will eat up two blockers. I don't know what impact he could have next year as DL is typically a very tough position for Freshman and DTs tend to develop a lot slower.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:18 PM
(Reply to #25) #44
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39894
Whormley is a freshman coming off a serious injury.

He has shown flashes. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:23 PM
(Reply to #25) #45
cbs650
Joined: 02/07/2011
MGoPoints: 3234
Taco can be that kind of end and I believe Wormley

Taco can be that kind of end and I believe Wormley has the ability to do so. If u watched Wormley yesterday, he was getting held constantly which means he was winning his one his match up.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:20 PM
(Reply to #25) #46
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo's picture
Joined: 11/01/2012
MGoPoints: 9547
This offseason will tell us a lot

1. DT needs more power to hold the POA.
2. dEs need more explosiveness to generate pressure.
3.ILBs need more size (Ross might be 220 lbs, Bolden is just over 220 and Morgan is 228) although true frosh Gedeon is already 236.
4. Safeties need more lean mass to tackle effectively.

Lots of youth and large frames to mold. S&C program must step up if we're going to play "big boy" football.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:46 PM
(Reply to #57) #47
alum96
alum96's picture
Joined: 04/28/2012
MGoPoints: 63601
"S&C program must step up if

"S&C program must step up if we're going to play "big boy" football."

 

Agree.  A lot of guys seem about 10 lb underweight on the defense - either they don't have the frames to hold the weight or something is amiss in the S&C.  I am not talking about the underclassmen but the older guys.  I am hoping it is a case it is mostly body frame as a guy like Charlton is already as big as most of our older ends...Gedeon bigger than our older LBs.

I love your point #1 thru #3 but I think that is the blueprint for every defense in America ,save for apparently Rich Rods.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 7:18 PM
(Reply to #66) #48
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo's picture
Joined: 11/01/2012
MGoPoints: 9547
Familiar blueprint indeed

If we want a shutdown D that's the recipe. We have supposedly recruited the potential to play elite D with this blueprint, but the payoff isn't evident.

This year we just don't look or play like a physically strong team. Hoke wants a big, mauling squad so hopefully it's just youth and our S&C is effective this offseason but I don't see encouraging signs yet.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:16 PM
#49
West Texas Blue
West Texas Blue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1843
Michigan's defensive rankings

Michigan's defensive rankings having been misleading these past few years. Are we greatly improved from Rich Rod years? Yes. But I think our D ranking are inflated due to below average Big Ten offenses. Put this team in Big 12 or PAC 12 and we'd be shredded weekly.



Secondary play has been downright mediocre and the D passing stats are greatly helped by crappy QB play in Big Ten. This defense has a long way to go to be elite.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:18 PM
(Reply to #26) #50
nowicki2005
nowicki2005's picture
Joined: 06/28/2011
MGoPoints: 811
Whats funny is that GERG has

Whats funny is that GERG has ironically did a pretty good job with Texas' defense after they were terrible to start the year. Go figure...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:20 PM
(Reply to #28) #51
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39894
Texas had a good defense a few years ago. They are talent laden.

It speaks to how poorly they were coached that a team with so much defensive talent could be so bad.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:22 PM
(Reply to #26) #52
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39894
Yep.Michigan’s defense needs to make some serious strides.*

cc

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:24 PM
(Reply to #26) #53
uofmfan_13
Joined: 01/27/2011
MGoPoints: 650
I tend to agree

For all the "youth youth youth" talk - we stll don't seem to have a ton of depth at key positions.  It is still light years ahead of the Rich Rod teams though.  Remember having a converted WR playing at CB??  LOL.

On the DL - I understand they want to sub-in fresh bodies every few plays, which is good, but why is Heitzman playing so regularly?  It just seems like certain guys play and play and play because they are consistently... unspectacular. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:35 PM
#54
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo's picture
Joined: 11/01/2012
MGoPoints: 9547
OSU has an experienced and

talented O that plays power football. We're very thin at DT, so the loss of Pipkins and QWash at less than 100% seriously limits our run D.

Hopefully Pipkins return plus another yr of growth for young guys like Wormley, Hurst, Poggi, Henry, Heitzman will yield a more stout Dline.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:42 PM
#55
I dumped the Dope
Joined: 09/22/2013
MGoPoints: 2326
DL

I think the absence of a 0T nose tackle who can command a double team a lot of the time is a key ingredient to successful defense...because then its like having an extra player out there more or less.

I think we all underestimate the Mike Martin effect and what he was able to do.  There are no stats for grinders like this but they literally tip the balance of the team over center.

While we're on DL, I like to see M get an actual position coach for DL to replace J. Montgomery to allow Hoke to be freed up to go address other shortcomings.  Obviously that's Hoke's call...being the captain of the ship...but it makes a lot of sense to me.

I'd like to see our linebackers add more beef, and I think they will get there, no doubt.  Michigan has subsisted on quality LBs for a long time, and that gives us the ability to stop these bigger backs like Hyde and Weisman (LeVeon Bell, etc) as they are going to be here in this conference going forward.  Have to be excited about a bigger guy like Furbush as I think he will fit right in with the proper development.

I loved the way Ray Taylor played the majority of this year.  Seems like teams 'picked' on him a lot more due to Countess on the opposite side, and I kept saying, you can only pick on #6 so many times...then he intercepts.  It appeared his run support was dialed up a lot higher for the ohio game, which was great to see.

I think M purposefully played some softer pass D this year due to younger players, especially in the DB ranks.  I think that could be tightened up at any moment, per Mattison's commands.  I think it makes sense given what we were working with in  terms of youth.  But you see the potential for when the front 7 are studs and you have stud corners too (witness MSU).  The safeties can then cheat up near the line for additional run support on obvious running downs, and be available for blitzes on passing downs.

Braxton Miller is really tough to defend, just because of his foot speed.  Its like Denard except played back the other way.  Send the receivers deep, spread out the D, Miller can juke anyone playing the line of scrimmage, then the WRs just block.  Unless there's someone playing "Spy" who is actually faster its a difficult proposition.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 4:57 PM
(Reply to #38) #56
cbs650
Joined: 02/07/2011
MGoPoints: 3234
Roy Manning replaced Montgomery but he's coaching

Roy Manning replaced Montgomery but he's coaching outside linebackers. And Montgomery wasnt really the DL coach he shared duties with both Mattison and Hoke.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 11:45 PM
(Reply to #75) #57
snarling wolverine
snarling wolverine's picture
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 42991
And if we hire a DL coach,

And if we hire a DL coach, some other position group loses its coach, because of the NCAA limit of assistants.  It's pretty common for the HC to take over a position group, actually.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:49 PM
#58
gwkrlghl
gwkrlghl's picture
Joined: 04/13/2012
MGoPoints: 71
Not too surprising

D-line has been a weak point all year and we were down probably 1.5 linebackers. They spread us out and when the D-line got unsurprisingly busted open, there was a lot of room to run. I imagine the best way to stop that team is to be able to hold the LOS and play man with your back 4 or 5. OSU was just murdering us to the tune of 8 ypc.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:49 PM
#59
GoBlueRandy
Joined: 06/13/2010
MGoPoints: 4954
Just my observation from the

Just my observation from the game. I had the opportunity to sit somewhat close to the fid and the thing that stood out to me was how small our DL was. OSUs offensive line dwarfed us.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 5:39 PM
(Reply to #40) #60
Alumnus93
Joined: 09/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5781
Finally someone sees the same

Finally someone sees the same thing. Our DL is small. Guys like Ojemudia and Beyer and so on, are simply undersized. The OL looks the part but boy does the DL look small.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:54 PM
#61
hennesbe
hennesbe's picture
Joined: 09/11/2011
MGoPoints: 415
Defense

What defense by either team?

It's difficult to play defense anymore at any level.  They allow way to much holding, shoving and pushing.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 2:56 PM
#62
klctlc
klctlc's picture
Joined: 09/02/2009
MGoPoints: 1957
observation

On the final touchdown, I think. It was scheme also.  Our DT were overmatched. If you watch the replays we have two inside guys against 4 OL and a FB, we had no chance, they called the right play. That was just one example, but they spread the line out pretty well, it would have been very hard to pack it in.  Need two dominant dt, to eat up double teams, only chance.  Lets see how we do next year against OSU and MSU, their offensive lines are gonna be young and inexperienced. We should have 4 legit inside guys if Mone can adjust early.  If we regress, we have real problems.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:00 PM
#63
Blarvey
Blarvey's picture
Joined: 11/21/2011
MGoPoints: 2384
That was one of the best OLs

That was one of the best OLs in the B1G and Hyde had a lot of yac because he is huge. I am pretty sure I saw Ryan and Gedeon spying Miller at times but that would have also been where Ross could be a huge asset (not to take anything away from the guys that played).

In terms of scheme, I agree with stacking the box or at least playing closer to the line but you still run the risk of a big play if they get to the second level. Power spread teams are hard to defend when they have a good OL but they basically dominated the LOS and overpowered Michigan all game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:01 PM
#64
IBleedMaize_Blue
IBleedMaize_Blue's picture
Joined: 04/13/2011
MGoPoints: 412
Agree with a lot of people on

Agree with a lot of people on here. From what I saw our d-line just got pushed around and once Hyde gets moving he's a load to bring down. Can't really blame our LB's but Hyde was getting hit 2 yards past the line of scrimmage and dragging guys for another 5 yards all day. The dude is good. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:01 PM
#65
michiganman01
Joined: 08/27/2013
MGoPoints: 896
Blaring issue since 2001

UM defenses cant stop the spread offense. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:15 PM
(Reply to #50) #66
reshp1
reshp1's picture
Joined: 10/31/2011
MGoPoints: 25119
Michigan's defensive issues

Michigan's defensive issues yesterday had nothing to do with spread. Hyde YAC'ed his way into 2nd and short all day and when we cheated to stop him, we got balls thrown over our safeties. The read option burned us once or twice, but the way Ohio got us is a lot more like a Stanford style offense than a true spread and shred outfit.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:25 PM
(Reply to #56) #67
klctlc
klctlc's picture
Joined: 09/02/2009
MGoPoints: 1957
Agree 100%.  With the added

Agree 100%.  With the added element of speed, b. miller.  Not making excuses. If M could have stopped the run with it's base D, whole new ball game.  Just can't do that right now.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:04 PM
#68
alum96
alum96's picture
Joined: 04/28/2012
MGoPoints: 63601
A very good defense will take

A very good defense will take away 1 weapon from a team like OSU - Hyde or Miller.  Make them 1 dimesnional. We are not good enough to do that.  Not close it seems.   You saw what Stanford did to Oregon.  You saw what Ok state did to Baylor.  We are not at the level of those teams on defense.

Having a special teams player start at safety did not help, nor did loss of Ross although Gedeon played great for a freshman.  We contiue to lack playmakers outside of Countess and Jake Ryan.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:12 PM
#69
reshp1
reshp1's picture
Joined: 10/31/2011
MGoPoints: 25119
With all guys healthy (Ross,

With all guys healthy (Ross, Pipkins, WIlson, etc) we had a chance, maybe. With all those guys out, we were going to get YAC'd to death and then thrown over the top of on occasion just like Ohio has been doing all year.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:12 PM
#70
DonAZ
DonAZ's picture
Joined: 12/05/2011
MGoPoints: 9478
Interior DL

As has been said by many above, OSU's running game was at the expense of our interior defensive line.  Hyde is a big back and has to be stopped by equally big guys at the line.  He gets to the second level and he's getting 5+ yards a carry easy.  It's tough to beat a team who can do that consistently.

Now for OSU's real tests:

  • Michigan State has the #1 rushing defense in the nation; the #9 rushing defense.
  • Florida State the #13 rushing defense; the #1 passing defense.

I think OSU beats MSU, but it'll be another game where OSU's weak links are exposed.

I think FSU torches OSU.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:15 PM
#71
An Angelo's Addict
An Angelo's Addict's picture
Joined: 07/12/2011
MGoPoints: 7314
I feel like we have gotten

I feel like we have gotten talented players that need to keep developing. Not sure if anyone else feels this way, but I feel like looking at our players compared to many other teams, our guys just "look" smaller. I understand we supposedly have a good strength staff but I always get this sense we are smaller and weaker looking than the other big boy programs

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:23 PM
#72
Coldwater
Joined: 12/14/2008
MGoPoints: 6974
It's talent

Or the lack of talent that hurts the defense. Small size, lack of any real speed guy pass rushers, and some recruiting misses have led to an average defense. They aren't even remotely close to elite.



Inside backers are just too small. Defensive tackles simply can't get off blocks. That's an indictment on Hoke since he coaches the interior line. And guys like Avery and Furman are not national championship caliber safeties. Guys like Wormley, Heitzman, and Mario O. really need to make that leap next year to show that they aren't just below average, non-playmaking dudes.



Michigan needs better defenders than what they have. They need NFL type guys. That's why getting Peppers was so huge, and losing Hand was so disappointing.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:35 PM
#73
BlueinLansing
BlueinLansing's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 16420
Simply

not big enough, or athletic enough up front.  Nor fast enough in the secondary.

 

We seem to have little options in safeties, reduced to playing a 4 year guy who barely played the first 3 years because he just wasn't that good.

 

We seem to have a team with lots of potentially good pieces that don't seem to fit together with many more missing pieces.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:36 PM
#74
Leonhall
Leonhall's picture
Joined: 06/14/2012
MGoPoints: 13840
overall

I think Ben Gedeon has a great chance to be a SERIOUS playmaker at LB. He has the size that we are seriously lacking right now, I think he's damn close to 240 now. Our front 7 will be a little better next season, hopefully Jake Ryan stays healthy and we get some help from the RS freshmen/freshmen on the d-line.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 5:32 PM
(Reply to #63) #75
Alumnus93
Joined: 09/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5781
By midseason Gedeon will be

By midseason Gedeon will be our best defender. He played quite well as a true freshman.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:37 PM
#76
Sllepy81
Joined: 01/02/2013
MGoPoints: 4262
its forgotten that

Osu had one of its best dous ever. excuses aside they will score on anyone if they're healthy.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:49 PM
#77
UMinSF
Joined: 04/06/2009
MGoPoints: 4161
Injuries were critical...but improvement is needed

With Ross in there, many 10-12 yard runs would probably have been limited to 5 or 6.  

Furman simply does not stay with/behind deep receivers.  Wilson would have limited those wide open deep balls.  Miller's inaccurate passes saved us from 2 more TDs.

Having PeeWee to help eat up space/linemen could have helped, but he's been out, and by now we should have some alternatives - every team has injuries.

IMO, having a blazing fast ball hawk in the secondary could make a huge difference, and another year of bulking up should help stiffen our line and linebackers.

OSU has a great line, Miller is an incredible athlete, and Hyde will be playing on Sundays.  Tough task to stop them - but we shouldn't get gashed so easily.

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 4:17 PM
(Reply to #67) #78
jblaze
jblaze's picture
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 14099
That's the talent differential. Period.

This is why we need guys like peppers and sadly, hand. OSU has these guys in droves, we are getting them next year. I love countess, but he's unlikely an NFL guy. Same with Ramon Taylor.



We just haven't seen this yet, because except for ND, nobody on our schedule has this kind of elite talent.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 4:25 PM
(Reply to #70) #79
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
I don't know why Countess

I don't know why Countess wouldn't be an NFL guy. He's a redshirt sophomore who has a bunch of tackles and 6 picks on the year, including a return TD. I don't think he'll be a first rounder, but I definitely think he's on track to get to the next level.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 5:30 PM
(Reply to #71) #80
BostonWolverine
BostonWolverine's picture
Joined: 11/13/2008
MGoPoints: 6556
Frankly, I don't know why

Frankly, I don't know why Taylor wouldn't be an "NFL" guy, either.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 1:21 PM
(Reply to #71) #81
pescadero
pescadero's picture
Joined: 03/28/2013
MGoPoints: 5991
He probably will be an NFL

He probably will be an NFL guy on special teams... but he's 5'8", 180lb corner who runs about a 4.5.

 

I just don't see him playing much DB in the NFL.

 

 

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 3:45 PM
(Reply to #96) #82
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
The roster lists him at

The roster lists him at 5'10", 182 lbs., which probably means he's 5'9", 182 lbs. I looked at the height of Pro Bowl cornerbacks a couple years ago, and 10% of Pro Bowl cornerbacks from 2001-2010 were listed at 5'9". Twenty-three percent were 5'10".

http://touchthebanner.blogspot.com/2010/11/whats-ideal-size-for-cornerback.html

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 7:10 PM
(Reply to #98) #83
pescadero
pescadero's picture
Joined: 03/28/2013
MGoPoints: 5991
I'd say more like 5'8",

I'd say more like 5'8", 170lbs at a guess. We'll see at the combine.

 

...and while a number of shorter corners have done well, I think you'll find most ran a tenth or two faster in the 40.

 

Countess is a great college corner - but he has NFL linebacker speed.

 

Aaron Glenn, Antoine Winfield, Cortland Finnegan, and Dre Bly, all of whom measured in at 5'9"

 

Aaron Glenn - 4.38

Antoine Winfield - 4.4

Cortland Finnegan - 4.32

Dre Bly (at 5'9 7/8) - 4.51

 

Bly is the only real comparable IMO.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 7:25 PM
(Reply to #99) #84
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
Denard Robinson was listed on

Denard Robinson was listed on Michigan's roster at 6'0", 197 lbs. He measured in at 5'10", 199 lbs. at the Combine.

Mike Martin was listed on Michigan's roster at 6'2", 304 lbs. He measured in at 6'1", 306 lbs.

David Molk was listed on Michigan's roster at 6'2", 286 lbs. He measured in at 6'1", 298 lbs.

Jonas Mouton was listed on Michigan's roster at 6'2", 240 lbs. He measured in at 6'1", 239 lbs.

I have a strong suspicion that Denard was listed at 6'0" because he was a quarterback, and any quarterback under 6'0" is automatically put under a certain amount of scrutiny. For the rest of the guys, it has seemed for a while that they are listed on rosters at approximately 1" taller than their Combine height and approximately the same weight.

Therefore, I sincerely doubt that Countess is 5'8", 170 lbs. If he gets invited to the Combine and/or measures in at the pro day with those measurements, I will be extremely surprised.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 3:56 PM
#85
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 81232
The Tumble...

The effect when it comes to seasonal averages is sort of intriguing - before the game on Saturday, we were the #16 rushing defense, allowing 116.4 yards per game on the ground on average. Right now, we fell 16 places to #32, with the average now being 139.4 yards per game.

Now, the numbers are tight, so it isn't as if there is a lot of separation between most places, but it is a significant hit in our FBS rushing defense ranking all the same. Interestingly, it only drops us in the conference rankings from 4th to 5th (7th best if adjusted to conference games only). 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 5:24 PM
#86
Avon Barksdale
Avon Barksdale's picture
Joined: 04/27/2013
MGoPoints: 10341
Nope.

Wasn't surprised one bit. I said in at least six threads everyone was severely overrating our defense.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 6:57 PM
#87
FormerlyBigBlue71
Joined: 02/20/2011
MGoPoints: 361
Its all about scheme.  The

Its all about scheme.  The best way to stop Ohio States offense is by playing 8 man boxes and playing tight press coverage on their wide recievers.  There is no other way.  We don't have the secondary capable of this yet.  Hopefully Mattison and Hoke realize this and are recruiting accordingly.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 7:59 PM
#88
ca_prophet
ca_prophet's picture
Joined: 09/07/2010
MGoPoints: 3147
I thought we would do better but

That was before no JRIII and too much Furman. Not a lot better, because we are undersized/under-talented on the line. Preseason previews said we had a solid back seven with the strength in the LB core, and the line just had to eat blockers to let the LBs slow down the run. When we met an O-line that could handle our front seven, we lost that strength. Not sure how much to read into it other than "Hyde and some lineman will be playing on Sundays" and "Get well soon Pipkins".

The one thing I question with regard to Mattison is why we started rotating safeties in the first place, but hindsight suggests that Wilson has had an injury for some time and playing through it is possible but performance-impacting. Couple that with Gordon's foot injury and here we are.

Hopefully Thomas is ready to step in next year - that punt block is still a fine introduction and I'm waiting to see the next chapter. Henry looks to be maturing nicely as well, which gives me hope the defense will improve.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 8:44 PM
#89
The Denarding
Joined: 11/29/2010
MGoPoints: 1010
The defense

I tend to agree with Magnus that it is both an experience and talent deficit.   I'm not sure if you play Henry and Washington you even get there.   If we run blitz up the middle they will stretch with Miller and if we blitz the edge they put Hyde up the middle.  The difference last year is we had two space eaters in the middle (Campbell and Washington and to be honest a much healthier Washington I think) and Jake Ryan was max level Jake Ryan and they just couldn't run Braxton stretch.  Hyde still got a lot of yards last year - we were just able to contain Miller much better and a large part of that was max Jake Ryan.  

In addition, those are some big boys in the same system for two years, and I mean most of the meat on the inside is senior level NFL caliber talent.  Moving a mis positioned Black and Washington with undersized linebackers on the second level is not that much of a surprise.

I think we respected Braxton Miller's arm a little too much.  He isn't going to throw seam routes and outside routes for him will also be a challenge.  But unless you can stop the inside running game, all else will fail.  I would have just run blitzed the middle and taken the risk at some point.   Does this open us up to play action and getting gouged on the edge?  Yes but at least you get to flow to the ball that way and can use players like Ryan to make tackles in space.  But honestly it seemed like a damned if you do, damned if you don't scenario.  There is no Kovacs back there, so guessing wrong (as evidenced by the game) has disasterous affects.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 1st, 2013 at 10:29 PM
#90
MonkeyMan
Joined: 10/13/2013
MGoPoints: 4545
Give MSU's DC a year with our

Give MSU's DC a year with our group and see how their "talent" and "experience" improves vastly. Other teams' defenses out perform us with much less. Recruiting 5 star athletes is not as important as recruiting teachable, eager kids and knowing what to tell them. I would swap fro MSU's DC today if I could.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 3:04 AM
(Reply to #87) #91
JimBobTressel
JimBobTressel's picture
Joined: 11/28/2010
MGoPoints: 4235
Lololololololololl MSU's

Lololololololololl MSU's defense is filled with SENIORS. narduzzi is putting this finished product on the field in year 7.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 8:18 AM
(Reply to #87) #92
UMgradMSUdad
UMgradMSUdad's picture
Joined: 07/02/2011
MGoPoints: 9515
4-5 years ago, the Spartan

4-5 years ago, the Spartan fans were demanding that Narduzzi be fired. Four years ago, they lost to schools like Central Michigan, who put up 29 points against them, and Minnesota, who put up 42 points against them.  At that time, defense was considerd their weak link. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 2nd, 2013 at 9:47 AM
#93
Muttley
Muttley's picture
Joined: 07/07/2009
MGoPoints: -74969
The OP forgot the question mark in the thread title

The title should read, "Mattison and defense at the game?"

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.