... to give Rodriguez the resources to hire his first choice as DC, for little more than what he was making at West Fucking Virginia.
is there such a thing as an etsy genuis? if so, this is it.
... to give Rodriguez the resources to hire his first choice as DC, for little more than what he was making at West Fucking Virginia.
Do you suppose that part of DB's charter was something along the lines of "fix this, do whatever it takes, but fix this".
I don't have a problem with your inability to let RR go, but questions like that don't do your efforts justice. I suspect that in hindsight, MSC and Martin may well have done things differently. It isn't a perfect world we live in, not even in Section 1. Where we have been plays a big role in where we are, and I rather like where we are.
This where I have a problem with this line of reasoning. HC's don't always get their first choice and it's up to them to have viable alternatives. This is why coaches network.
Plus it's not like Casteel was the only 3-3-5 DC around. About the same time Hoke hired Rocky Long for what I'm sure was not Michigan money and he is to the 3-3-5 as RR is to the spread.
Final point, how many DC's are willing to come in without being part of the decision for who his assistants will be?
It's over. That sh*t just didn't work out. Sure Rodriguez had a lot of underminers, and the administration didn't pony up for Casteel, but I don't think Mary Sue Coleman or Michael Rosenberg were the ones who hired Greg Robinson to run a defense he didn't understand, or hired inept position coaches like Tony Gibson. I'm pretty sure they weren't the one whose defensive recruiting classes included a vast list of busts and future transfers either. So let's just say there was blame to go around, and Rodriguez+Michigan just wasn't a very good fit, okay?
It probably could have been a better fit, if circumstances both endogenous and exogenous to the running of the football program had been more favorable, but they weren't, so it wasn't. I'll always be grateful to Rodriguez for finding and developing Denard, and for those amazing Notre Dame games in '09 and '10, but I think it's painfully obvious at this point that hiring him wasn't a great idea.
But hey...we've ended up in a good place. We have a good team, and the best recruiting classes we've had in god knows how long. We have good coaches on both sides of the ball, and we have good position coaches too. We have a head coach who may not be a "genius," but is obviously a lot smarter than he lets on, and is clearly a LOT more street smart than Rodriguez. And he can handle the underminers. All's well that ends well, if you ask me.
I think this should be a candidate for post of the year.
Is there any way to determine if this is the first use of the words "endogenous" and "exogenous" in a posting on mgoblog?
...i'd say probably not!
And how can I collect my fabulous prize?
There is something to that.
Tell it to President Coleman. I wasn't speaking in Flint, and I didn't bring up this topic. (Which is trending right now on the websites of Michigan's leading newspapers.)
This explains a lot. Where have you been since the war?
Don't you have your own blog for these thoughts? I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm personally very fine with not dragging this up once a month on Mgoblog.
You have a choice. You can leave, and not come back here. Fine with me.
This post is the poster child for bringing them back. The very fact that you aren't hidden away in darkest Bolivia is a testament to how broken the system is.
We want negbombs! We want them now!
We want negbombs! We want them now!
And you have a choice of posting this on your own blog. I'm trying to be civil here, but I really think the median Mgoblog reader would prefer to not drag this up all the time and just move on.
At the time, Coleman said, many were criticizing former coach Lloyd Carr's style as being too old fashioned, outdated next to the flashy, spread offense-style play gaining popularity.
We know, given the first couple of candidates who allegedly turned them down, that this wasn't the mindset going into the process.
I'm not sure how the specifics of Rodriguez' tenure are a surprise or a sin. He was the product of a bungled process and his years in Ann Arbor are just a reflection of Martin and Coleman's weakness. Rodriguez had his chance to emerge and take control but he too was wasn't up to the challenge, just like the people who hired him.
and perhaps had Coach Rod been given time he would have brought success to the program but THIS IS MICHIGAN. This isn't the place for a guy to learn on the job, this is a place for the right guy to take the helm and guide the greatest football program in the land on a course of further glory and greatness. I was on the Coach Rod bandwagon from day one, and I was disappointed he was let go, but now that time has passed it's easier to see that Coach Rod was not the right guy. He was a breath of fresh air, he brought some change, but he was not ready for this assignment.
For better or worse Coach Hoke is the new man. You need to ask yourself if you a Coach Rod Man or a Michigan Man?
I think we both know the answer to that...Go Blue.
I am only about 1000% more loyal to Brady Hoke, than a lot of Carr-era "Michigan Men" were to then-Coach Rodriguez.
Your definitely on crack if you believe that (and I don't think you do). He was terrible and the defensive turnaround was not a miracle. Rich Rod had good players and couldn't coach them. Period!
I'm not sure why everyone responds to any RR post with "We have a great team... Hoke is the coach now... enjoy the #1 recruiting class etc etc..."
Appreciating the talent and success we're currently experiencing, and debating the RR situation are not mutually exclusive. If you truly don't want to hear/talk about him, don't bother visiting the thread.
I appreciate these threads, because I still enjoy hearing any news that comes out of his time here, and the reaction and insight of those willing to share on the board. So please don't discourage these discussions, because I (along with may others I believe) still find the topic interesting.
I think there's a simple explanation: most here are tired of the topic. You and Section 1 may differ on that, but that's the consensus.
We'll never know the whole story, and frankly, this isn't one of those things where it's important to figure out the whole thing. As the monkey from the Lion King said, "It doesn't matter. It's in the past."
These threads always just have that feel of those Japanese WW2 soldiers who emerge from a Pacific Island jungle in full-out survival combat mode thinking the war is still going on.
The following is a message from the Michigan Man PD:
Dear Section 1,
We would like to inform you that it would not be very Michigan Man-like to ask these questions in public. Your Michigan Man membership would be suspended immediately pending action from the Elder Council of Michigan Men, and you would be facing the possibility of having your Michigan Man status revoked. Also, it would be in your best interest to move on from the past and let Mary Sue do her job. Go Blue!
Seriously, let it go.
Michigan Man Police Department
Were you guys on vacation in the fall of 2009? Is that part of your collective bargaining agreement? You get to take three years off using banked time?
The Michigan Man meme needs to die in a fire.
Given that the football program now appears to be in good shape, why do you want her to focus on made in the past? How is that relevant now?
Also, have you considered that Three and Out might not have told us the complete story? You bring up the book like it's been brought down from the heavens. John U. Bacon's made a journalistic career out of writing fluffy, feel-good pieces. Three and Out was originally intended to be such a piece about Rodriguez. Only gradually - as the Rodriguez years turned out to be much worse than expected - did the project change into an "exposé," the kind of book Bacon had never written before. And even then, he continued to allow Rodriguez to have the right to review anything before it was printed, which kind of defeated the whole purpose.
There is a big difference, however, between John U. Bacon and all of his antagonists. John is answering questions. John is willing to talk, to be challenged, to explain his work and his thinking.
Coleman; Brandon; Carr; Rosenberg; the Freep; not so much.
Which is why, on the occasion of Coleman actually answering such a question, I simply posed some additional questions for the subject that she opened up.
Of course Bacon is going to answer questions, he wants to encourage sales. Coleman, Carr et al are in a completely different place. I suspect that if the roles were reveresed, Bacon wouldn't be answering questions.
A subject that someone in the crowd at Flint opened up.
I hope that someone who was there, might see this thread and tell us what the exact question was, and what the other questions were.
And i remain a pretty big RR fan.
This topic came up based on one question from the crowd, and you weren't there, and now you are critiquing MSC's speaking style and gunning for her to answer questions the answers to which wouldn't satisfy you.
Of course it was a mistake. It was a desperation hire of an outsider. Martin had done shit in terms of securing a replacement for Carr. It seemed he just figured he'd grab Les Miles or something (a move MSC and Carr blocked). Whoever we hired was going to be a last minute desperation grab after a bunch of failures.
The Michigan fanbase was pissed after the boating incident, the striking out on a freaking Rutgers coach (in hindsight, thanks for not coming Schiano), etc. Hiring RR was a mistake in that it was a grab at someone who had a bit of a national name without any regard for if he'd actually fit in. He clearly didn't. Part of that is on the AD for not prepping him properly for the press conferences, part of that is on how RR himself acted (the manner in which he fired Carr's staff for example). Even if RR had gone 12-0, the hiring process itself still would have been a screwup and Martin would deserve criticism for how he conducted the search for Carr's replacement.
At the end of the day it isn't like we profited while RR suffered. The man was paid millions of dollars, we paid his buyout (instead of trying to use the sanctions or something as an excuse to fire him with cause), he did a year at CBS, and now he has a whole new BCS program to try again with.
Also your point about the salaries is just plain pointless. Martin was a cheap bastard with assistant salaries, he always was. It wasn't like Carr era assistants were raking in the money. When Brandon took power he may have realized we were paying below industry average, but he also had to realize the alumni base would go up in flames if we handed out raises to the first coaching staff to manage back to back losing seasons at Michigan since the 1950s. Actually for that matter aside from Mattison, we weren't paying Hoke's assistants that much (relative to say Alabama) until they won the Sugar Bowl and Brandon kicked out the bonuses and new contracts to retain the talent.
End of the day, the hring process was a mistake. RR himself also provided to be a mistake based on his ability to lead the program forward
Mary Sue Coleman is one of the brightest University presidents in the country. She predicted the economic downturn well in advance and put the University of Michigan in an almost unmatched position of preperation for it. To be honest, whatever cross you're bearing about the Rich Rod era, I would have been more than a little disgusted if you grilled her about the nuances of Three and Out and other Rich Rod conspiracy theories.
Rich Rod was a mistake because he failed. We're worse off than when he came, that's all that matters. Mary Sue Coleman has made the University of Michigan a better, stronger institution, and I'd like to think she has better things to do with her time than appease your Three and Out fueld indignation over Casteel (who, according to that book, stayed in West Virginia because that was hos home and because he was familiar with the new coach, not because he got a bad deal).
Rich Rod is gone. Let it go.
I think it is reaonably fair to compare President Coleman to David Brandon; they are under similar media microscopes; they have similar administrative pressures; they both have large personal fundraising burdens.
David Brandon would not have gotten caught in such a Gordon Gee-like answer, and more than anything, it is not just a matter of Brandon knowing what not to say and being more skilled with non-answers.
Because Brandon has said a lot of stuff that is more impolitic and at the same time smarter than President Coleman. First and foremost was Brandon's calling out the Free Press for specific criticism. That is what ya might call defending the University of Michigan. I see Coleman as basically spineless by comparison.
Anyone you ask on the subject would say that Mary Sue Coleman is a wonderful and fantastic President. I'm glad you can see through the brain washing and have formed our own opinion.
I'm learning a lot here. It's personally edifying to realize that I should just bypass any arguments people make about Coleman being a great president for the university as a whole in order to focus on what transpired with regard to a defensive coordinator from West Virginia who never had a job at Michigan. Thank god this board isn't some kind of fanboy circle jerk, or I'd still be stumbling in the dark.
I nominate this as post of the year. You have won all the internets.
Spineless? Spineless, really? Are you out of your mind? The woman who took the U all the way to the Supreme Court in defense of a policy the University valued? Who regularly stands up to legislators who want to see us change our benefits policies, police our faculty, review our course offerings, interfere in our admissions policies, control the kind of research we do? Who has stood up to our regents and our faculty on certain issues, even though that kind of dissent can make her job uncomfortable? Who speaks across the country on all kinds of higher Ed issues? You mean THAT spineless president?
Come on. You may not agree with her stance on issues, you may not like her leadership style, but spineless she isn't.
college presidents are generally out of their depth in AD and coaching hires. We got lucky with Don Canham/Bo.
Section 1 is a drain on this community. He is a ranting, raving loon who needs to see a therapist. I have no idea why he is allowed to continue taking regular shits on this community.
Let's back off the personal attacks, OK?
Calling a spade "a spade" is not a personal attack. I am of the belief that Section 1 legitimately needs to see a psychological professional. I also have no idea why the powers that be make us suffer his paranoid missives. People do not have a right to life, liberty, and messageboard. I'm not being hyperbolic: I cannot understand why he's tolerated.
It's a shame a post like this gets upvotes. And I don't agree with Section 1. There's a line between being thoroughly annoyed by Section 1's repeated arguments and being an a**hole.
This is over it.
Hiring RR was a huge mistake. Not becuase he is a bad person or bad coach because he is neither, but because he was a bad fit for the program both on and off the field.
Michigan demanded a "Michigan Man." And is ridicuous as that sentiment is, a large portion of the alumni, administration and fanbase were simply not ready to accept someone so different from that mythical ideal. Then the press pounced on that negative reaction and RR started losing and it was over almost before it started.
I try to maintain at least a thin veneer of civilization. I'm supposed to be a voice of calm and rationality around here. This board only operates when the discourse remains civil, and adding to a flamewar provides nothing of value. But while I can't remove the thread (it is relevant and timely), I nevertheless feel compelled to make the followin statement:
JESUS TAPDANCING CHRIST ON A GODDAMN BISCUIT LET THIS SHIT GO EVERYONE. AND I MEAN EVERYONE; MARY SUE, SECTION 1... EVERYONE. He doesn't coach here any more. Tyler went away. Tyler's gone. If I read ONE MORE GODDAMN DEBATE ABOUT "DERR HE WASN'T A MICHIGAN MAN" vs. "OMG IF HE JUST HAD OOOOOOOONE MORE CHANCE" I swear to God I'm going to burn this goddamn place to the ground.
I mean... Christ, man. JUST EVERYONE LET THIS SHIT GO.
How the fuck is this thread relevant or TIMELY?
They love this shit and are pissed about their maize and blue Rich Rod tattoos. Rich Rod had major support from national writers, local news, and ESPN so many (myself included) became immediate fans. Some idiots will never let him go. He lost that support when everyone realized he sucked. I was wrong about Rich Rod and admit he was simply a terrible coach. However I won't go write a book to cover up my poor choice of supporting him for too long.
University President addresses questions about Michigan Athletics = relevant
It happened yesterday = timely
I suppose by your definition if David Brandon broke wind at lunch today it would meet your criteria. Most people just wouldn't be dumb enough to post a thread about it.