BiSB

September 28th, 2011 at 8:28 PM ^

A terrible team without the guy who accounts for ~75% of their passing yards and ~50% of their rushing yards?

What is one step below DOOOOOOOOOOM?

rockydude

September 28th, 2011 at 8:56 PM ^

It may actually happen. I just saw on CBS sportsline rapid reports that Gray threw today but did not otherwise practice. If he can't play, it looks like a freshman will take his place.

Honestly, our guys probably have had practices tougher than that game would be. 

The Gophers just can't seem to buy a break this year . . . .

Raoul

September 28th, 2011 at 8:43 PM ^

Star Tribune article makes it sounds like Kill plans to coach on Saturday:

No, he's preparing to play Michigan in Ann Arbor this Saturday, and Kill said he will be 100 percent in charge, as always. "The rest of it, I've talked enough about it," he said, clearly impatient that his health has become the focus of the Gophers' season. His doctors "haven't got it all figured out yet, but hopefully they'll make progress on it, and we'll be fine."

TESOE

September 28th, 2011 at 10:49 PM ^

It's inspirational stuff.  You only go around once.  Seizures are not always easy to control regardless.   I respect a guy who doesn't give in to the uncontrolable forces that drive our lives.

Regardless of how this works out for him...I salute his charity work after his cancer diagnosis and his determination in the face of adversity.  From what I read...this guy is made of the stuff.

FreddieMercuryHayes

September 28th, 2011 at 9:24 PM ^

I really hate this logic.  It sounds exactly like OSU and MSU fans saying UM should just be happy with 8-9 and occasional 10 win seasons.  Minnesota has every right to strive for perfection like anyother school.  They do have the most B1G championships after UM and OSU.  If they are willing to endure rebuilding in an effort to reach the next level, then so be it.

jmblue

September 28th, 2011 at 10:14 PM ^

Minnesota is like Army: a program that was once a national power, but hasn't done anything at all for decades now.  With little recruiting base, and with neighboring Wisconsin and Iowa being strong, they've got a tough row to hoe.  They can strive for perfection, but it's not likely to happen.  Under Mason they were competitive.  That's all they can realistically ask for.  Mason beat Michigan in Ann Arbor, OSU in Columbus, and PSU in Happy Valley.  Very few coaches have pulled that off.

FreddieMercuryHayes

September 28th, 2011 at 10:24 PM ^

No team is like the service acadamies, because they are at an inherent disadvantage in today's competative college football in regards to recruiting and accepting student athletes.  Minnesota is no different than any other FBS school.  Boise St., TCU, UConn all have had recent success after they found the right coach.  Hell, even look at Wisconsin.  They were pretty subpar back in the days, had a few good seasons here and there, but when they got Barry Alverez, they were able to build themselves into a solid B1G program over the years.  I see no reason why Minn couldn't do the same if it finds the right coach who is willing to dedicate himself to the task long term.

jmblue

September 28th, 2011 at 10:39 PM ^

I agree that they can be a competitive team.  I don't agree that they can be a top-10 team, if that's what you're suggesting.  (For that matter, I certainly don't consider UConn an elite program, and I think TCU and Boise would have a tougher go of things if they were in the Big Ten.)

The very fact that Wisconsin is an established program makes it that much harder for them.  Minnesota is basically "Wisconsin State."  The two schools are linked by tuition reciprocity, so there's a long tradition of people from one state going to college at the other.  If one of the schools is strong, it almost ensures the other one won't be, because there isn't much of a recruiting base there.

FreddieMercuryHayes

September 28th, 2011 at 11:33 PM ^

I certainly don't think they will ever be a consistant top 10 team, but I believe that winning a B1G championship is possible.  Glenn Mason's best year of Minn was a 10 win season in 03 and he still only finished fourth in the Big Ten.  Otherwise the best was 8 wins (and yes, there were some victories over very good opponents), and he was a career at Minn just over .500.  I just completely understand if Minn doesn't want to resign themselves to finishing 4th in the B1G as the best they can do. 

Oh, and I put UConn not as an example of elite, but as an example of a team that had a coach that built a program from scratch into a conference champion.  Yes, only a Big East champion in a down year, but it's still pretty impressive.  Perhaps a better example would have been Kansas St. when Bill Snyder came to down and turned like the worst program in the coutry at the time into a legitamiate power.

Needs

September 28th, 2011 at 10:39 PM ^

Exactly. Mason had actually gotten Minnesota to a place where they could recruit 4 star running backs like Maroney (Barber III is a different case b/c he was a legacy) and good linemen (didn't they have a center on who won the Rimington?) From what I remember, they were competitive with Wisconsin and Iowa on a yearly basis, regularly making bowls, and pulling the occasional upset. One could argue that the rise of Wisconsin and Iowa in recent years and the utter collapse of Minnesota are at least tangentally related.

WolvinLA2

September 28th, 2011 at 8:49 PM ^

I'm sure the players are not letting their guard down and I'm sure the opinion of the board doesn't affect that. 

This is the opening game of the Big Ten season, it's at home, and these players want to go out and continue winning.  I'm sure they'd play hard no matter what.  Plus I'm sure the coaches will keep it fresh in their minds not to take Minny or anyone else lightly.

john22

September 28th, 2011 at 8:56 PM ^

back,i like to play teams when they are at full strength but shit happens. I was worried about gray because he is a big duel-threat QB,now you should be able to relax and not worry as much about this game.GO BLUE!!!

lunchboxthegoat

September 28th, 2011 at 9:25 PM ^

phew, thank goodness he's probably out. there's no one on the team we could afford to lose in a duel. What makes one a duel-threat quarterback? Like they can throw a fade with their right hand and draw with their left? Do they take seven paces shoot then throw? throw then shoot? what's the process here? Duels are hard enough and now we're adding quarterbacking to them? Hardcore.