Malzone gets 4th star from rivals

Submitted by Bo Knows on

The title says it all

 

This class will be small, but like the 2014 class has a chance to be sneaky good even without the presence of a top 5 guy like Peppers.

Eskimoan

May 21st, 2014 at 5:26 PM ^

This class can certainly be something special, especially with the potential of getting Harris back, and hopefully holding on to Crawford !!

In reply to by SECcashnassadvantage

Avon Barksdale

May 21st, 2014 at 6:33 PM ^

Michigan State is good against decent teams like Ohio State and Stanford. . Stanford was overrated a year ago. We all saw what happened when Michigan State's 11-1 three stars took on Alabama's 9-3 five stars. I believe the score was 49-7.

alum96

May 21st, 2014 at 7:00 PM ^

So?  at this point they are ahead of us.  I'd rather UM be in the 4 game playoff and go get blistered in the NC game like ND or as you perceive MSU.  Rather than sitting in 8th place... looking up at our top 2 rivals playing for BT championships. 

MSU de-panted UM last year and so would have "overrated" Stanford.  We could not even hang with mediocre KSU.  MSU outmauled a very physical Stanford team that dominated Oregon defensively.   Both those teams are built in a way Hoke wants, and instead we are playing patty cakes with UConn and Akron.  Also MSU went out west on California turf and beat a West Coast team, something UM stunk at even in its best years.  Give credit where it is due - three 11 win seasons in 4 years, we'd die for that.  They were a few stupid PI calls away from a NC game appearance.

Franz Schubert

May 21st, 2014 at 8:36 PM ^

As you say Stanford is a pretty physical team. No match for MSU physically. It was only after the NFL draft that I seriously considered the PED theory. With Bullough being suspended and the concerted effort by MSU and Bullough to keep the reason under wraps, perhaps the NFL people knew something? It's beyond belief that a conference championship and Rose Bowl champion team would have 1 player drafted. Even more so when you consider the physicality and dominance on defense. Isaiah Lewis, Denicos Allen, Bullough, Fowler, and Fonoti were all draftable.

alum96

May 21st, 2014 at 11:48 PM ^

Trae Waynes their 2 star CB and Calhoun their 3 star DE are both projected as 1st rounders in 2015 mock drafts IF they leave early.  In theory both could come back for 2 more years - that's serious (young) talent.  One of their safeties Drummond is getting talk as a late 1st or 2nd rounder.  So that is 3 players in the 1st 2 rounds who were not seniors along with Dennard with a 1st round pick this year.  So that is four players on that 2013 defense that are projected 1st/2nd rounders out of 11.  Marcus Rush doesnt have the NFL DE height but will probably be like Schofield, a 4th round type you take as a backup first/eventual starter role. 

They had a few guys who were "college stars" but not the protoypical NFL athleticism/height - hence why they were 3/4 stars out of HS not 5 stars.  Bullough and Allen from the LB crew off the top of my head.  Their one returning LB Taiwan Jones is a NFL body but doesnt have the same production as Allen or Bullough - on paper he goes 3rd round next year.  So with Rush and Jones that is 6 of the 11 starters being NFL picks inside the 4th round. With 3 others being "college guys but not NFL guys" - Bullough, Denicos Allen, Isaih Lewis.  That's every single player on their defense but the two DTs. And one of those DTs was a 6th year senior - so that helps a college defense playing guards who are 19-20 years olds.

But bigger picture outside of Bama and LSU and maybe a school or two outside of Florida I don't know many defenses that had 3 1st round draft choices on it - and potentially 4.  

 

Michigania

May 21st, 2014 at 6:40 PM ^

Well I am of the belief that Miles was only willing to come here as insurance in case he lost that big game and the LSU regents wanted him out. And the second time around I think he leveraged us to get a raise but with no true intention to coach here. So the botch as you say, may not have been the case.

gwkrlghl

May 22nd, 2014 at 6:31 AM ^

Highly ranked class? "Awesome. Greatest class ever"

Lower ranked class? "Sneaky good. Underrated. Off the radar."

Just like weight gains and losses, all recruiting classes are good too