Major D-1 University Is About To Be In Hot Water

Submitted by ChrisPerryCarry on

I know this is frowned upon but I read a really interesting thread on Rivals and wanted to hear what the board thinks. Apparently a major news source is about to publish a report about a major D-1 school that not many would expect. There are supposed to be names, dates and amounts. It was stated that it close to coming out, maybe before Summer. They have to get all of their facts straight before coming out with it. It's supposed to be a huge news story and sounds like it could absolutely devastate whichever school it is. A lot of people are speculating that it is PSU or ND. If I find anything else out I'll let you know. Let the speculation begin.

funkywolve

February 24th, 2011 at 4:49 PM ^

reading posts where people think it might be a southern school.  The OP states that it's about a school not many people would expect.  Do people really think southern schools don't cheat?  I don't think to many people would be surprised if an SEC school got nailed for cheating.

AnthonyThomas

February 24th, 2011 at 5:32 PM ^

Honestly, if this school is supposed to be a "surprise" then it isn't going to be anyone in the South (maybe Florida or Georgia), and it won't be OSU or probably even us, simply because there have been well published if not overblown violations in the last few years.

Notre Dame gets recruits because they're the Dallas Cowboys of college football. Everyone around the country wants to play for them and people will pick them to be good even when all evidence shows otherwise. I don't think you can look at their recruiting success and point to violations. It could be them but I don't think they're recruiting success would be the reason.

I think it's too early to make any real predictions outside of those.

mghorm

February 24th, 2011 at 5:20 PM ^

My first thought was Oregon. I think they realized the shit that USC was pulling and figured the only way to compete was to go with the crowd. They probablyy even picked up the tab on a couple of Usc transfers

Hannibal.

February 24th, 2011 at 5:30 PM ^

The most likely outcome is that the rumormongering is complete bullshit, kind of like the rumors last fall that Auburn was going to be kicked out of the SEC by the end of the season.

Hannibal.

February 24th, 2011 at 5:30 PM ^

The most likely outcome is that the rumormongering is complete bullshit, kind of like the rumors last fall that Auburn was going to be kicked out of the SEC by the end of the season.

baorao

February 24th, 2011 at 8:29 PM ^

a TigerDroppings (?) message board thread about someone who had connections that said the Cam Newton thing was being strung out because the FBI was investigating Bobby Lowder because he owns a bank that received bailout money. 

Allegedly that investigation uncovered (or would uncover) a plot to use his failed bank and his casino interests to launder payouts to Auburn recruits and players (such as "OMG I went to Lowder's casino and won $5,000. What luck!" ) . And with Lowder being an Auburn trustee and his past transgressions with boosterism Auburn was going to get destroyed by the NCAA and could potentially lose their accreditation (because the school's board members involvement proves a lack of integrity amongst the university's leadership).

Then the loss of accreditation would force them to be kicked out of the SEC.  But none of this could come out until the FBI had nailed Lowder on the bank/casino crimes.

In fact according to the TigerDroppings insider the only reason the Cam Newtown thing was on the FBI's radar was because it could corroborate things they learned about from wiretapping Lowder's business associates.

Here is a link that has that link

http://larrybrownsports.com/college-football/how-corrupt-auburn-is-and-how-they-laundered-money-to-players-cam-newton/39981

03 Blue 07

February 25th, 2011 at 1:58 AM ^

Just to play devil's advocate...it doesn't mean that a.) the FBI wasn't investigating Lowder, b.) they are not currently investigating Lowder, or c.) they investigated Lowder, the investigation uncovered dirt, but the AUSA's didn't decide to go forward with prosecution yet or are still deciding or didn't have evidence "beyond a reasonable doubt." One thing I'm sure of: the Justice Department hardly ever prosecutes someone unless it's what most attorneys would consider an open-and-shut case. I worked for a similar government enforcement agency during my 1L summer, and the pervasive attitude there (and even moreso at the Justice Dept, from what I've told) could be summed up in the words the director of my particular field office told me: "We're the government. We don't lose." (Although they do. . . but it's really rare, less than something like 1 percent of the time). My point in this rambling post is that I think it tends to make the DOJ less inclined to prosecute borderline cases, and they also have priorities of what they prosecute and politics play a role. There's too much unknown to just dismiss the stuff in that tigerdroppings board out-of-hand. . . or say it's true.

phork

February 24th, 2011 at 5:32 PM ^

Pics or it didn't happen..  Seriously, some anonymous poster has some information from a "source" who says a major d1 program is going to get boiled.  We know it happened, now we just have to get the facts straight?  Err. Yah.

Why would top recruits go to ND?  The same reason they would go to UM.

Caesar

February 24th, 2011 at 6:05 PM ^

If it's ND, and it's some sort of grading/cheating-related scandal, I can't say I'd be surprised.

Then again, Stand and Deliver was based on a true story.

DanRareEgg

February 24th, 2011 at 6:14 PM ^

As much as I hate ND, I don't think it's them.  They recruit so well regardless of performance because they're the biggest Catholic university in the country.  That alone gets you in with a lot of players and families.  Add the constant TV exposure and (now seemingly pre-) historic success and ND doesn't need to cheat to get good players.  List of major programs that would surprise me:

Northwestern

PSU

Stanford

Wisconsin

Iowa (though I have a funny feeling it might be them)

...and I guess Nebraska and Oklahoma

MGoRob

February 24th, 2011 at 9:56 PM ^

"ND doesn't need to cheat to get good players"

Except maybe for this little incident...

Following an investigation in 1999, the NCAA placed Notre Dame on two-years probation for extra benefits provided by a representative of the university to football players and one instance of academic fraud. The NCAA found that Holtz and members of his staff learned of the violations but failed to make appropriate inquiry or to take prompt action, finding Holtz's efforts "inadequate."  (straight from wikipedia)

Beavis

February 24th, 2011 at 6:16 PM ^

Yeah what about Clemson?  They're doing something dirty there for sure.

Or Florida (aka Urban Meyer pulling the Pete Carroll)?

Grahambino

February 24th, 2011 at 6:40 PM ^

All these teams (aside from PSU) are teams I wouldn't really be blown away by.  I mean any SEC Team you have to figure is dirty from the get go, but what if it were Texas or Oklahoma?? I mean as much as I hate Texas for beating us in the best Rose Bowl Game ever (except for our national championship win), I respect the heck out of Mack Brown and Bob Stoops.  If it were either of those two teams I would be absolutely shocked.

APBlue

February 24th, 2011 at 7:00 PM ^

"a major D-1 school that not many would expect "

If that's the case, you can rule out OSU, USC, Oregon, UNC, and the entire SEC.  I don't think that many of us would be surprised to see these allegations levied against those schools.  My picks would be Texas, Clemson, Iowa, or Kansas State.  Clemson & KSU are probably out because...really..."Major D-1 Program"???  That leaves us with Texas or Iowa. 

Where's your money?

mghorm

February 24th, 2011 at 8:43 PM ^

why wouldn't you be surprised by oregon. I've  never anything dirty about them. They even kicked their heisman candidate QB off the team. They've got the nike money burning holes in their pockets (and apparently on their basketball court), they have become much more relevant in the last 5-6 years, their in the same conference USC, and whats more shocking than the MNC runner up recruiting scandal.

mghorm

February 24th, 2011 at 8:43 PM ^

why wouldn't you be surprised by oregon. I've  never anything dirty about them. They even kicked their heisman candidate QB off the team. They've got the nike money burning holes in their pockets (and apparently on their basketball court), they have become much more relevant in the last 5-6 years, their in the same conference USC, and whats more shocking than the MNC runner up recruiting scandal.

Bryan

February 24th, 2011 at 7:04 PM ^

It cam out yesterday that they 'may' have some damning stuff on Auburn, Miss State and 'bama...but they are still trying to get a few people on the record.

EDIT: It cam out yesterday, haha

swan flu

February 24th, 2011 at 7:07 PM ^

Is this bet-able on Bodog yet?  If so, I'd like to put a few bucks on Wisconsin.  Brett Bielema is such an ass-hat; he deserves the (football version of the) death penalty.

bronxblue

February 24th, 2011 at 7:19 PM ^

Must be a slow news day.

Nothing against the OP, but this reads like one of those fortune-tellers who use generalizations and some murky language to "divine" that I had a dog growing up that I cared about, broke a bone playing a sport, and liked hotdogs at baseball games.

Yes, a big-name team will be caught paying its players -- just like they have for years.  UM, USC, most of the SEC, FSU, SMU, etc. - it happens, and saying stuff like "oh yeah, it may be out by the summer" is just nebulous enough that when you hear Tenn. or Auburn are being investigated in April it will sound like foresight instead of mere generaliztions.

Darth Tressel

February 24th, 2011 at 7:27 PM ^

What about Boise State? It seems whenever they're playing they talk about how they recruit so well out of California. Would any decent player really want to go from California to Idaho to play on that horrendous abomination of a field?