The Maize Hypocrisy
You mofos are so fickle you know that?
Just look at this god damn poll and tell me you didn't want this proper shade of Maize that you all are bitching about now.
http://mgoblog.com/content/maize-poll
http://poll.pollcode.com/41255479_result?vhttp://poll.pollcode.com/4125…
(Results)
FFCB05 is the official color. That's what we got. That's what won the poll. Quit being cry babies.
Deal. With. It.
September 5th, 2015 at 5:15 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 8:07 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 11:26 AM ^
The Maize we used in Utah didn't get it done! Was there an OR on the color chart?
September 5th, 2015 at 12:37 PM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 2:32 PM ^
The question is how are you back on the blog? And why?
September 5th, 2015 at 5:41 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 6:12 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 9:15 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 9:24 AM ^
Exactly. Those results are completely invalid and, in fact, without being told which was the official maize, people preferred a lighter maize. Therein lies your hypocrisy: the people who chose the "official" color because they wanted to be right, even though they might have actually preferred something else.
In the end, there's nothing wrong with preferring a different shade. The shade has always been evolving - for decades. It wasn't a new phenomenon. I don't know why we need to berate fellow Michigan fans because they preferred a shade of maize that Michigan used over another shade of maize Michigan used.
September 5th, 2015 at 10:37 AM ^
Amen to that.
Hopefully Nike gets us back to the lighter shade of maize. The perfect balance between Adidas electric highlighter and this new WVU/Cal maize that looks completely odd.
September 5th, 2015 at 11:01 AM ^
We don't wear WVU/Cal maize. WVU and Cal wear Michigan maize.
September 5th, 2015 at 11:21 AM ^
Uhh, ok dude. That's like, the entire point people are making in this thread. Michigan had a distintive maize that popped on HDTV and that no other university had. Now they look like about 5 other schools with a shade of maize they have never worn before.
September 5th, 2015 at 12:53 PM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 12:54 PM ^
Exactly. No idea why there was such a push in the firt place to change the maize.
I get that Adidas may have went a touch overboard on how highlighter they made the maize, but they completely overrcorrected the problem this year with something way too dark.
I really hope Nike takes us back to the maize from the mid 90's to late 2000's next year.
I just can't get used to looking at a helmet that looks like some winged combo of Toledo, WVU, Cal, and Iowa gold.
September 5th, 2015 at 1:04 PM ^
Yes, it's an overreaction to Addidas' highlighter yellow, primarily on the basketball uniforms.
The simple solution is to go back to the Nike maize that was good enough for Charles:
We can all agree . . . it was a happy time.
September 5th, 2015 at 10:15 AM ^
Well said. The maize is too dark. We've never worn maize this dark before. I detailed in photos that in the thread. This whole idea of getting back to "official maize" is complete non sense. Michigan had a distinctive maize that popped on TV and in person and now we look like WVU. And for what? So people who lived in the 70's can say I like it? Please. Even Bo never wore maize this dark.
September 5th, 2015 at 11:38 AM ^
If you looked at the "There are..." posts you could see the evolution of the Maize from Leach to Henson to Henne, from AC to Derrick to Braylon.
I'm of an age where the color of Maize we wore in the Leach/AC photos gives me a warm fuzzy, like the Autumn light of October hitting the changing leaves and the smell of cider and warm donuts.
But the Maize worn my Woodson in the Rose Bowl always looks pretty sweet too, especially when he's 14 ft in the air snatching that endzone Int. So obviously, what I'm saying is the color that wins is the "best" color!
Unis looked great in SLC, even though they "didn't git er dun"
September 5th, 2015 at 11:55 AM ^
Leach:
AC:
Henson:
Braylon:
Thursday:
It looked ridiculous.
September 5th, 2015 at 12:11 PM ^
Also, you keep reinforcing your opinion of what we did wear vs should wear by posting team photos taken in the blinding summer sun... post some game action Leach or AC shots (a different AC pic than that same one you've posted 2 or 3 times already).
Try the famous Indiana catch by AC, or Leach in the Rose Bowl. It'll come to you... not EVERYTHING your parents like sucks!
September 5th, 2015 at 12:15 PM ^
The funniest part of this fanbase still being stuck in the 70's is that Bo Schembechler adjusted to the times better than anyone. Just look no further than how his offense evolved from 69 to 89. The lighter maize looks better. period.
September 5th, 2015 at 3:37 PM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 7:33 PM ^
Exactly.
September 5th, 2015 at 12:15 PM ^
And the Braylon 2003 pic you posted is Verrry close to the highlighter yellow so many do not care for.
September 5th, 2015 at 12:17 PM ^
The only people who don't care for the lighter shade of maize are the fans still stuck in the 1970's (which I've proven over and over Michigan never wore maize this dark even then). You know what else was popular in the 70's? Bellbottoms. Guess we should bring those back to. And let's go live in a van down by the river. That sounds cool too.
Good lord.
September 5th, 2015 at 1:27 PM ^
... which I've proven over and over Michigan never wore maize this dark even then
Rob Lytle disagrees:
September 5th, 2015 at 1:47 PM ^
It's the way photos were processed back then. Already discussed. And again, the 1970's are fucking over. Good god.
September 5th, 2015 at 2:30 PM ^
I am not familiar with the discussion about how photos were processed back then, nor how older photos may be digitally changed now. But I was there back then, you weren't.
For comparison on the maize then and now, below is a Chris Perry jersey from the 2004 Rose Bowl purchased then, and below is a banner I bought in 1979 (the only thing I have from back then) in the same photograph.
Note the difference. The maize in the banner is the same as was on the helmets and the GO BLUE banner the players touch at mid field before every home game.
As far as the 1970's being "fucking over," thanks for the news.
September 5th, 2015 at 2:47 PM ^
Sorry, that is not a 2004 Rose Bowl jersey. That is what we call a knock off. No Nike swoosh, Rose Bowl patch not on the shoulders etc. As for the banner, uh, do you realize how many different manufacturers make Michigan products that use all kinds of shades of maize? If this is your proof of something I'm trying hard to figure out what.
Now, the REAL 2004 Rose Bowl jersey:
Oh, and here's the 1979 Rose Bowl. Your memory needs some work:
September 5th, 2015 at 2:48 PM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 2:21 PM ^
My Rob Lytle disagrees with your Rob Lytle.
September 5th, 2015 at 2:23 PM ^
M-Dog, do you think we should bring back the sloppy ass paint job on the winged helmets as well? I mean it was good enough for Bo :)
September 5th, 2015 at 3:40 PM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 2:42 PM ^
1969:
September 5th, 2015 at 1:11 PM ^
I first laid eyes directly on a Michigan uniform in 1982. The maize was bright yellow not orangy yellow. And the colors were not new in 1982. They were the same colors used in the late '70s at the very least.
There has been no recent shift to bright yellow from orangy yellow. Period. The only shift has been Addidas going too "Oregon" highlighter yellow in the last few years. That can be fixed without overreacting and going to an imaginary color that never was.
September 5th, 2015 at 6:21 AM ^
What I don't appreciate is seeing a picture of our "game managing" 5th year ago QB who single-handidly lost the Utah game for us.
Couldn't you have used a Peppers picture or something? Not the best way to start my Saturday.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 5th, 2015 at 6:56 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 5th, 2015 at 7:17 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 7:54 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 8:20 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 8:37 AM ^
Or close your eyes.
Or both.
September 5th, 2015 at 9:28 AM ^
says the guy with Dom Fucking Ingerson in his avatar? Jesus Christ, man
September 5th, 2015 at 6:56 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 5th, 2015 at 7:03 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 5th, 2015 at 7:43 AM ^
September 5th, 2015 at 8:33 AM ^
Agree entirely. Very 70s, the real deal. Wasn't as excited about the all white unis, prefer the maize pants on the road, but the bit they did on TV about it -- Harbaugh remembers those from the '74-'75 era -- ok, I'm cool with that too. Not that h checked with me, of course.
September 5th, 2015 at 11:10 AM ^
It wasn't 70's at all. Do people here just make stuff up? Also why is this fan base stuck in the 1970's? CFB has changed. The maize looked ridiculous on Thursday. Oh, and here is a pic from the 70's...Les Miles.
September 5th, 2015 at 1:14 PM ^
Thank You.
People are just making shit up.
Did you know that we won 3 national championships in the '70's?
September 5th, 2015 at 1:21 PM ^
I blame mgoblog. If they never would have conducted that stupid poll Michigan might still have the maize it's had for the past 20-40 years. The funniest part is once Seth removed the "official maize" label nearly everyone preferred a lighter shade of maize.
What I've found out here and other Michigan boards is that this segment of the fan base is for the most part the fringe diehards who don't want to criticize anything Michigan does.
The maize needs changed. I don't want to watch Cal in winged helmets every weekend.
September 5th, 2015 at 2:24 PM ^
I don't think MGoBlog is that influential.
It's just a blog. It's not like it can influence who the AD is or anything.
Wait . . . what?
September 5th, 2015 at 3:43 PM ^