Magnuson says UM #1

Submitted by quiqsilver on

Following in the line of "the answer to this question is always yes, but you should pay to confirm your excellent skills of deduction" questions, Scout asks "Does Michigan Lead For Magnuson?"

Google says "yes":

They are my number one, so I'm not afraid to say that. It's always been kind of on the back of my mind but I've never really said it.

Let the good times roll.

wlubd

May 30th, 2011 at 3:39 PM ^

Huge deal that he's visiting weekend after next. Desperately need tackles and he's probably the best one we have a shot at.

ken725

May 30th, 2011 at 6:50 PM ^

Not trying to be a jerk, but what do you look for when you watch film on an OT.  I have no idea what I should be looking for.  I just know that is he get the guy on his back it is pretty good.  I know that footwork is a big deal, but what the actually is totally beyond me.  

wlubd

May 30th, 2011 at 5:24 PM ^

Not trying to pick in the sense that we would only take one, only doing it to indicate to the guy who asked that Diamond being considered, I think Magnuson is the best OT we have a shot at. I also fully expect us to land both of them in this class, which I'm all for.

michfan6060

May 30th, 2011 at 3:53 PM ^

He and Diamond could be great tackles for a long time. I'm really glad Hoke and Funk developed such a good relationship with him at SDSU.

Chi-Blue

May 30th, 2011 at 5:22 PM ^

I am very hopeful that Magnuson commits next week as I think that would really move up Diamonds timetable. These are two very good tackle prospects and would in my mind leave room for one more OL. I'm looking at you Paul Thurston!!!