A quick reprise; a week or so ago Lynn Henning of the Detroit News wrote a piece basically asserting that we should not have fallen so far under RR, and that the assertion from some that talent was low was "ridiculous." I then sent him an email containing misopogon's great "decimated defense" analysis, and he replied to me, that he had read it and would "do better" next time. In today's News, he write an article focusing on the importance of the next A.D., but in the article he said the following:
"A new AD cut from Canham-grade cloth will understand the job and the challenges in advance. He or she will know that Rodriguez can fix things once a depleted roster gets the benefits of another winter or two of Michigan-grade recruiting."
I think we should salute Lynn for following through in his word, and backing off his previous anti-RR stance. Full article here:
http://www.detnews.com/article/20091121/OPINION03/911210396/1004/U-M-s-b...


But it raises a point that I think is nothing less than a complete indictment of "professional sports journalists," not only in Detroit but nationally.
On one hand, you have a cadre of well-paid individuals whose day jobs are totally devoted to covering sports, and there is absolutely nothing in their terms of employment that would prevent them from working nights as well. They have, by our standards, virtually unlimited resources to aid in research, including interns, access to statistical databases, access to program insiders that "normal" people don't, and the support of large organizations nominally devoted to the gathering, analysis, and dissemination of information.
On the other hand, you have a motley collection of unconnected individuals, virtually none of whom are trained or educated in "journalism." The vast majority of these individuals in fact have day jobs in fields that have nothing to do with sports, which was the case with Brian before MGoBlog took off. These individuals have to do research on their own time, after their day jobs or day classes, for no financial reward, with virtually none of the organizational advantages that writers at the Freep and the News and ESPN and SI have. They can't call up Rich Rodriguez or Bill Martin or Mike Barwis or former players for inside information; they have to wait for the "professionals" to interview them to glean needed information.
Given all this, which is the group of people that you would logically assume would be the first to have researched the details of Michigan's roster issues, with respect to recent recruiting class attrition? Which of these groups would have logically been the one to get at the real stories behind Boren's departure and the Freep's smear efforts?
Overall, regardless of isolated exceptions, there is not a more incompetent, disinterested, arrogant, and above all, stunningly lazy group of alleged "professionals" in this country than "sports journalists."