Creedence Tapes

October 18th, 2013 at 12:08 PM ^

We are doing "breast cancer awareness" at my work on Fridays this month, and all this means is that we get free Safeway pastries made with artificial ingredients and are encouraged to wear a pink shirt. I really do not see how this does anything more than make people think they are doing something when they are not. I'm pretty sure everyone is aware of breast cancer by now.

Cold War

October 18th, 2013 at 11:30 AM ^

Something tells me all of our muckrakers finding fault with this are really just not comfortable with pink on a football field.

TrppWlbrnID

October 18th, 2013 at 11:33 AM ^

as an awareness campaign, november is diabetes month, a disease that is often largely preventable with exercise and diet, affects 8% of all americans (26,000,000) and has about 100 times as many new diagnoses each year as breast cancer, 1.9m to 23k.

also, having diabetes makes you more prone to impotence and having a dick (or vagina) that oozes grainy pus. there is your psa, walk more, eat better, drink less, don't get oozing genitals

football sponsored by beer, cars and junk food, not gonna happen. just hang out at buffalo wild wings all day, drive your truck home and eat some taco bell with dorito shells.

MGoRyan

October 18th, 2013 at 11:42 AM ^

I don't have time to do this since I'm at work, but can someone go on the White House's website and start a petition to end pink/BC awareness on the football field?  I think we can get enough votes for the issue to be addressed.

Also, let's send the petition to DB, and inundate his inbox.

MGoRyan

October 18th, 2013 at 12:44 PM ^

1) It's not politics, it's just PR to let everyone know this era has had enough breast cancer awareness on the football field (and life in general).

2) Again, you are correct, but it's just a free platform for national exposure.  I doubt it would seriously get done, but I couldn't come up with a better way.

Sigh... I guess I'll just bitch at the TV and on message boards as always.  Pink is probably here to stay.

Soulfire21

October 18th, 2013 at 11:57 AM ^

I don't understand the article.  Not a lot of money from NFL gear sales go to the American Cancer Society, so let's get rid of it?  100% of auctioned gear proceeds goes to the American Cancer Society (where the author laments that only around 70% of it is spent on actually finding a cure, which is the business of the American Cancer Society and not the fault of the NFL, as the author implies).

BiSB

October 18th, 2013 at 11:59 AM ^

Is that the NFL used the pink stuff primarily as a marketing tool and only secondarily as a charity effort (and only to the amount to be able to plausibly argue they were being philanthropic), and they give the money to Komen, which... shall we say... suuuucks.

Soulfire21

October 18th, 2013 at 12:05 PM ^

I get that, but the NFL has said (maybe they're lying?) that they don't actually profit from the pink gear they sell, their return goes into running Breast Cancer Awareness month.  I'm not sure this is much different than many charitable organizations, which see sky-high administrative costs (salaries, etc.) and then have to re-invest donations into additional fundraising mechanisms, leaving little (or a lot less than we would like) to the actual cause.

Though overall, I suppose I agree.  My issue is with the NFL being singled out whereas this is not unique at all to the NFL.  We don't really need more awareness, we need cures and solutions.

Brick in The Wave

October 18th, 2013 at 12:02 PM ^

I say we get rid of cancer all together, I mean really can you guys really name one time that cancer has been beneficial.

The question is if we get rid of cancer what disease do we bring in to replace it?

I know there are some big names out there I read somewhere that Michigan was Ebola's dream job.

Brick in The Wave

October 18th, 2013 at 1:51 PM ^

I don't think diabetes helps us at all in this situation too old school.  See the problem with this style of cancer is that it keeps attacking the same cells.  The doctors pack the box with surgery, radiation treatment, and chemotherapy and what does cancer do?  Keeps right on attacking the same cells.  Why not a quick hitter to the lung or bubble screen to the colon?

In reply to by Wolverine Devotee

Monocle Smile

October 18th, 2013 at 12:06 PM ^

Anti-vax, politics, and now religion in the same thread.

And yet it will probably stay up because it's relevant and we're all too emotionally worn out to flame.