Clarence Beeks

March 24th, 2015 at 9:35 PM ^

I'm willing to bet they do a heck of a lot more than that, but that you never took advantage of finding out what they actually can do. How many individual appointments did you have? Also, your numbers are just wrong about what they make. This is publicly available information.

RedShirt232

March 25th, 2015 at 12:15 AM ^

"Willing to bet?"  I second the experience of someone who disagrees with you about the value of career services.  Look, I'm sure you're a nice guy.  Maybe you work for a law school or otherwise have a dog in this fight.  That's fine.  But you don't need to shill for them when you're not actually on the job.  I work for clients I don't like, because I need to make a living, too (especially after all that debt).  But I don't do that work for free. 

Clarence Beeks

March 25th, 2015 at 1:04 AM ^

I explained in my prior post (to which you responded) what I do and from where my perspective comes. I'm not shilling, but rather just have no problem stating that it's more likely than not that he didn't utilize his CSO properly. If someone ever says "they just out emails" or "they just told me to go network" it's a dead giveaway that they didn't utilize everything they paid for. I say "willing to bet" because most likely it's true (and you didn't provide anything to refute it), as there is a strong correlation between those who complain loudest about the quality of a CSO and those who underutilized their CSO. That said, and this is somewhat altered by another of his posts below (or above? - I'm on the app), his experience with the CSO at Michigan is dated (and may not, at all, reflect the nature of their CSO today). If it is untrue, I'm sorry that he (and it appears you, as well) went to a school that didn't have adequate support for you and you classmates. I've done this for quite awhile now, and to great impact, and I can absolutely tell you that the value of the CSO can absolutely make or break the quality of outcomes.

Braylons Butte…

March 25th, 2015 at 3:09 AM ^

I didn't go to Michigan, but I can confirm the uselessness of my school's career development office. If you weren't a part of the typical biglaw OCI train, you were told to network network network. No one in the office attempted to do much other than maybe give you an obvious suggestion to do some informational interviews or google alumni in the area of interest. I made appointments with no fewer than 6 different counselors over the 2 years, multiple sessions for some. Always the same bs: network, do informational interviews, check the school job board where alums post positions. I'm actually getting angry recalling my interactions with them.

I think bschools (the best ones anyway) do a much better job of installing people in the career office who are excellent networkers in their own right, and can actually truly help place you in meaningful internships and positions. At least in my school's case, the turnover year to year pretty much prevented that--it would always be some recent alum who needed a job or some old out of touch lady who didn't have a clue about the hiring climate.

Clarence Beeks

March 25th, 2015 at 8:41 AM ^

That is an absolute shame. I'm sorry to hear that. The CSO is such an easy (and obvious) thing for schools to ensure has proper resources and why they don't is beyond me. My law school experience with CSO was somewhat like you describe, but that's exactly what motivated me to do it different when I made the jump back from private practice. It just can't be done effectively by hiring an alum that just needs a job; just can't. It requires a legit skill set (either in place or that can developed). The thing about focuses only on OCI students is awful, too. Just makes no sense. Honestly, what I will say, though, is that the whole "network network network" thing actually does work. The problem, though, is no one wants to hear that because (1) it isn't necessarily easy and (2) it just sounds like really cheap advice. It's PART of an effective search strategy, but it can't be the only part (nor can it be presented to a student/graduate that way).



MGoFisticuffs

March 24th, 2015 at 7:56 PM ^

This is very true. Luckily the Michigan brand has opened many doors for me(and I'm very good at interviewing, which has translated to success), but after deciding to quit Law School it was definitely a walk in the woods. Generally the cream does eventually rise to the top, but it would be nice if they gave more of an effort to expose students to available opportunities(which they certainly could do easily by leveraging the alumni network).

Unless you are graduating from one of the programs that is directly recruited out of school(which is many), you're basically left to fend for yourself.

tbeindit

March 24th, 2015 at 8:00 PM ^

Wasn't going to post anything significant in here, but since there are so many people offering horror stories, I figured I would offer something more on the positive side of things for people considering law school about my own experience.

It's sounds cliche, but I've wanted to go to law school and become a lawyer since I was a kid, so I didn't decide to go to law school because I didn't know what else to do.  It's something I wanted to do.

Unfortunately, I didn't quite have the grades and/or LSAT score to get into the T14 schools, which left me to decide whether I wanted to go to a higher ranked law school with little or no aid or a "local" school with a lot of scholarship aid.

I opted to head to Wayne State on a full ride and have actually found the resources and opportunities to be pretty solid considering that WSU isn't exactly a T14 school.  I did alright my first year and got offered several clerk positions at good firms in the state.  Right now, I'm working at a firm in downtown Detroit and finishing up my 2L year.

Honestly not trying to sound like a WSU booster or something here, but I've actually been amazed at some of the opportunities I have been able to get that friends at schools like MSU, UM, or out of state schools have been unable to find.  It's astounding to me.  This honestly is not me trying to sound impressive, but I had friends at much better law schools than WSU that could not find paid employment

My advice for people considering law school is definitely to first weigh the factors as many have mentioned above.  It's not easy and there are people there that absolutely love it - as weird as that sounds. But if you do decide to go, I wouldn't be as afraid of the "smaller" schools as many make it sound.  Maybe that elite law job isn't waiting there when you graduate, but I think there are plenty of opportunities out there still and you have the potential to graduate with no debt.

Pinky

March 24th, 2015 at 8:30 PM ^

Hey everyone, you should definitely go to law school because tbeindit will have no debt.  Nevermind that less than half of graduates from his law school are fully employed after 9 months, or that the average law school debt is 84,000 for students at public schools and 122,158 for private schools.  Go.  You'll will almost certainly be rich despite the statistics.

Look man, I'm happy for you that you seem like you're going to beat the odds, but don't try to convince everyone else to play the lottery because you happened to draw a winning ticket.  Law school is a BAD gamble for almost everyone regardless of the perceived quality of the school.  I apologize for being a dick here, but it frustrates me when people ignore numbers in favor of anecdotes.

tbeindit

March 24th, 2015 at 8:44 PM ^

Nice job building a strawman argument, but ok.  At no point in any of my comments did I tell anyone that they would "be rich" or "try to convince everyone" to go to law school.  If I recall correctly, my advice was to consider all the factors that everyone else had discussed earlier in deciding if they wanted to go to law school and if they still wanted to go to law school, not to be as afraid of the small schools as people make it out to be. 

I ignored no numbers when I decided to go to WSU.  I actually reviewed the exact sites most of you are posting on here before I made my decision, but, for me, it was the best choice because I had already decided that I wanted to go to law school and didn't want to graduate with 100K+ of debt and no job.  That's why I went somewhere that I got a full scholarship so that if I wasn't able to get a job, at least I wouldn't have that money hanging over my head.

My situation doesn't apply to everyone's situation, just like I don't think your decision applies to everyone's situation.  But blindly pointing at employment numbers and acting as if it's a "gamble" isn't accurate either.  Are times tougher?  Absolutely and it's a huge reason why I am thankful that I have gotten some great opportunities.  However, I also think it's inaccurate to portray intelligently making a life decision about becoming a lawyer and working hard to achieve that goal the equivalent of buying a lotto ticket.  

It's a gamble when people make the kind of decision that I'm trying to warn against, which is going to a middle-tier law school because it has a "bigger" name so they can rack on a bunch of debt and have similar, if not worse odds at landing a job.

Pinky

March 24th, 2015 at 8:53 PM ^

Lol "blindly pointing at employment numbers."  There is no possible way you typed that with a straight face.

Your school has less than half of its graduates fully employed after 9 months.  You have no argument here, unless its "you're going to be unemployed anyways, so why not be unemployed with no debt?"

tbeindit

March 24th, 2015 at 9:08 PM ^

Sigh.  I'll try this again.

The reason I used the phrase "blindly pointing at employment numbers" is because the decision is different for each individual.  Even if you just look at the field of law you want to get into, the availability of jobs can massively change.  I'm sure this isn't news to you, but if your only goal is to make money, you probably shouldn't be going to law school to begin with, which goes into making your original decision, as I already stated a few times.

My argument here is that if you have already decided to go to law school AND are not the type of student who can qualify for a T14 school, not to be afraid of small schools because they lack the name and prestige of a bigger school.  

I'm not arguing that law school is a good decision for everyone.  I'm not arguing that Wayne is the best or even a great law school.  I'm arguing that if you are in the group where you are deciding to go to a school like MSU or a school like WSU, not to be as a afraid of the smaller school because you can very likely lower your potential debt by an extremely large margin, which is certainly better in a worse case scenario.

Primo

March 24th, 2015 at 8:57 PM ^

Unless you get something close to a full ride scholarship, law school is absolutely a gamble. And that point is precisely made by pointing to "the numbers." Anytime you sign up for a situation in which X people decide to take on large sums of debt to chase Y amount of jobs, and Y is at least 8 times as much as X, you are gambling with your financial future.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

tbeindit

March 24th, 2015 at 9:10 PM ^

Eh, I would prefer the term "risk" to "gamble," but I guess that's just my perspective.  Still, I agree with your point here, but that's why I offered my advice.  I think you can remove a hell of a lot from that risk if you're in that group of students I'm referencing and you go to a place where you can get a lot of money.

tbeindit

March 24th, 2015 at 8:23 PM ^

Yeah, and the employment score for Michigan State is 36.9%, which typically has harder admission standards and thus, is harder to get scholarship dollars from.  The biggest part of my point was that if you can't get into a T14 and still want to go to a law school, that the small schools are a lot closer than rankings would make you believe, which I think is pretty evident at least between MSU and WSU.

Clarence Beeks

March 24th, 2015 at 9:05 PM ^

Your experience will surprise exactly no one who actually knows anything about legal recruiting. I'm in charge of recruiting for one of the best law schools in the country (not T14, but widely known and highly ranked), so I know a little more about this topic than most. People get so tied up on going to "T14" schools, but the reality is that outside of jobs at certain types of firms and in certain narrow markets (which are absolutely not what the majority of law students actually want for their careers), it's almost irrelevant. If you go to a top tier (a very different thing that the limited number of T14 schools) in or near the market that you want to be in, you almost have to try to not get a job within short order of obtaining bar results (anyone who ever mentions "at graduation" employment rates in law is a sure tell that they don't know what they are talking about - the vast majority of the legal field doesn't hire on that cycle - they hire once bar results are in hand). I'm literally not joking with that last statement. The problem, more than anything else, is the misperceptions that most people (including most lawyers) have about the actual state of the legal employment market. It's way, way better than most everyone thinks it is (unless you're beholden to "big law" and believe that's the only type of law there is). A big part of this problem is that almost all "legal media" is New York-centric, so it has a major big law bias, so when big law is "down" (which it is now), everything is doom and gloom. It's just not remotely true.

RedShirt232

March 25th, 2015 at 12:23 AM ^

This explains a lot, especially why you're focusing on the availability of legal jobs (which I still think you're overstating) and not the quality of legal jobs.  If your monthly loan payment is almost two grand (i.e., around $24K a year), and the job you're lucky enough to get in non-Big Law pays anywhere from $45K to $80K pre-tax, then you're somewhere between lower middle class and maybe just slightly more than paycheck-to-paycheck.  And that's if you're single with no dependents.

Clarence Beeks

March 25th, 2015 at 1:06 AM ^

You've actually got this all wrong (at least with how it works practically). If you're making anywhere in the range you stated, you wouldn't ever gave a loan payment remotely that high (especially if you have dependents). I'm guessing you graduated law school pre-2010?

BayWolves

March 24th, 2015 at 8:04 PM ^

Law schools are unfortunately putting out far too many grads for the number of jobs available and a lot of legal work is being outsourced overseas. Beware of vast debt mountains and little means to pay it back after graduation. A lot of folks are in big trouble from this.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

chatster

March 24th, 2015 at 9:57 PM ^

It can be backbreaking work and it’s not as easy as people think, but it’s a good trade, and we aren’t going to be outsourced any time soon.  I’ve worked for some lawyers, so I know a little about their arrogance and also about their dissatisfaction with their work.  Lawyers like to talk.
 
Last week, I was called to fix a heavy leak caused by a frozen pipe in a lawyer’s home in the suburbs of New York City. As I go down to the basement, I hear the lawyer start complaining to his wife that his prominent, hot-shot law partner just took credit for a big settlement for which the lawyer had done most of the work.  The lawyer said that he’d gone six days without sleep to negotiate the deal, that his client was thrilled, and the judge complimented him for his efforts.
 
The lawyer comes down to the basement after about fifteen minutes to check on what I was doing. By then, I’d been able to stop the leak by cutting off the water from the line into the house and sealing the pipe that leaked.  I put some insulation on the pipe, set up a heat lamp to unfreeze the pipe and went back to my truck to get some more parts.
 
I took another fifteen minutes or so to finish the work and get the water flowing freely again.  I had the lawyer and his wife check all the faucets and shower heads in the house to make sure that water was coming through, and I went back out to my truck to get the bill.
 
When I hand the lawyer a bill for $300.00, he gets furious and starts yelling at me, like he’s John McEnroe and I’m the tennis official sitting in the chair, “You can’t be serious! I’m a partner in a major Manhattan law firm. I work on very important cases.  Even I don’t make that kind of money for half an hour of work!”
 
“Neither did I when I was a lawyer,” I told him.

Baughhumbug

March 24th, 2015 at 10:10 PM ^

This is totally accurate. Most people should not go to law school. I second the person who commented earlier saying, "only go to law school if you know you want to be a lawyer." Not only is law school a bad financial investment for most people, the harsh reality is that most people don't actually enjoy the work.

That said, some of us love it! It's not all doom and gloom. There are great jobs out there if you get a high LSAT score, get a scholarship, go to a top school, and get good grades. Those are very big IFs. And the "great jobs" are still very stressful, even if you enjoy the work -- though I think that is true in a lot of professions. 

Do your research and do an internship or work as a paralegal before committing. 

FatGuyLittleCoat

March 24th, 2015 at 11:29 PM ^

Graduated from a top 40 law school and am doing fine. Make connections, be kind to people, and get involved in the community. Being a lawyer isn't for everyone, and that's okay. But those in the profession should help others succeed in it rather than knock them down and discourage potential lawyers. Being an attorney is quite rewarding at times. Whether you attend Harvard or Wayne State, work as an attorney can be satisfying and rewarding on a daily basis. Do what makes you happy!

The Dad Abides

March 25th, 2015 at 9:35 AM ^

I've been an attorney for twenty-two years and I give the same advice to every student that asks me if they should go to law school.  Make certain it is exactly what you want.  The thought of law school just because is point blank stupid.  There are much better things to do with your time than spend hundred of thousands of dollars and lose your hair.

1408

March 25th, 2015 at 11:42 AM ^

Otherwise avoid. Probably fine to go sticker at Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Chicago and then ok with aid at Columbia, Nya, uva, mich, nu, Cornell, Georgetown, penn, etc. anywhere else should me debt free. Actually way easier to get into law school now than it was even 5 years ago, the word is getting out. I went to one of the schools mentioned above and all my classmates are doing well but many have tremendous debt (200k or more) that they will carry forever.

1408

March 25th, 2015 at 11:42 AM ^

Otherwise avoid. Probably fine to go sticker at Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Chicago and then ok with aid at Columbia, Nya, uva, mich, nu, Cornell, Georgetown, penn, etc. anywhere else should me debt free. Actually way easier to get into law school now than it was even 5 years ago, the word is getting out. I went to one of the schools mentioned above and all my classmates are doing well but many have tremendous debt (200k or more) that they will carry forever.