Home
supporting the Clint Eastwood State Fightin' John Waynes since 2011

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Brice's Recruiting
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Football Recruiting
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Find the best US sports betting sites on the web at onlinebetting.com. Sports wagering is getting more and more popular each year, so place your bets online today.

Enjoy online gambling? Why not try online poker or online roulette? Especially online roulette for real money. If you are going to play poker, then make sure you use the PartyPoker bonus code or PokerStars marketing code when signing up to these two poker giants.

If you're looking for online sports betting, Sportsbooks is your best option. Nothing else compares in variety and reliability.

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Always better to play free blackjack and free Flash slots online before making a purchase on any real online casino.

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • An early look at Michigan men's tennis
    BlueDragon - 16 hours ago
  • Coach Beilein, Chris Webber, starry-eyed boys, and $100,000 worth of inspiration
    buddhafrog - 19 hours ago
  • The Blockhams in "SUPER BOWL XLVI"
    Six Zero - 1 day ago
  • Turnover Margin and Wins: Is there a Correlation? Analyzing College Football Turnover Margins Since 2006
    Maize_in_spartyland - 1 day ago
  • Michigan Hockey: Special Teams Breakdown
    CenterIce - 1 day ago
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 2-5-12
    Ace - 5,137 views
  • The Blockhams in "SUPER BOWL XLVI"
    Six Zero - 1,876 views
  • Coach Beilein, Chris Webber, starry-eyed boys, and $100,000 worth of inspiration
    buddhafrog - 1,724 views
  • Michigan Hockey: Miami Preview
    CenterIce - 817 views
  • Give Blood, Save Lives, Beat MSU
    M Wolve - 809 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 2-5-12
    Ace - 27 comments
  • Coach Beilein, Chris Webber, starry-eyed boys, and $100,000 worth of inspiration
    buddhafrog - 18 comments
  • Diagramming the Powerplay
    CenterIce - 16 comments
  • Team Performance versus Scout Recruit Class Rank
    WolverineLake - 11 comments
  • Turnover Margin and Wins: Is there a Correlation? Analyzing College Football Turnover Margins Since 2006
    Maize_in_spartyland - 10 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • UM Hockey to play at CoPa - NHL Winter Classic at Michigan Stadium per mlive.com
    14 replies
  • Rivals 100 Live Chat
    3 replies
  • Un film dérangeant: Catlab-Buckeye-Urban-Tress
    25 replies
  • Michigan Football All-Hype Team
    50 replies
  • 2013 Rivals 100 Out
    108 replies
  • ESPN: Big Ten Considering a 4-Team Playoff
    61 replies
  • Semi-OT: MGoBookclub During this Offseason?
    40 replies
  • Mike Martin 500 lb. bench press
    47 replies
  • Mock Rock 2012
    23 replies
  • 2013 OT J J Gustafson (Dallas, TX) Offered
    17 replies
  • Tremendous: Dan Gibbs Interview
    34 replies
  • Laquon Treadwell visiting this weekend.
    24 replies
  • OT: Man donates SB bet to charity
    19 replies
  • OT - funny stuff
    31 replies
  • Video: Beilein Pre-Nebraska Presser
    5 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 13
  • ››
  • 2013 Rivals 100 Out
    108 replies
  • Michigan Football All-Hype Team
    50 replies
  • UM Hockey to play at CoPa - NHL Winter Classic at Michigan Stadium per mlive.com
    14 replies
  • Mike Martin 500 lb. bench press
    47 replies
  • Semi-OT: MGoBookclub During this Offseason?
    40 replies
  • Vote for Coach Beilein (everyday)
    5 replies
  • Rivals 100 Live Chat
    3 replies
  • ESPN: Big Ten Considering a 4-Team Playoff
    61 replies
  • Hello: Sierra Romero (SB)
    58 replies
  • Un film dérangeant: Catlab-Buckeye-Urban-Tress
    25 replies
  • Tremendous: Dan Gibbs Interview
    34 replies
  • Junior Hemingway's accolades stolen from family home in SC
    30 replies
  • Laquon Treadwell visiting this weekend.
    24 replies
  • Regents to discuss 2013 Winter Classic at Big House tomorrow
    28 replies
  • meta: a couple of site updates (mobile apps)
    37 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 13
  • ››
  • Michigan vs. Michigan State Basketball Open Thread
    510 replies
  • MBB vs. Indiana Open Thread
    327 replies
  • Jordan Diamond not to Michigan per Ondre Pipkins
    203 replies
  • Super Bowl Open Thread
    200 replies
  • Michigan - Miami(NTM) Hockey Open Thread (Also drinking, hoozah!)
    183 replies
  • Jordan Diamond Announcement: To Auburn
    181 replies
  • Friday Night Hockey, Beer, and General Drunken Foolishness Thread
    156 replies
  • OT: Dantonio says MSU got top player in MI
    136 replies
  • If you were negative recruiting against Michigan today....what would you say?
    132 replies
  • The "Five of Diamond's" theory
    126 replies
  • Red Wings and Drinking Open Thread
    110 replies
  • 2013 Rivals 100 Out
    107 replies
  • Hello: Dan Gibbs
    104 replies
  • Bielema thinks Meyer is a dirty recruiter
    100 replies
  • OT: Rick's American Cafe
    95 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 14
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Team of the Week: Michigan

    “We were losing a bunch of one-goal games, and now we’re able to pull these games out,” Hunwick said. “It’s huge in the second half to know you can play in games like that.”

    0 comments
  • Talking tempo free

    good advice for journalists trying to gently introduce readers to better basketball stats

    0 comments
  • Play-by-Play Theater: Earliest disqualification

    a salute to Hawaii-New Mexico.

    0 comments
  • Despite Mitch McGary's slide, Michigan basketball's 2012 class rated higher than Michigan State's

    "I'm a big fan of (Robinson's) game in general. He's got a big, strong athletic body, he rebounds, he shoots well off the catch, and I think he'll also be a really good defender. He's a guy who I think has the potential to play in the NBA one day."

    1 comments
  • Shawn Hunwick and Lee Moffie named CCHA players of the week

    watch the end of year all conference teams ignore Hunwick. I give it 50-50.

    0 comments
  • Scouting Video: Zak Irvin scores 28 points versus Bowman Academy

    long, doesn't look as bouncy as GRIII

    0 comments
  • For Manningham, Catch of a Lifetime Was Years in the Making

    here's the plan: run downfield and grab it

    0 comments
  • eBay Watch: Schembechler Snaps!!

    various images of Bo losing it

    0 comments
  • Manningham delivers in Giants' Super Bowl win

    Difference in the game was the receivers.

    1 comments
  • Gunfire to gridiron: Zoltan Mesko's Super Bowl story

    "I grew up in communism until I was three and a half years old, lived through a revolution, while bullets were flying through our apartment on Christmas Eve," Mesko, now 25, told reporters in Indianapolis, which is hosting the NFL's showpiece for the first time.

    0 comments
  • Ondre Pipkins already embracing rivalry with Ohio State

    They run their mouth, and then when they meet up with the belly of the beast -- I call myself that because I am -- then they want run away. When it comes to reality, they want to run away."

    1 comments
  • Ondre Pipkins is Brady Hoke's Next Intricately Rendered Sculpture in Ohio State's #1 Bathroom

    mgocatlab

    1 comments
  • 1996: Michigan-45 Michigan State-29 - YouTube

    WH

    0 comments
  • Hunwick named national player of the month

    on fiah

    1 comments
  • Big Ten: 'Legends' and 'Leaders' staying as league's division names for 2012

    just over half of people actually like them, which just goes to show that just over half of people need to be shot into the sun.

    4 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››
more

The "lateral" reversed call

23 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
November 7th, 2009 at 3:47 PM
#1
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 1828
The "lateral" reversed call

When can a penalty be reviewed. Essentially, the ruling on the field was that was Michigan did was legal, and the review apparently revealed that it was not legal. But where does the ability to retroactively make that distiction end? Can intentional grounding be reviewed? Or is it that penalties the commission of which can be objectively determined can be reversed? Man, not at all the reason for the loss, but sometimes it doesn't even seem that the rules for instant replay are consistent from game to game. And I'm I wrong, or is it rationally impossible for an "indisputable" call to take 10 minutes to determine. If it takes 10 minutes, clearly it hasn't met the treshold of indisputable. That being said, we f#@cking seriously lost this game? Win and we go to a bowl. We seriously lost? Depression = The rest of my weekend.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 7th, 2009 at 3:53 PM | I was surprised at that call (Score:1)
PIJER
PIJER's picture
Joined: 07/12/2009
MGoPoints: 319

I was surprised at that call reversal. Mainly because I didn't see one camera angle that showed me definitively that it was a forward pass. But still, M's defense is the worst I've ever seen!!!

"Homey don't play dat"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 3:54 PM | See this diary for why it's bad (Score:1)
bouje
bouje's picture
Joined: 09/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4708

http://mgoblog.com/diaries/decimated-defense-part-ii-statisticating

And yes I agree there is no way that they should have over-turned the call on the field.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 3:58 PM | He wasn't out of bounds. The (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 10172

He wasn't out of bounds. The ball never crossed the plane of out of bounds. There was no angle that they could have possibly determined that it was a forward lateral. The best view was the official that was right there on the field who called it a backwards pass.

What it came down to was that they didn't think it should be allowed because there was so much that could/should have gone wrong there, so they were trying to find something to overturn it on.

I am pissed. I want the head of that replay official.

My Ideal Offense: Part I

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:00 PM | count me in (Score:1)
YouRFree
YouRFree's picture
Joined: 10/15/2009
MGoPoints: 100

they are looking for something else to call off the play when they can't figure out how to rule.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:04 PM | Maybe I'm paranoid, but I (Score:1)
bdubya
bdubya's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 32

Maybe I'm paranoid, but I think the guys upstairs knew that Hemingway wasn't touched on that punt fumble and tried to find some way to make up for it.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:31 PM | Maybe even unconsciously? My (Score:1)
A Case of Blue
A Case of Blue's picture
Joined: 03/22/2009
MGoPoints: 571

Maybe even unconsciously?

My feeling on bad calls is that in the long run, it shakes out to be pretty much equal for everyone. You get some major favors sometimes, and sometimes you get jobbed.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 11:59 PM | I was thinking the same thing (Score:1)
noshesnot
Joined: 12/09/2008
MGoPoints: 2

I was thinking the same thing until I looked back at the punt...the Purdue guy was in the way of Hemingway being able to catch the ball, which caused him to trip. So no, the Purdue guy didn't trip him, but he did cause "kick catch interference"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:49 PM | Out of bounds isn't (Score:1)
nazooq
Joined: 07/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1364

Out of bounds isn't determined by the ball crossing a plane. It's determined by a player contacting the ground out of bounds. This case was ambiguous because Brown didn't touch the ground out of bounds but was resting on a Purdue player. Undoubtedly there's an obscure rule that governs this.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 5:06 PM | I know. I only mentioned it (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 10172

I know. I only mentioned it because I had seen that referred to in several spots.

My Ideal Offense: Part I

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:01 PM | There was no way you could (Score:1)
cpt20
Joined: 11/02/2008
MGoPoints: 402

There was no way you could tell if he pitched it forward, bad call. That holding call early on in the drive was shit too. They rarely call that for Michigan on defense. Then Purdue does not touch Hemingway.

The refs are just awful in every Big Ten game.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:05 PM | If that bullshit was (Score:1)
BlueTimesTwo
BlueTimesTwo's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1703

If that bullshit was reviewable (and overturned), how the fuck is too many men on the field not reviewable (or at least not reviewed)? We got burned against PSU and ILL on those ovbious non-calls, but they manage to overturn this one?

"People who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either being made."

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:08 PM | Is this what we are reduced to? (Score:1)
mgoblue911
mgoblue911's picture
Joined: 07/21/2008
MGoPoints: 29

Begging for no replays on a double lateral to our right tackle. Sad state of affairs... very sad. Remember when we were Michigan?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:26 PM | Ok... (Score:1)
HartAttack20
HartAttack20's picture
Joined: 06/08/2009
MGoPoints: 1181

The basic argument by people here is that we had no views of the replay that gave us any idea if it was a forward lateral or not. Along with that, since when can you review penalties? If they had a good view, which is extremely doubtful, and it was for sure a forward lateral, which again is extremely doubtful, then I'm fine with the reversed call. It just seems like poor reffing.

Andy, for the last time, I don't want your giant box of pornography.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:15 PM | I agree. If they could (Score:1)
mattbern
mattbern's picture
Joined: 09/11/2008
MGoPoints: 332

I agree. If they could really tell that it was a forward lateral, then how did it take them so long to make the call. They needed indisputable evidence, as you said, and clearly the evidence must have been disputable if it took them so long to find something that would say that the play should be overturned.

Anyway, this play was not the reason for us losing. We need to be able to maintain a lead in the second half and play some form of defense. There are still a lot of problems with this team, and they are not going to be solved by next week or the Ohio State game. Its gonna take some time and we gotta be patient...as much as being patient sucks.

You play to win the game

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:26 PM | Unfortunately (Score:1)
ppudge
Joined: 10/19/2008
MGoPoints: 204

I thought it was the correct call based on where Brown let the pitch go and where Huyge ended up catching it. Looked like he was in front of Brown where he caught it.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 5:08 PM | In all honesty I think that's (Score:1)
maizenbluedevil
maizenbluedevil's picture
Joined: 09/11/2008
MGoPoints: 2237

In all honesty I think that's literally, physically impossible.

Brown was falling on his back, feet toward the line of scrimmage, head toward the end zone.

Huyge was running forwards, towards the end zone, facing the end zone.

With the players oriented in those directions, it had to have been a backward (lateral) pass for Huyge to even be able to catch it, which he did. Witht the players in the positions they were, a forward pass would have hit Huyge in the back, or on the back side of his arm, or he would have had to completely turn his body to catch it, which he didn't.

That was a piss-poor call.

I agree w/ the above posters who said the play was so freakish, that the replay officials assumed their *had* to be shenanigans for it to have happened the way it did, and were just looking for some basis on which to overturn it.

Horrible, horrible officiating, negating what was a phenomenal heads-up play on the part of both Brown and Huyge.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:31 PM | I couldn't tell, personally, (Score:1)
mcberry
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 35

I couldn't tell, personally, if it was forward or not. Considering they gave it so much time, however, leads me to believe that the right call was made. Perhaps they have additional angles to look at? Or perhaps by viewing a certain combination of angles simultaneously, the indisputable result can be achieved.

At any rate, it is what it is. The officials did not cost us this one, regardless of that play.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:41 PM | It went forward. (Score:1)
MichiganAggie
MichiganAggie's picture
Joined: 11/10/2008
MGoPoints: 495

Pretty obvious it went forward. Hell of a play by Brown given the situation he was put in, but sadly the replay officials got it right

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:57 PM | Agreed (Score:1)
van
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1754

I'm pretty sure the pitch went forward. It's tough to accurately review a call like that because there's no camera angle that would definitely show whether it was forward or not.

I just wish the announcers would stop emphasizing that replay has to be indisputable, because both at College and in the Pros that's clearly not the standard being used.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 4:58 PM | I also would be inclined to (Score:1)
ZooWolverine
ZooWolverine's picture
Joined: 02/27/2009
MGoPoints: 266

I also would be inclined to believe it's legit to review that. It's certainly allowed when the ball is behind the line of scrimmage . . . I've seen many reviews that look at whether something was a fumble or an incomplete pass based on whether the screen went forwards or not, so I wouldn't be too surprised if they were allowed to review this too (though the addition of a penalty to the mix may mean it's a different situation).

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 5:16 PM | The NCAA rulebook is online. (Score:1)
TomW09
Joined: 12/18/2008
MGoPoints: 199

The NCAA rulebook is online. You can look it up for yourself. A lateral is reviewable to determine if it was an illegal forward pass. Obviously.

Note, I say obviously b/c that's what the officials ruled.

It's Great to Be A Michigan Wolverine

  • Login or register to post comments
November 7th, 2009 at 5:25 PM | I appreciate the answer, but (Score:1)
ZooWolverine
ZooWolverine's picture
Joined: 02/27/2009
MGoPoints: 266

I appreciate the answer, but how is that obvious? Something isn't clearly right because the officials say so . . . I mean, last year the officials used video evidence to rule that Minor was in bounds because he landed on a pylon.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.