Jeff DEEEEEEEFrans strong dislike of RR

Why does anyone spend time talking about sports talk radio on this board? It's fucking miserable. "OMG, BOB BOBSON at WPPZ just said RR is a meanie and a bad coach"  I don't want to hear about it. No one wants to hear about it. Don't spread that crap. We all have our own opinions on this board, and most of us support our football coach.

...but it is always good to know who is badmouthing UM and RR so that we can make learned decisions on whether, for example, to boycott those people.  As the old saying goes: "keep your friends close and your enemies closer."

Soooo...why did you just spend time talking about sports talk radio on this board then?

Why feel the need to get on your soap box? Yeah, he has his opinions, I have mmine. That's what this board is for. I just simply chose to bring up how joyful he is in his message.

Feel free to sjip these threads then if it'll make your lifeeasier. Thanks.

But you hear the same guys all the time.

Everyone's entitled to their opinion - except Defran.

Ok... Rosenburg doesn't get to voice his either.

NOTE:  Sarcasm on display here... just my opinion... wait I shouldn't have one either...  LoL

Hey Macomb, sports radio guys don't get paid to know about sports, the get paid to get people to listen and talk about the show.  I don't even know who this guy is, but it worked on you.  You hate him so much that you're giving him publicity on a highly-read sports blog. 

The reality of it is that unless you're winning national championships, someone will be talking about you getting fired.  Throw in some NCAA violations and it's a sure thing.  Until UM starts winning the Big Ten again, don't expect this to change. 

What's this guy going to say if Rodriguez stays? At least people on message boards can change their user names, Defran can't just get a new reputation over night. Same goes with all of the local media. 

They're painting themselves into a rhetorical pickle, either they eat crow and lose credibility or they stick to their guns that Rodriguez is a jerk and they'll never be able to get aligned with him.

I'm not saying not to report on legitimate news stories, but haven't these guys ever heard of plausible deniability?

Defran is incapable of analytical thinking.  His arguments (if you can call them that) are nonsensical and poorly thought out.  I find it is so frustrating to listen to him that I often turn the station over to Valenti.  I hate Valenti as well, but at least the dude has a sense of humor and some cognitive ability.  

He's the only one I listen to on college football.  He's funny, fairly objective, and has forgotten more about God's own sport then all of these local jerk-offs put together.

A question for the OP:

What the hell does "inobjective" mean? Please provide an unsubjective definition. 

the sound of his own voice too much.  He loves to spout off about how he has "inside information" and contacts "close" to the situation.  He proves the exception to the rule on the 1st Amendment.  Yes, everyone has a right to say what they want, short of threatening someone's life, but knuckleheads like DeFran like to get others going by trying to make opinions sound like facts.

I have yet to hear him "report" anything.  He's basically a radio "columnist" filling a slot where WTKA seems to be short on talent".  I'm surprised Copey doesn't go off on him about the BS he spews.  I learned to not turnon WTKA on Wednesdays and Thursdays after DeFran's rant in the winter.

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he thinks?

Has replaced waterboarding in favor of a 24 hour loop with the "best of Jeff DeFran" over the loud speakers. Homeland Security states the suicide rate in the prison is up but the color coded terror advisory is between blue and green.

So I'm not mistaken, aside from my spelling errors which have left some of you feeling sore, some of you have never and will never bring up or particpate in a thread about a writer, reporter or hosts opinions and/or comments that are timely and pertain to the subject that this web-site and board are based on?

The next time someone blatantly cuts the program or exhibits bias against it, I'm not supposed to bring it up with fellow fans on this board? Does this also apply to positive opinions?

Nobody had an opinion or wrote something here about Rosenberg, Sharp, Birckett, etc.?

I assume, since some ofyou have made your point, you will never feel the need to particpate in an open message board and thread about similar subjects.