Jameis Winston to Sit Entire Game vs Clemson
Looks like FSU has either gotten this right or bowed to media pressure or both. Either way we won't see Mr. Winston vs Clemson on saturday.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/11555354/jameis-winston-…
September 19th, 2014 at 11:38 PM ^
So are all punishments crowd sourced now?
September 20th, 2014 at 2:27 PM ^
He shouldn't be punished at all - it's a joke!
Word Police...
Should people be charged for the rap lyrics being blasted out their car windows?
September 19th, 2014 at 11:40 PM ^
I actually thought one half was appropriate. The guy stood up and yelled an obscenity, and now he has to miss one of the biggest games of the season?
Either way, FSU should have stuck with the original punishment becuase now it looks like they're just caving to public pressure.
September 20th, 2014 at 12:22 AM ^
Just how many times, exactly, should FSU cover for this upstanding citizen?
September 20th, 2014 at 12:30 AM ^
Don't get me wrong, I think Winston has escaped what should have been severe punishments for a variety of trasngressions over the course of his career. I'm just saying that for this particular incident, viewed in a vacuum, extending the suspension makes FSU look spineless.
September 20th, 2014 at 1:38 AM ^
Why can't it be viewed as part of Winston's known totality, much of which includes being a misongynist with an entitlement attitude?
Just a harmless prank some say. I wonder how harmless that prank would be if the pronoun "Her" was substituted by the name of a wife, daughter, sister, or mother?
September 20th, 2014 at 1:42 AM ^
"Why can't it be viewed as part of Winston's known totality, much of which includes being a misongynist with an entitlement attitude?"
I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. Could you be more specific?
September 20th, 2014 at 8:28 AM ^
Winston's behavior in this instance is not a continuation of the pattern of behavior alleged in connection with the rape.
Rape is a felony. If someone commits rape, that should disqualify him from participating in any activity that is a privilege (playing in a football game), at least for a time.
The other act isjust goofy ass behavior. I could see myself doing something like that during college given the right amount of alcohol. If anything, it shows that Winston does not realize or does not care the extent to which everything that he does is magnified. That will be one of many factors that NFL teams will consider when deciding whether to draft him, but I don't think that it warrants a suspension.
September 20th, 2014 at 10:21 AM ^
I agree. I don't think this "incident" warranted any suspension whatsoever. Are we really going to start supsending players for saying stupid sh*t in public? If so, get used to seeing lots of 3rd stringers on the field for teams across the country.
The alleged sexual misconduct surrounding Winston has no bearing on this issue. If he is guilty of whatever he is accused of, then I hope he rots in prison for a long time.
September 20th, 2014 at 1:51 AM ^
September 20th, 2014 at 8:22 AM ^
September 20th, 2014 at 10:16 AM ^
September 20th, 2014 at 2:39 PM ^
My view on his punishment is basically this: in isolation (for this incident only), this is a shockingly harsh penalty; in the context of the other stuff he's done, it seems like they need to get his sense of entitlement and invincibility under control. I'm undecided on whether they should be punishing just one incident here or sending a message.
September 20th, 2014 at 7:45 AM ^
People can make all the jokes they want, but in the end, I think many would've been fine with 1/2 a game if the mob wasn't running sports right now.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:44 PM ^
and yelled the same thing again to get the full game suspension.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:43 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 19th, 2014 at 11:47 PM ^
This comes off as a cumulative punishment to me. It's just too bad that it took FSU this long to send a message.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:49 PM ^
Everyone focuses on the sexual assault but there was also the crab legs, shooting the windows out in is apartment and now this.
There's a pattern developing, and until this point no one has done anything about it because he plays football.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:59 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2014 at 1:08 AM ^
I don't see what the big deal is about a couple of crab legs...
September 19th, 2014 at 11:51 PM ^
September 19th, 2014 at 11:59 PM ^
Exactly. People think the mob mentality is OK right now because the mob is stringing up "bad guys". But what happens when the mob turns and starts going after other people that might not be so cut and dried "bad"? Mob justice is never a good idea, not even in sports suspensions.
September 20th, 2014 at 12:08 AM ^
September 20th, 2014 at 12:31 AM ^
September 20th, 2014 at 7:16 AM ^
September 20th, 2014 at 12:23 AM ^
and then shouted out the meme he did. That alone warrants his suspension. Viewed in isolation yelling out what he did is not a reprehensible act. It sure as heck is, however, when you're accused of rape.
This isn't, or shouldn't be, about mob justice. It's about Winson being a moron.
If the actual mob that was close to Winston was given any power, Winston wouldn't be sitting for a second of the game tomorrow.
September 20th, 2014 at 12:41 AM ^
September 20th, 2014 at 12:45 AM ^
the point is that we've crossed a pretty serious line when the careers of people are determined not by inquiry or justice, but by the collective anger of a mob. Because, while you may have this issue right, you could get the next issue wrong.
I simply think someone 'up top' understands (or abides by, at least) Kantian ethics.
September 20th, 2014 at 12:54 AM ^
September 20th, 2014 at 1:21 AM ^
actions.
To which Kant would reply, if Winston is guilty, he deserves to be castigated. Period.
This isn't, or shouldn't be about, mob rule. It's about getting what he deserves.
September 20th, 2014 at 3:02 AM ^
Sorry to hear this. I know the name of a good gynecologist if you you're interested.
September 20th, 2014 at 12:53 AM ^
"the point is that we've crossed a pretty serious line when the careers of people are determined not by inquiry or justice, but by the collective anger of a mob."
Can you provide another example? It seems to me that punishments are still, for the most part, guided by financial and competitive considerations. If anything, the gap between what the public thinks is appropriate and what is actually doled out is wider than ever. See: NFL.
Also, how do you do that nifty yellow block quote?
September 20th, 2014 at 12:56 AM ^
<blockquote> paste text here </blockquote>
But click on the "switch to plain text editor" before you type the above. To find "switch to plain text editor" look to the bottom left of the text box.
September 20th, 2014 at 9:18 AM ^
Can you provide another example?The University of Illinois is currently subject to a boycott by thousands of professors, and about to be on the losing end of a lawsuit for firing an incoming professor over political speech on Twitter following pressure from off campus political activists. On a more directly relevant note, I don't think anybody to this point on the thread, as far down as I've read, has understood the real issue. Accused rapist Jameis Winston shouting what he shouted in University buildings is liable to create a seriously hostile environment for female students. I'd assume the decision to extend the suspension came down from FSU's legal team. Depending on where the existing investigation into the rape allegations stands, JW may now be on a somewhat faster track to expulsion.
September 20th, 2014 at 2:07 AM ^
the mob that dictates what if any punishment the respective league or team hands out. Professional players have morality clauses for a reason, the teams and league respect what potential righteous indignation the mob might have for a particular immoral act. If you take the mob out of the equation few if any off field issues would ever be addressed by teams and leagues unless said actions influenced on field play.
The mob is the customer, and when the customer is dissatified with the business and there is a loss of goodwill, the smart business owner does what it takes to make the customer satisfied. If that means tossing a few players out of the league for their immoral actions, so be it. If that means Winston has to sit an entire game, so be it.
September 20th, 2014 at 8:08 AM ^
Well, it's not public opinion that is *directly* moving the needle in such cases, but, rather, money (of which public opinion certainly plays a significant role). The NFL and NCAA have no legal authority here, and, only invoke "ethical/moral authority" when it is their business interest to do so. Specifically, when they do their calculations and determine that doing nothing or continuing to advocate for their star players will either (a) result in significant net revenue loss from sponsors, consumers, etc. and/or (b) open the league/team/university up to significant legal liability that's when they take their ethical/righteous stand.
<side note>
(As an aside, if one is to believe the OTL report from last night on the Rice/Ravens situation, the Ravens front office comes off looking *really* bad (John Harbaugh excepted). And, perhaps, have opened themselves up to obstruction of justice legal issues with regard to their potential interference with the handling of the case by Atlantic City police/prosecution.)
</side note>
The events of the recent weeks have put all this under the microscope, but, I expect it has always been this way (specifically, teams/leagues/universities doing the money calculations and basing such decisions on that). I think what is different about the current climate is the common existence of video and cell phone/text message evidence made available to the general public. Thus, it is much more difficult for commissioners, university presidents, etc. to sweep these things under the rug and make them go away.
Take away lesson to be learned for the athletes in a big money sport, more so now than ever, is that you need to stay out of trouble. Fair or not, not doing so can have a major, permanent impact on your career.
September 20th, 2014 at 7:58 AM ^
Why are we assuming it's the public pressure that made FSU extend the punishment? I think that's a fairly big leap to conclusions. Isn't it at least possible that Winston did something extra in between that made them extend it - sassed the coach, or whatever - and they just don't want to talk about it?
September 20th, 2014 at 2:13 PM ^
Reportedly, he lied, or mislead, or was less than forthcoming about this incident to FSU staff.
September 20th, 2014 at 9:11 AM ^
Ridiculous. Sad thing is, they'll still beat Clemson. And I'd wager pretty severely.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:51 PM ^
ESPN/SEC propaganda machine.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:52 PM ^
September 19th, 2014 at 11:53 PM ^
September 19th, 2014 at 11:57 PM ^
Yeah, I'm all for the public actually holiding people accountable and all that, but the reality is, people are, in general, never going to be satisfied with the discipline that is handed out unless it is quite heavy handed.
This seems like it was actually handled relatively appropriately by FSU to begin with and I don't see why they are changing course due to people complaining.
Personally I think the kid is a ticking time-bomb, and maybe if it were my team I would have suspended him for longer to begin with, but I don't think you hand out team suspensions via a Twitter or Facebook vote.
September 20th, 2014 at 2:11 AM ^
when ESPN and the other sporting news outlets spent the entire day discussing how spineless FSU has been and how they've enabled the growing monstrosity of Jameis Winston.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:57 PM ^
Why are there so many more horse's asses than horses?
September 20th, 2014 at 12:04 AM ^
Centaurs.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:59 PM ^
Should've suspended him for the season and then let the public plead him down to one half.
September 20th, 2014 at 12:09 AM ^
Rape allegations = nothing. Saying "fuck" and "pussy" = 1 game. Interesting...