Ryanonymous

April 10th, 2015 at 3:15 PM ^

Both are the same height and can move around in the pocket enough to keep defenses honest. Rudock is slightly more mobile though.
Both have similar deliveries except Henne has maybe slightly more arm strength but really winds up in order to heave it where Jake has a slightly quicker release.
Both are token game manager types however, Henne had some real weapons to work with and a better scheme to work within than did Rudock at Iowa. This allowed Henne to obviously do a bit more than just manage games.

Here's to hoping that Rudock can be as successful in his one year here as Henne the senior was, minus the Horror.

Bonus video: http://youtu.be/bR2b2BI6sxg

corundum

April 10th, 2015 at 4:07 PM ^

I'm going to respectfully disagree here. Henne had an absolute cannon and was always looking to throw the ball deep or downfield. When he wasn't injured, Henne was a gamechanger. He had a completion percentage under 60 and threw almost 40 picks while at Michigan because he was confident and took risks. How many times do you remember Henne getting sacked because he was waiting for something deep to open up? Rudock is not a gambler, he loves short passes/check-downs, and is the epitome of a game manager.

Danwillhor

April 11th, 2015 at 5:59 AM ^

Henne had one of the strongest arms in the country when healthy. Absolute cannon. Even with video I can't say anything concretely about Rudock but I don't think they are very similar at all. Jake seems like the types listed above (ever Wisconsin & Iowa QB ever lol) while Henne was a few more QB IQ points from being an NFL franchise QB. Henne had all the physical tools but that doesn't always equal wins it even good QB play. As above, no knock on Rudock as I'd be ecstatic to have him be a guy that didn't necessarily have the physical gifts but takes care of the ball & doesn't lose games for us. Let's be honest here: QB play cost us games the last few years. Just a fact. Our defense was good enough to keep us in a lot if games we would have outright lost or never had a chance to win due to QB play. If Rudock (or any other QB) & this staff can keep our offense from losing games for us I think we should hit about 7-8 wins in year one. If not? I see a lot more of last year.

LSAClassOf2000

April 10th, 2015 at 3:17 PM ^

Fisch explained earlier in spring camp that his biggest goal was to get Michigan's quarterbacks to value the football and understand the importance of simply completing passes and moving the team down the field as a "point guard."

I think this is where the leadership and experience that Rudock brings definitely comes in handy, if this is how he has them looking at it. You're getting someone who has shown this in game scenarios - meaningful games too - so Fisch and Rudock hopefully impart that to everyone else. 

getsome

April 10th, 2015 at 9:19 PM ^

they dont have the difference makers to really seperate outside and win downfield, at least not yet or vs solid Ds - kind of tough to trash checking it down or working the intermediate pass game when thats all your roster currently able to do.  

hopefully theyll improve and demonstrate otherwise - obviously harbaugh will get it going given enough time / roster turnover, but current roster is not exactly terrifying opposing DCs

Sam1863

April 10th, 2015 at 4:30 PM ^

If Rudock turns out to be the kind of QB that puts the ball where his receivers can catch it, moves the chains, throws the ball away instead of taking a sack, can scramble out of trouble when necessary, and above all, doesn't shoot himself in the foot, I'll gladly take it.

That's a QB who puts his team in a position to win. If that's what Rudock turns out to be, I'll be thrilled.

getsome

April 10th, 2015 at 9:25 PM ^

griese has been one of the rare "game manager" types to win championship - it typically takes elite QB play (along with everything else).  

but griese had pros in front of him, behind him, and outside.  and the D was stacked with future pros as well.  that team had what, 35 dudes eventually play in NFL?   kind of a tough comparison to rudock and this current roster

BlueMD1927

April 10th, 2015 at 5:24 PM ^

We're gonna ned him to in order to have any success on offense this year. The oline is MAC level at best, the only decent rb on the team is a transfer, and Ruddock is the only Non freshmam qb that's worthy of a Michigan offer....so he better treat the pigskin like golf or it could be a long long long season

CoverZero

April 10th, 2015 at 5:26 PM ^

Sadly I agree with your assessment of the offensive talent level.  Everyone talks about how well Hoke supposedly recruited, but offensively the majority of his recruits have had non-descript to putrid careers so far.  Its a wonder, because several of them were highly ranked. 

BlueMD1927

April 10th, 2015 at 5:36 PM ^

Home was terrible and a complete
embarrassment to the football program. He only did two good things his entire tenure here as the head coach.....kick Frank Clark off the team and keep the head coach'a chair warm for Harbaugh. Can't say there's any other reason why I'm glad Hoke ever stepped foot in Ann Arbor after he left in 1998

In reply to by BlueMD1927

EGD

April 11th, 2015 at 12:38 AM ^

Hoke also graduated most, if not all, of his seniors. He rebuilt the defense into a formidable unit, from the shambles GERG left behind. He actually defeated Ohio State and won a BCS bowl, lucky as those occurrences might have been. Yeah, he did some dumb stuff and ultimately failed at Michigan--but 'a complete embarrassment" is a bit excessive.

Avon Barksdale

April 10th, 2015 at 6:54 PM ^

Devin was awful. Really awful. He was a broken QB. Even when there wasn't pressure he was latched onto Gallon/Funchess. Also, he never put the ball in stride. Every catch was difficult.

If Rudock can be a 20 TD, 5 INT type and put the ball on receivers, we should be OK offensively.