So my buddy calls me Friday and he tells me that the "insider"(not sure if it was scout or rivals) sent a practice note out that Gallon was taking snaps at qb in a wildcat package and they say the reason is that he runs the read option better than Denard and Tate.
We waste 10 minutes of our companies times debating the validity of this. We finally settle on this report is insane and makes no sense. Of course that same note was up here and a poster nailed it with with his scout team theory. Sure enough 2 days later RR tells the media Gallon is the scout team qb.
How bad do the pay sites look with this info?
1. If their leak actually got to see practice, then he knows nothing about football because they couldn't figure he was on the scout team, if it was told to them 2nd hand then how many other times do they just screw with these guys and send them dog shit.
2. It appears they just made up the part about the read option, because if Gallon never took snaps how is he going to be better than Denard at running it. What else do they make up?
I know this is just 1 example and everyone makes mistakes, but this is so bad it makes you wonder especially when I look back and I remember hearing about Vlad solidifying the FS position etc in fall practice...