How 4-3 defenses are evolving to stop the smashmouth spread

Submitted by Ali G Bomaye on

Interesting article from Football Study Hall that made me think of our collective horror at Durkin's refusal to adjust during the Ohio State game last year.  It also focuses pretty significantly on how MSU has gotten shredded by spread teams.  And surprise, part of the solution involves having a lockdown corner on one side, which we just happen to have.

http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2016/5/12/11656452/how-4-3-defenses-are-evolving-to-stop-the-smashmouth-spread

BassDude138

May 12th, 2016 at 1:59 PM ^

That game was more of a "perfect storm" in my opinion. Yes, unfortunately OSU was the better team. What turned it into a blowout was a combo of injuries depleting the depth on the D-line, the lack of speed at LB, and Durkin having a poor game plan/ not adjusting. I still believe that he had already checked out before that game. Put all of those factors together, then add in the fact that sparty embarrassed them at home the week before, and it was not pretty. I expect a much more prepared and hungry Michigan team this year in Columbus.

Wolfman

May 12th, 2016 at 8:23 PM ^

woung tighter than a 12 hour clock after Urb gave the game to the Sparties the week before. I think OSU had to ttravel less than 15 yds for their two scoring drives in that game.

And we didn't have the players to matchf up. I was hoping they would have rolled Sparty by 50 and expecting the same result against us. But they played like they did in the playoffs last season and when we lost our one D1 qb - Speight is legit this season, but didn't have the reps and Harbaugh really didn't have the time for on-one-one time with him. Jake needed it all. When he went down game over, and that is the  reason for 13 imo,. You saw Bosa that game. He as actually Joey Bosa again.

gopoohgo

May 12th, 2016 at 11:11 AM ^

I blame personnel. 

Losing Glasgow really impacted the defense's ability to stop the run (the Indiana horror show, and OSU).  With Mone out the entire season, required folks to shift out of position, and they got ground down.

Going up against NFL caliber offensive lineman, RBs in both of those games, as well as our ILB problems..

Mr Miggle

May 12th, 2016 at 3:50 PM ^

I don't know how to explain not adjusting during that game. Maybe it was beyond my ability to recognize it. We had to anticipate OSU would try the same attack. As far as I could tell, we met it in the same way that largely failed vs IU. i understand that the missing players affected our defense's effectiveness. I still find it hard to believe our personnel was so limited that we couldn't make adjustments.

Wolfman

May 12th, 2016 at 8:16 PM ^

If you will recall that impressive sting of shutouts was ended and teams began to have lots of success when first Glasgow went down and then later Mario, who  imo get's overlooked a lot. I thought he was having one hell of a year. And as much as I respect the two backers - they were bright and they were fighters - they were also very, very limited. Our DL kept lead blockers off them until they started falling. Yes we were thin as hell.

If you look back at the IU game, I think far too people realize Peppers won that game for us on third down. Instincts and reaction cannot be overrated. Many - and they are envious - I see no other reason for it, say he is living off high school press clippings. Yeah, ok. But he saw the play, didn't hesitate and actually left his feet to  meet the big runner about a yd in the backfield.

And instead of 4th and less than one they were hoping for, they had to pass and the defender could not have done a better job. But it was Peppers who changed their last play call. f

 

Space Coyote

May 12th, 2016 at 1:46 PM ^

It's a combination of both. There were schematic reasons, there were personnel reasons, there were preperation reasons, there were implementation reasons, etc.

But I do think it's important to remember couple things:

1) People throw out "Indiana" like it's the Indiana of yore. While their offense wasn't the best ever, it was still Top 25 by almost all measures, and one of the best in the B1G. They gashed a lot of good defenses. They only scored less than 26 once all season, and put up 34 on Michigan in regulation. Yes, they seemingly ran the ball again and again and again, but Michigan's defense wasn't really an anomoly against a good Indiana offense.

2) OSU's offense wasn't the same offense as it was before that game. They revamped everything after the horrid gameplan against MSU, and it showed against both Michigan and ND in the bowl game. Again, Michigan's performance was not good, but they did manage to hold OSU to 14 first half points, and got caught on the bad end of half time adjustments in the 2nd half. It happens against good teams (or teams that should be great but for some reason weren't up until that point). 

So yes, the issues were multifaceted. But I still think people slightly over react to those instances. Michigan's defense was never as good as the three shutouts in a row indicated, because those were great matchups for Michigan. But it wasn't nearly as bad as those two performances showed either.

SCarolinaMaize

May 12th, 2016 at 11:22 AM ^

Losing Glasgow was huge.  Messed up the sub packages and OSU could keep the matchups they liked on the field.  Could Durkin have adjusted?  Maybe, one of the other, more Xs & Os posters could probably give us some alternatives, but I think they just got caught with the wrong personnel at crucial times.

I remember when Martin was down, the whole defense seemed to regress a bit.  Same situation with Glasgow IMO.  Molk on the other side as well.

UMCoconut

May 12th, 2016 at 11:46 AM ^

I think losing Glasgow was a huge blow.  We didn't have him for either of the power spread teams we played (Indiana, OSU), and both ran roughshod over us.  It's possible that we would have struggled just as much with him, but I doubt it.  I think having him and Mone both back to plug up the middle and disrupt the interior of the OL will be a huge boon for us.  Of course, a lockdown corner, some athletic rush DEs and Peppers roaming will likely be just as impactful.

ak47

May 12th, 2016 at 12:01 PM ^

People like to blame Durkin for that game but if you want to talk halftime adjustments our offense didn't do any better.  3 second half points at home isn't a great look. Harbuagh got just as outcoached on the offensive side of the ball as durkin did on the defensive.  That team was just better than us in every way and played up to their potential.  Their oline was better than our depleted dline, their qb and rb were better than our lb's and safeties were at stopping the run, their dline was better than our oline, their lb's were better than our rb's.  Every level of the team got beat.  Looking forward to a better showing this year.

Everyone Murders

May 12th, 2016 at 11:21 AM ^

The OP is right, you need a lock-down corner and we've got one.  Also, you need good pressure and athleticism from your DE's. 

Hey, we got that too!  I am looking forward to next season maybe more than any season in recent memory.  If our QB-whisperer maniac coach can work his magic again, both sides of the ball will be in great shape.

Great article, OP.  Thanks for posting.

/ breathes into brown paper bag /

Space Coyote

May 12th, 2016 at 2:01 PM ^

But slightly disagree with a rather simplified (likely purposefully) proposal here.

Here's the comment I wrote on the actual article

Part of the problem, however, is that today’s defenses cannot afford to be predictable. Once you are predictable, you will get exploited. So I don’t think the answer is as simple as a schematic change, but more nuanced and involving communication changes to be able to adjust on the fly.

Here a post I wrote about Illinois running RPOs against OSU’s solo coverage and how OSU adjusted. So it can exploit any coverage really. But being able to tweak the defense on the fly is what forces the QB to think and delays his reads. That gives the defense an advantage again and puts the QB is a losing situation. In my opinion, that’s the solution more than just a schematic change.

I think improved DL play is also essential. Good, run defending DL allow the LBs and DBs to be freed up and forces the run play to develop before hitting down hill. Strong DLs that beat the OL still win the day.

Cranky Dave

May 12th, 2016 at 2:15 PM ^

Discussed on the board before by Space Coyote, Magnus and maybe other coaches. My recollection is their view was that adjustments on defense would have slowed OSU's offense but not stopped it.

We are back

May 12th, 2016 at 11:25 PM ^

I'm not a defensive guru or claim to be I'm an offensive coach, I didn't read the article but after reading the comments about the OSU game, my adjustment would have been man across the board with a spy on Elliot (Dymonte) and a spy on Barrett (Peppers). I realize this would have opened up the pass game for OSU but I'd rather them beat me through the air then run all over me. Defensive pressure is the killer in man to man coverage we couldn't get a rush to save our lives which would allow their WR to run their long fake routes to get open which would have happened. So basically my belief we had no chance at stopping them.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

JOHNNAVARREISMYHERO

May 13th, 2016 at 3:03 AM ^

The few amount of passes they threw, we couldn't stop.  The game was just a clusterfuck of not being prepared and just plain horrific coaching, tackling, effort, etc.      

Trying to block that punt set the tone for the shitshow that ensued. 

To top it off, we blocked a meaningless punt later in the game when the game was long over and Speight looked clueless at QB.  

schreibee

May 14th, 2016 at 1:32 AM ^

Ok, unless Navarre saved your Mother or little brother from a fire, m I hate your user name... guy caused me more gastric upset than almost any other Michigan player I can name. That being said, I agree with everything you said, and feel the love of Baxter was very myopic. We made some crucial mistakes in punt block attempts throughout the season. People are so ingrained in disregarding Special Teams they've forgotten the miscues in that aspect to instead debate the O or D lapses. You need them all. Vs osu we had none. Moving on, let's take it to em in Columbus in November!