Honest Analysis of Michigan - Ohio State 2008 and 2009

Submitted by Tom_Harmon 2.0 on

One of the hardest things to do, in any competitive activity, is to take a look back at the times when you did not prevail, when that awesome pass play just didn't fool their secondary, when the bad guys won, even yet again.  Michigan - Ohio State 2008 and 2009 were two of those moments that tested the Wolverine faithful.

In the interest of helping us better understand these losses, I analyzed these games with the following purposes in mind:

--How much of the blame has to go to the coaches, and how much to the players?  To recruiting?  To luck?

--How can we better prepare ourselves, physically and psychologically, for the next time we play Ohio State?

--What IS OSU's offensive identity?  What is the 'rhyme and reason', if you will, to the way they move the football?  Conversely, what is Michigan's offensive identity in the RR era?

README:  If you, the reader, find factual or analytical errors in my analysis, or if you flat out disagree with some or all of my ideas, please express your disagreement through written comments and not neg-banging.  We all have to work together if we are to understand these games and better prepare ourselves for the future.  Also, I recommend muting the sound when you watch the clips, for obvious reasons.  On to the analysis.

***

Michigan - OSU 2008: The Culling

Score at Halftime: 14-7 OSU

Score at End: 42-7 OSU

Clip Web Address:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abDUqqcX7rA

Notes on OSU offense:

--Tressel loves to run Beanie Wells behind the left guard. Whether Wells is running behind the LG as lead blocker or the LG pulls and blocks a LB on the right side of the OL, that seems to be the way that OSU likes to move the ball.
--Incidentally, Wells breaks 40 yards for a TD at 2:00. The commentators remark at 2:05 "...it was the 4th or 5th time they ran the play and it wasn't working...then it worked." Classic Big Ten power football. </sarcasm>
--Pryor can throw the deep ball pretty well, but his short passing game is suspect, to say the least. I'm surprised Tressel didn't have him run more in this game.

Notes on Todd Boeckman, the OSU Quarterback Not Named Terrelle Pryor:

--Boeckman was a 6th year(!) senior in 2008. He started in 2007, throwing for 2,375 yards and 25 touchdowns. At the NC game vs. LSU in January 2008, he threw for 208 yards, 2 TDs, and 2 INTs. The Buckeyes lost 38-24.
--Boeckman was the starter in 2008, until the Buckeyes lost to USC 35-3. Then Pryor was the starter for the remainder of the season.
--Boeckman's throwing motion at 8:38 does not impress me.
--Boeckman threw a touchdown pass to Terrelle Pryor vs. Texas in the 2009 Alamo Bowl.
--Boeckman entered the draft and tried to play football at the professional level. He was cut from the Jacksonville Jaguars' roster on September 5, 2009.

Notes on Michigan 2008 FAIL:

--Here are some of the many Michigan chokes in this game:
Cissoko fumbles two kickoffs. KC Lopata misses a field goal. Odoms fumbles a punt. Sheridan has no mobility and none of his receivers are open. McGuffie fumbles a kickoff.
--Michigan's defense WAS a little undersized in this game. Attrition had cut down depth to razor-thin levels and Michigan was starting walk-ons at key positions. (Bear in mind, Michigan was starting walk-ons at safety as far back as 2005; this was hardly a new development.)
--Incidentally, RR's first recruiting class was heavily geared towards the offensive side of the ball, which did not help either.

Rays of Hope for Michigan Fans:


--Minor has a nice run at 3:36, setting up the only Michigan touchdown of the afternoon. This run comes off of a zone-read play which is the core of RR's running game. (See Smart Football or MGoBlog for details.) The OL and the RBs execute the play well a few times in this game. The problem was that there were so many duds at skill positions in 2008, the players were undersized, there was a new head coach installing a new offensive system, and there was a new defensive coordinator, who was fired after the 2008 season. But GERG Robinson made it back for the 2010 season, thank God.
--For all the talk about Michigan's 2008 defense as the worst in school history, the score is only 14-7 against M at the half. If the offense in 2008 were capable of putting any sort of pressure on OSU, the second half of this game would have been very different.
--Michigan's secondary was a lot better in the first half. Apparently the LBs forgot how to plug holes in the DL and/or cover passes. Tackling and blocking technique breaks down in a huge way too.
--Zoltan Meszko is still the Space Emperor.

***

Michigan - OSU 2009: Hey Look, We Got New Uniforms!

Score at Halftime: 14-10 OSU

Score at End: 21-10 OSU

Clip Web Address:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeKKSRR-O2I

Notes on the OSU offense:

--OSU seems to use four main routes for Pryor and their running backs: Behind the LG, behind the RG, and bootlegs around Michigan's defensive line.
--Pryor is not a great pocket passer. He has decent running speed, but his real strength is his ability to dodge tackles. Dernard Robinson is much faster than Pryor.
--Without Beanie Wells, the OSU running game is considerably less dangerous.

Notes on the Michigan offense:

--Michigan's quarterbacks are radically faster and much more accurate then their 2008 counterparts.
--Forcier is pretty decent in the pocket. Another year of conditioning to work on his accuracy/range and he'll look like Tom Brady.
--Michigan's offense looks much more like a RR offense: i.e. run-based with lots of screen passes and quick throws to the flat.
--Tate Forcier threw three interceptions and fumbled in the end zone in this game. Without that, Michigan wins this game. There, I said it.

Notes on the Michigan defense:

--There are still a lot of problems with tackling technique.
--Michigan's DBs are considerably improved from their 2008 counterparts: Instead of giving up 20-30 yards when an OSU back breaks free, they now give up 5-15 yards.
--Michigan's starting defensive players put on ~10-20 pounds each in the postseason thanks to strength and conditioning coach Mike Barwis. The huge mismatches from 2008 are all but gone. 2010 should be even better for the defense.
--No more deep bombs for Pryor! :)

Miscellaneous notes:

--Olesnavage misses a field goal at 1:40 and makes a field goal at 2:40.
--Considerably fewer fumbles and muffed punts. Good work, special teams.
--Greg Matthews had a huge day. He also stood tall against Notre Dame earlier that year.
--Vincent Smith makes me happy at 5:30. Dodging two DBs for a touchdown is more like the Michigan I remember.
--Score at halftime: 14-10 OSU. This is better than 2008.
--Score at the end: 21-10 OSU. This is better than 2008.
--Roy Roundtree definitely has potential. He sets up Forcier beautifully at 7:20. All he needs to do is work on his speed and that would have been a touchdown for Michigan.

Tom_Harmon 2.0

June 1st, 2010 at 6:29 PM ^

I'll be sure to include this article on my resume when I'm applying there for a job.  I'll try to make my analyses briefer in the future; I gotta admit I can rarely make it a quarter of a way into one of Brian's UFRs.  But I do like his 'Heroes/Goats/What Does This Mean' etc. at the end, and I was trying to reproduce some of that writing style.  Srsly though, thanks for the feedback.

joeyb

June 1st, 2010 at 3:55 PM ^

I checked the last line to make sure that I wasn't going to get Bel-Air'd. It's Bel-Air safe.

I honestly don't get why anyone would want to go back and watch one of the OSU games of the last 3 years, let alone two.

ambamb

June 1st, 2010 at 4:55 PM ^

Normaly should only be attempted with plenty of quality beer available. Upon completing, switch over to a replay of the 1969 game which is available on demand on WOW.

blueblueblue

June 1st, 2010 at 4:58 PM ^

Before I set aside 3 hours to read your post, can you remind me of, or point me to, all the dishonest analyses of those games? Therefore I might be able to understand why, just why you ask all this time and energy of us. 

Tom_Harmon 2.0

June 1st, 2010 at 6:25 PM ^

Sure.  Anyone who says that RR should be fired right here, right now doesn't know what he or she is talking about and by definition, those analyses would be less 'honest' than mine.  (I must admit the 'honest' tag was more rhetorical than anything.)  As for why I ask all this energy of you, I would reply that informed fans are the antidote for inane sportswriters pushing this personal agenda or that.  The quicker you and I can say, "This guy doesn't know what he/she is talking about," the better, because there's an awful lot of garbage writing floating around out there, and not just for sports.

.ghost.

June 1st, 2010 at 6:59 PM ^

Not sure why people are jumping down your throat on this one.  I enjoyed reading your post as much as possible considering the topic.  I really think that the only thing keeping us from beating OSU is the massive talent disparity that has plagued us in the past few years.  While I don't think we are nearly as talented as OSU, I think that it's obvious that the gap has shrunk quite a bit.  And I also have faith that Rodriguez is just the man for the job when it comes to finally cutting through OSU's stalwart D.  If that happens, I don't think Tressel has the offensive explosiveness to keep up. 

With all that said, I also think OSU will beat us worse this year than they did last year.  I hate to be pessimistic, but I really think they will be hot this year (as long as Pryor is halfway decent, which he should be).