The current group of recruits has moved us to #21 in Rivals rankings. Need one more to maybe get us into the Top 20.
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/recruiting/teamrank/2011/all/all
so much for that
The Hoke20 Move Us to #21
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:48 PM
#1
The Hoke20 Move Us to #21
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:49 PM | 
Cool.
Cool.
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:21 PM |
What was the point in
What was the point in
What was the point in that?
Please remember that we were in the 40s a couple weeks ago .
Oh-oh oh-oh oh-oh Here comes the ban hammer.
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:51 PM |
Funny
Funny
How everyone rips on rivals then uses there rating system to get excited about our players rank and our class rank.
Oh how I hate ohio state...
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:51 PM |
Considering....
Considering....
.....the uncertain state of affairs just a few short weeks ago, #21 isn't a bad recovery from near catastrophe.
"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."
Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:51 PM |
Because everyone knows...
Because everyone knows...
There's a huge difference between the 21st ranked class and the 20th ranked class.
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:57 PM |
I actually prefer the number 21
I actually prefer the number 21
for obvious reasons.
Time is working funny again. Greg Mattison has a phonebooth time machine he sent the secondary back to Charles Woodson's childhood in; they have emerged with ZZ Top beards, children, and skills.-BC
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:21 PM |
Because that's how old you
Because that's how old you
Because that's how old you were when you first hugged a girl?
ZING!
Just kidding.
I know you're referring to Barry Sanders.
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:01 PM |
Am I missing something?
Am I missing something?
Could've sworn Barry was 20.
Most Impressive: Has Excellent Ball Skills.
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:45 PM |
(No subject)
(No subject)
successfully achieved 1 year self-imposed posting ban 4/10/13
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:52 PM |
+ 8
+ 8
+ 8
"Tequila on the reg, chicks on the reg, fashions on the reg. Living the life most men can only dream of" - Kenny Powers
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:56 PM |
Holy crap, #20 S Carolina!!
Holy crap, #20 S Carolina!!
Holy crap, #20 S Carolina!! 33 signed???
For my privacy, my new username is "non-Oriental non-Andrew"
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:01 PM |
For some reason, I thought
For some reason, I thought
For some reason, I thought Steve Spurrier wouldn't be an oversigner. Apparently not.
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:57 PM |
Only 20 signed
Only 20 signed
I was going to say that's great considering we only signed 20, but then I see Florida @ 13 with 18 signed.
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:00 PM |
This class should leave us
This class should leave us
This class should leave us with around 3 scholarships banked for next year? Not sure but that is my guess after what I have been hearing around here the last few weeks.
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:13 PM |
No banked. Just means we have
No banked. Just means we have
No banked. Just means we have 85 if Williams and Watson return. Grady and Kovacs also keep theirs. Our 2012 class sits at 15 to start. Will probably stretch to 20 through attrition.
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:09 PM |
If you look at the avg. star
If you look at the avg. star
If you look at the avg. star rating in both Rivals (#20) and Scout (#18).
So, considering only signing 20 keeps our overall score down, looking to average stars per recruit is a better measure of talent per recruit rather than overall class.
Class of '97: 4 Years -- 4 Four-loss seasons
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:24 PM |
FWIW
FWIW
A quick glance places us 20th in terms of average star rating.
Edit - Sorry for the redundant post.
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:12 PM |
defensive ranking?
defensive ranking?
I would love to see where our class ranks defensively. We had a highly ranked offense last year, with few positions of need and little focus in this class. I am certain our defensive class ranks closer to top 10 which is huge considering our needs on D.
*** This line intentionally left blank ***
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:15 PM |
I hate USC
I hate USC
That is all.
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:32 PM |
Due to me being super lazy
Due to me being super lazy
Due to me being super lazy and not looking myself, anyone know what the class rankings are on the other services...ESPN, Scout, etc.?
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:34 PM |
Due to me being super lazy
Due to me being super lazy
Due to me being super lazy and not looking myself, anyone know what the class rankings are on the other services...ESPN, Scout, etc.?
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:00 PM |
We are, in fact, #20 if you
We are, in fact, #20 if you
We are, in fact, #20 if you go by average star ranking, and #3 in the Big Ten (#4 if you want to count ND) by that measure.
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:12 PM |
Uhhh ... nd is not in the B1G, so they don't count
Uhhh ... nd is not in the B1G, so they don't count
for anything ! nd gave the B1G the "finger" ... it is high time we left them out of anything related to this board (except when we play them). They need to join the Big East, with their BB team. They might have a chance to finish in the top 3 in the Big East. They would fail miserably in the B1G.
Go Blue !
No place on earth I'd rather be on a football Saturday than Michigan Stadium !
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:07 PM |
Bulletin board material for the Class of 2011
Bulletin board material for the Class of 2011
According to the ESPNU coverage, Michigan's class is rated as 8th best in the B1G !
That's right behind every team except Minnesota, Purdue and Indiana. Hopefully Brady posts this for this incoming class. They need a chip on their shoulder to make fools of the ESPN rankings. In fact the entire team needs to have "chip" to prove something to the entire college football world. Arghhh ... I am so ready, its time to make a statement in the B1G.
Go Blue !
No place on earth I'd rather be on a football Saturday than Michigan Stadium !
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:44 PM |
ESPNU kind of lost me when
ESPNU kind of lost me when
ESPNU kind of lost me when they ranked this team behind such illustrious programs such as NW and Illinois.
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:43 PM |
(No subject)
(No subject)
disregard, posted on the wrong reply.
successfully achieved 1 year self-imposed posting ban 4/10/13
February 2nd, 2011 at 6:43 PM |
Good to see Clemson ranked so
Good to see Clemson ranked so
Good to see Clemson ranked so high, since it will make it that much sweeter when they go 8-5 every year. That school recruits so well for being so immensely mediocre.
February 2nd, 2011 at 7:24 PM |
Classic hoke at it again
Classic hoke at it again
Classic hoke at it again
"When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing."
Cool.