Hockey snowflake thread

Submitted by ThadMattasagoblin on

It's time for Red to retire. Great guy and great coach for us for two decades however no one can be as good when they're pushing 80 as they were when they were 55. We're most likely not going to have a line like this again and we still lost to Ohio State twice, MSU, and tied Wisconsin twice this year while not winning the big ten regular season. Wiseman also can't be the guy as he's done nothing here to warrant being coach. 

stephenrjking

March 26th, 2016 at 9:16 PM ^

A pity you didn't watch any others. North Dakota is truly a terrific team; Michigan had trouble with them. But against teams Michigan matched up well against, they were delightful to watch. Never a complete team, which is why I thought a national title was a bridge too far this season, but a blast nonetheless.

stephenrjking

March 26th, 2016 at 10:20 PM ^

North Dakota is right there.

And, importantly, has better history recently. A majority of our national titles occurred before 1960. That doesn't make them illegitimate, and they look just as good in the rafters, but North Dakota has unquestionably been stronger in more recent decades. It makes sense when you ask yourself which program status you would choose as our own between Notre Dame and Alabama; ND has more history, Alabama is great and is a lot better in recent vintage.

If Michigan were far and away the destination program in college hockey, we would have a lot of these great players that go play for other teams.

BornSinner

March 26th, 2016 at 10:15 PM ^

Firstly, I'm not vouching for hiring UND's coach. Secondly, it's not like Red is leaving this program in shambles. 

Michigan is in a prime spot to get a solid hire, better than most schools can do given the program history/resources. 

That can't be denied imo. 

stephenrjking

March 26th, 2016 at 10:13 PM ^

We are *A* crown jewel, but on hockey-only terms, North Dakota has a better arena, better fan support (ours is good, theirs is bananas), and is the top team in their athletic department. They sit astride a remarkable recruiting field that both offers quality access to western Canada and close proximity to poach some of the best players from Minnesota, the top source for amateur players in the country, yet rarely has to compete with the WHL for players the way Michigan has to fight with the OHL.

It's no shame to Michigan to recognize these things. We are, frankly, fortunate that North Dakota hasn't won a title in 16 years. They could very easily be tied with us, and might get closer this season.

 

 

gwkrlghl

March 26th, 2016 at 10:25 PM ^

North Dakota struggles to breakthrough in the tournament even worse than us. If they played the tournament in a best of blank format, they'd probably have added several more national titles since they last won in 2000. They're an exceptional program in an exceptional recruiting position

ChicagoBigHouse

March 26th, 2016 at 9:19 PM ^

I was at the game tonight. UND was damn good and controlled the puck and seemed as though they won every face off. I was hoping we would get ahead with a flukey goal, but it never happened.

The Michigan fans made some high pitch noise every time Michigan cleared the puck during a penalty kill. Not something I have ever heard before.

Compher played great, so did Racine. Kile had a few great plays.

Downing did downing things unfortunately. There just seemed no way to get in the UND zone with any possession.

I don't know enough about hockey to say why this happened, definitely would like to hear from those who know more.

King Douche Ornery

March 26th, 2016 at 9:30 PM ^

It looked to me like Michigan held their own in the faceoff department.

I suspect you were nowhere near the arena in which the game was played, but since you want to play--

Downing was not bad--no one Michigan player was "bad" and no one player played "great"

What did happen--and by the way Kile was completely neutralized, as was Werenski--is that Michigan ran into a much better team, a much more prepared team, and a team that know HOW to combat everything Michigan does--which, to be honest, really isn't much.

If ANY player on this Michigan team leaves early to go pro--except Werenski or Compher--it's a huge mistake.

gwkrlghl

March 26th, 2016 at 10:00 PM ^

It started at Yost either in the 08-09 or 09-10 seasons I think on a St Pattys weekend game. I'm pretty proud of that one because it's a Yost original. Some guy just started doing it every time we cleared it on the PK and everyone else picked it up over the next few games

And my personal take on the game is that we fought well against a team clearly better than us. We've looked far worse against far worse competition this year. The metal lapses were still there (both turnovers leading to both initial goals), but for all their imperfections they fought hard these last two games and went out honorably. It is what it is. Easiest season end I've ever seen

BlueFish

March 27th, 2016 at 12:49 AM ^

Technically, "woop woop" is not a Yost original. It dates back to Larry Murphy and his time with the Caps. He had a reputation for (whoops) making bonehead plays, which compelled the impatient Caps fans to make the catcall when he touched the puck after leaving the Caps. Its adoption at Yost may have been organic, but it wasn't original. In fact, only a fraction of the cheers at Yost are original to Yost.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Doc Brown

March 26th, 2016 at 9:45 PM ^

How about you quit drinking and go to bed. I have season tickets and watched every game of this team. Heck I don't think I have missed more than 5 in the least decade. This year has been our best since 2011. Sure there are things we could have done better from forechecking to our d men actually clearing the puck and protecting Racine.

stephenrjking

March 26th, 2016 at 9:57 PM ^

Not sure if I should bother arguing with someone who just wants to flame, but I'm trying to look past your points total, since I was in a similar spot not long ago:

You're not getting negged and flamed because you're annoyed that someone who has watched only one game is underwhelmed. I mean, I get that, I've been there. My wife and I were sitting at the Joe at the 2004 CCHA championship, watching a rather talented Michigan team get cleanly beaten by an Ohio State team playing their third game in three days. Thing is, OSU was playing an incredible game more than Michigan was spitting the bit. The thing that annoyed me was the jerk behind me who kept whining that he drove from Howell to the game to see a hockey team he had never seen once before the entire season, and griping about how terrible the players were because they weren't producing the way he thought they should for his benefit. And he was spilling beer everywhere.

It was obnoxious and selfish and I, as someone who had seen that team play in person something like 30 times that season, found his cruel behavior toward them offensive.

So I get it.

Your opinion isn't the issue; your choice to be a jerk about it is. If you bothered to think about what you wrote and actually compose posts in a reasonable manner, people would listen and might even be persuaded.

Instead you're vomiting bile and flame, and people think you're a jerk, and don't even notice any issues you might bring up.

Just thinking out loud here, from someone recently rescued from negative points to someone else in that spot. 

stephenrjking

March 26th, 2016 at 10:16 PM ^

Pity, really; you claim to be a hockey fan. Michigan's hockey fans are, for the most part, a classy group, capable of interesting and insightful conversation about the sport. You would be an asset to the fanbase if you bothered to care. Instead, you have chosen to find significance in being a troll. You could find value in your own merits as a person, but that would require effort.

Doc Brown

March 26th, 2016 at 10:24 PM ^

I am not making anything up. I don't have to time to analyze every little thing about this team. I have more important things line my job and family. Keep making assumptions about me because I don't care about mgoblog enough. I admit I have been a jerk on here. Yes, I am Deker member and I should represent my self better on here. But here we are. I am sorry ok. However, I don't have the time or will to post diary worthy posts.

Doc Brown

March 26th, 2016 at 10:27 PM ^

I am not lying. So you can end that assumption. Yes, I should represent myself better on here. However, on my priority list of things I could actually care about mgoblog is below making the morning coffee. Aka I don't care about making diary worthy analysis posts. I don't the will to do that. However, the one thing I NEVER do on here is lie.